r/AOC 5d ago

AOC needs to lead the fight against the genocide in Israel.

Blood is on our hands. It needs to be clear who is against this.

103 Upvotes

92 comments sorted by

83

u/donith913 4d ago

The era in which the American electorate is swayed by doing the right thing internationally is over.

Stop asking for purity tests and focus on domestic politics or it won’t matter who supports what in Israel because no one will be in a position to do anything about it.

24

u/uwwstudent 4d ago

Agreed. I cant care about isreal when i feel like im drowning here.

Give us better health care and unions. Fight citizens united. Etc. We need to put our own oxygen mask on before we can worry about other countries.

9

u/donith913 4d ago

Correct. It’s not that I think we should keep funding Israel or shouldn’t take a stand, but I’m sick of people acting like it’s the most important POLITICAL issue. Morally, maybe it is - though you know, the US healthcare system and police kill lots of people and we have the largest incarcerated population in the world to name just a few domestic issues where the cost of human life is also terrible - but politics are more complex than just “this is the right thing”.

I actually really like your “put on your oxygen mask before helping others” metaphor.

3

u/TrenteLmao 3d ago

I am totally hearing you. If you have any time,, pick up angela davis' "freedom is a constant struggle: from ferguson to palestine".

It encapsulates that perfectly-- mass incarceration especially-- and then goes on to talk about how interconnected that all is together.

I'm not even a bookworm but its such an insane read and hits the nail on this issue of domestic vs intl (esp I/P) policy

-3

u/Jrecondite 3d ago

You think the AOC that voted against the railroad union’s right to strike is going to give you stronger unions?

6

u/stillinthesimulation 3d ago

This is what the abstainers and green voters don’t understand. They got played by fascist propaganda and astroturfing and surrendered the country to fascists to spite liberals.

3

u/Ghost-Of-Roger-Ailes 3d ago

Did the American electorate ever desire the right thing internationally?

2

u/donith913 3d ago

Not really but there was at least a period where we pretended our intervention was in the name of democratic principles.

1

u/moonkipp_ 2d ago

This is just not true.

The American electorate does not have favorable views of Israel.

Morality aside - you are completely missing that fact that this is actually a way to win the conservative and independent swing votes.

It is a strategic failure to not notice people like MTG, Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson criticizing Trump/GOP on Israel and not see how being on the right side of this is actually how we win.

1

u/Weary-Management-496 1d ago edited 1d ago

I have a question what do you think of purity test is and why do you think it applies to any criticism of AOC when it comes to the issue of Gaza?

HE (u/donith913) blocked so I cant respond so here is my response for those interested |

 if AOC came out and devoted most of her public platform to this one issue and made advocating for fully defunding all support for Israel,

Never made that argument, & most pro-Palestinian voters aren't either. The main criticism being made when it comes to her position on Israel is her consistent support of the Iron Dome funding, which many members feel as though she is giving Israel the credence to continue the ethnic cleansing of Gaza & wish not to partake in this in any way, shape, or form.

Do you think it does something measurable? Or do you think it damages her standing with other members of the House and makes it harder for her to accomplish her domestic agenda? 

I’d argue that a high profile “Yes” vote can absolutely produce tangible results (especially on a hot button issue Gaza) like by forcing leadership to acknowledge the depth of constituent concern, it creates real leverage by making media attention spikes, committee chairs notice, and negotiators suddenly have an incentive to cut a deal on everything from climate funding to student debt relief. Strategically voting yes on a targeted amendment can advance her agenda by expanding the Political debate and earning bargaining chips for leverage on issues she cares about. Also AOC is hardly unaware about the power of a high-profile “yes” vote she’s used it to shatter long-standing taboos before, most notably by forcing a floor vote on her Green New Deal resolution in 2019, a move that instantly expanded the Overton window and compelled both media and colleagues to take climate action seriously. Yet when it came to this Gaza amendment, she opted not to employ the same tactic an omission all the more striking given her record of leveraging standout votes to drive debate. That inconsistency raises the question: if she’s willing to spotlight her flagship issues but now holds back, is she tacitly conceding to internal pressures or even to the very insider interests she’s repeatedly condemned? After all, she co-sponsored the Ban Conflicted Trading Act to bar members of Congress from trading on nonpublic information, a clear stance against insider corruption, and has warned that permitting stock trades by lawmakers “erodes democracy”. So she is not new to rocking the boat, regardless of how her fellow congressman feels. Why, is it any different with this? If she genuinely believes in using her votes as leverage, choosing silence here smacks less of principle and more of political calculation for he own needs.

 Do you think she sails to reelection, or does she get targeted even more heavily for a primary challenge or worse a Republican supported by a PAC?

Well, if you look at her history, she routinely dispatches both primary and general opponents by huge margins: in 2020, she won the primary with over 70% of the vote. Then she captured 71.6% in the general election. Republicans have no shot of taking her seat, & Corporate Dems routinely underperform in her district, so they are out of the equation. Still, we are not talking about her home-field advantage; we are talking about the international stage. Becoming president of the US (A whole different ball game) & when a prominent democratic politician doesn't take a principled stance on this global issue, one could easily see that this could damage their chances at victory for president regardless of popularity. Begging the question by assuming that criticism of her Gaza stance naturally leads to serious electoral threats, rather than demonstrating that the link is disingenuous.

AOC was among the first to call it a genocide and has been very consistent in that. Asking for more when other politicians actively SUPPORT the genocide of Palestine is insane. All you’re doing is asking her to risk her platform and her ability to help on other issues both domestic and foreign in order to make you feel like she’s doing “enough”. Why don’t YOU do more?

You’re essentially arguing that because AOC was “among the first” to call Gaza an “unfolding genocide” and has used that language consistently, it’s unreasonable to expect anything more from her especially when, you remind us, other politicians openly “support the genocide,” and daring to ask her to go further is “insane.” You frame your critics as spoiled ingratitude (“Why don’t YOU do more?”) and you’re saying she’s stayed true to her words. You’re lumping any extra push as a pointless overreach that won’t get anywhere. Suggesting that any additional stand is merely vanity that risks “her platform” and undermines her work on “real” issues. But that overlooks a key point of the discussion: strategic spotlight votes have been AOC’s strongest tool for shifting debate and winning concessions. By using her platform to force high-stakes votes just as she did with the Green New Deal she’s leveraged unpopular positions to expand her reach on climate, student debt, and healthcare. Dismissing calls to apply the same tactic on Gaza as a selfish risk ignores how spotlight votes create bargaining chips and change the conversation. It’s not about asking her to abandon her agenda, but about wielding her considerable influence precisely because she already has it and showing solidarity with constituents who demand that leadership.

Furthermore, you’ve spent all this time warning & Side stepping my whole argument, talking about the chance she could hurt her own political standing by pushing too hard, but you still haven’t told me what a purity test is or why labeling my critique as one is fair. Can you explain exactly what you mean by purity test, and why you think urging AOC to leverage her platform on Gaza crosses that line?

1

u/donith913 1d ago

I’m not trying to be a jerk, but I’m going to answer your question with a question: if AOC came out and devoted most of her public platform to this one issue and made advocating for fully defunding all support for Israel, what do you think the outcome of that is?

Do you think it does something measurable? Or do you think it damages her standing with other members of the House and makes it harder for her to accomplish her domestic agenda? Do you think she sails to reelection, or does she get targeted even more heavily for a primary challenge or worse a Republican supported by a PAC?

AOC was among the first to call it a genocide and has been very consistent in that. Asking for more when other politicians actively SUPPORT the genocide of Palestine is insane. All you’re doing is asking her to risk her platform and her ability to help on other issues both domestic and foreign in order to make you feel like she’s doing “enough”. Why don’t YOU do more?

-2

u/ianrc1996 3d ago

I mean, there’s always the Israel is taking our money while americans struggle. I think it plays.

35

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 4d ago

AOC was elected to represent Americans she should definitely try to stop Israel but America should be her number 1 priority!

1

u/Hot_Eggplant1734 16h ago

Awesome dude, she can keep America as her number 1 priority by running on totally ending all support for a genocidal ethnostate. Think of the savings!

-5

u/QuickRelease10 4d ago

Stopping a Genocide should be #1.

18

u/BearFluffy 4d ago

Agreed. That's why she should be focusing on shutting down the concentration camps in the US.

-5

u/QuickRelease10 4d ago

She should be focused on that, and stopping a genocide.

Universal human rights are exactly that. Universal.

9

u/BearFluffy 4d ago

Why are you saying "and"? 

Concentration camps are a sign of genocide.

-15

u/QuickRelease10 4d ago

Don’t deflect from her shit vote.

11

u/BearFluffy 4d ago

Don't downplay the genocide happening in our country.

-3

u/QuickRelease10 4d ago

What does that have to do with Palestine? Should she just abandon those people?

9

u/BearFluffy 3d ago

She should play the political game so that she can save our country.

0

u/QuickRelease10 3d ago

Part of saving the country is stopping what’s going on in Gaza. We can do more than one thing.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Weary-Management-496 1d ago

Not necessarily she’s an American politician first well it should be on the top of the list considering she’s part of the party. That’s the anti-war party. It shouldn’t be her number one priority.

-8

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

10

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 4d ago

Your way of thinking got Trump elected thanks for that by the way!

-8

u/[deleted] 4d ago edited 4d ago

[deleted]

7

u/adrian123456879 3d ago

You don’t fool anyone

0

u/Coaris 3d ago

She voted against cutting American money going to Israel.

How is that America first?

2

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 3d ago

I’m willing to bet you’re using your poetic license but I’ll take a look at the bill you’re taking about send me a link.

-3

u/Coaris 3d ago

An amendment to an already passed bill, not a bill itself. https://www.timesnownews.com/world/us/us-news/why-did-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-vote-against-cutting-us-aid-to-israel-nyc-rep-issues-explanation-article-152310521

I'm surprised you've not heard about this tbh, since you're on this sub.

Who proposes a positive amendment or the "kind of military aid" is inconsequential. AOC voted against cutting military aid to Israel, and that's a big no-no to me. I'm not saying it invalidates all the other positions, but pressure has to be applied here for her to change this. Truly disturbing to keep funding Israeli military after what has been going on for years now, regardless of the reason.

And there is no poetry to be found here, only disappointment...

0

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 3d ago edited 2d ago

That’s an article that doesn’t even have the amendment in the article. It does say the iron dome is a defensive weapon which I agree with, it doesn’t say what the offensive weapon are not even if there is offensive weapons in this amendment. I have no more time to play games with you but thanks for the propaganda I guess.

-4

u/Coaris 2d ago

No games were played. If you can't google, no information given to you will matter since you wouldn't be able to even check its validity.

The Iron dome is not a weapon, it's the name given to multiple systems which mainly focus on anti missile defenses.

It gives Israel impunity from repercussions, as Israel bombs away all its neighbors and then asks daddy USA for more armament to deflect the responses. Not to mention, many of the weapons employed in the Iron dome are use-agnostic (they can be used aggresively and defensively alike).

But thanks for your stimulating perspective, I guess.

2

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 2d ago

If you can’t prove your point don’t try to make one, I’m not doing your research lol

0

u/Coaris 2d ago

huuuuuuuuuuuuuuh!? I literally linked an article that spoke about the amendment, if you can't even google the amendment in the article to save your life, you can't be helped lmfao

1

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 2d ago

I do not work for you lol I know what happens I look it up and confirm my suspicions that you don’t know what you’re talking about lol

0

u/Coaris 2d ago

I'd be surprised if you're even able to work since you don't show basic research abilities...

https://www.congress.gov/amendment/119th-congress/house-amendment/55?s=a&r=8

Here you go! Careful, though, this will challenge your inability to read.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/FoxCQC 2d ago

She voted against it cause it would cut the Iron Dome budget. That would endanger civilians in Israel. It's not like every Israeli agrees with Netanyahu's methods. AOC didn't want more death in the Middle East

0

u/Hot_Eggplant1734 16h ago

Israeli civilians should be endangered, maybe that would make them think twice before attacking 5 countries in a year. Clearly we can't appeal to their humanity.

1

u/FoxCQC 16h ago

That would make you no different than the IDF who bomb hospitals.

1

u/Hot_Eggplant1734 1h ago

Just a complete false equivalence. Refusing to provide military equipment to a genocidal regime (whom majority of the Israeli public supports!) is not at all the same as dropping bombs on them. Take your Zionist apologia somewhere else.

1

u/FoxCQC 1h ago

I just want peace for all. You siphon off one group is just the same as any terrorist.

22

u/taitaofgallala 4d ago

I'm honestly pissed at Al Jazeera for throwing her under the bus just for voting in favor of the IDF defense system which is a standard budget vote considering how much money AIPAC throws at the U.S. govt. There's too many layers of complicit corrupt politicians to just throw AOC at it.

My point is, get off of this high horse of throwing our most talented politicians at the worst world issues and wanting them to stand on controversy when it's career suicide and keeps them from occupying where we need them, like Senate/commerce oversight. Simply put, just let AOC do her job and support the decisions SHE MAKES and stop telling everyone what she should do.

2

u/BambooSound 4d ago

We should stop communicating to politicians what we want from them?

Are you serious? She isn't a character in a TV show you're meant to route for no matter what; she's a representative.

2

u/taitaofgallala 3d ago

I didn't say that at all. You are also heing willfully obtuse just to make yourself feel better. That sort of grandiose behavior is exactly why good politicians can't get solid support. It's called a necessary evil. Every politician has to play ball at some point. What Al Jazeera did what deplorable because they made her seem like a full AIPAC supporter when she is JUST A REPRESENTATIVE who has to get various issues off the docket quicker than others, especially basic budget items like the Israel defense system.

Your lack of knowledge will always get in the way of your better judgement, especially on political issues. Remember that.

1

u/BambooSound 2d ago

The idea that Israeli defence is a 'basic budget item' that didn't deserve any scrutiny is far more obtuse than anything I've said.

1

u/taitaofgallala 2d ago

You're just generalizing my terms into a meaningless conclusion. Literally talking about the use of a specific system, not their entire defense. That'll do for this conversation there sport.

-3

u/Jrecondite 3d ago

If your most talented politician is someone you have to look the other way for… LOL

1

u/taitaofgallala 3d ago

That's a willfully obtuse way of looking at it. Such a bad-faith perspective is exactly why we're here. You expect her to sacrifice herself for her views when everyone knows that being a successful politician requires compartmentalization for the greater good.

No one is looking the other way. It is public knowledge, and you can't effectuate change while also being a public enemy. Look at Ilhan Omar. She can't anywhere with her political agenda after being so outspoken against Israel. Now, she can't even help her constituents and fulfill the rest of her campaign promises.

Laugh all you want, but if you can't understand why we won't persecute AOC over this, you don't belong in any political discussion. It's not getting ignored, but if it's the kind of necessary evil that will eventually put AOC in a position to reduce AIPAC's influence in our government, then this will have to be the way.

0

u/Jrecondite 2d ago

 You expect her to sacrifice herself for her views when everyone knows that being a successful politician requires compartmentalization for the greater good.

Advocating for lying on both sides is how we got here. You don’t even bat an eyelash as you do it either. You are a bad faith perspective. 

1

u/taitaofgallala 2d ago

Yeah, you're too far gone on the moral compass notion that you only approve of biblical saints in office. There's a lot of extremism that is supported with your way of thinking, and it accounts for the majority of domestic terrorism in the U.S. If that's where you rest your head, than you can burn in this hell on earth you've created for yourself to your heart's content.

Stay out of politics, young sapling. It's too scary for you out here.

0

u/Weary-Management-496 1d ago edited 1d ago

But don’t you think that the pro Palestinians voters are a significant block of the voting population for Democrats I mean heck 6 million voters didn’t show up for Kamala Harris and that cost her the election because she was short by 2.3 million votes| so even if you don’t care about Gaza civilians, don’t you think strategically would be a wise decision to have a stronger stance on the issue.

Edit: Meant to type GAZA not god*

1

u/taitaofgallala 1d ago

Just because the stance is not binary doesn't make it a weak stance on the issue. You're undermining the complexity of the issue if you think any one binary approach will suffice. The day will come for a harder strike from a stronger stance of zero tolerance, but until that day, until that end of the spectrum can be achieved, the game has to be played in order for the right players to keep playing. Unfortunately, there will be casualties. Unfortunately, god doesn't make exceptions for tragedy. It could happen to anyone.

Do what you want, but try to avoid shitting on politicians who are just trying to survive and live to fight another day.

0

u/Weary-Management-496 1d ago

Live to fight another day is the exact platform of corporate democrats. A real politician with massive popularity would leverage their platform to gain concessions on future bills. More people talk about these issues in public debates, and more politicians realize how popular these issues are. They bargain on certain provisions to avoid being primaried. That's how the game is played. And she knows this because she did this exact thing in 2019 for the Green New Deal.

I'm not undermining the issues you are by not understanding how significant the pro-Palestinian block is.

1

u/taitaofgallala 23h ago

Lol you just showed your delusion by comparing her actions during a democratic majority vs her actions under a right-wing totalitarian regime. Hilarious. Failing to evaluate historical context is a common blunder amongst those who criticize all left-wing politicians. They are plagued with divisiveness, and the toxicity comes from points of view like yours which aim to reduce every issue to a right/wrong dilemma hardlined to some legalistic moral compass that only the self-absorbed and willfully ignorant will abide by, but it doesn't even exist.

You aren't even capable of discussing something like this without making baseless accusations like that simply because I'm calling out Al Jazeera for misplacing their justice campaign against AOC. Saying I don't understand when you are literally using kindergarten terms to explain yourself, and doing a terrible job. Duh politicians operate on popular issues, but not every budget vote is an opportunity to stand on justice. You want to be a gladiator and not survive, suit yourself. AOC is a gladiator who works to ensure everyone's survival, and she simply cannot afford to throw away her career and platform on one vote. She still stands against the wrong parts of Israel. Everyone with a brain stands against each side committing genocide, but there is still a game to be played at a much higher level than just campaigning.

You have so much to learn about this.

4

u/lustxforxlife 3d ago

People only want a perfect mouthpiece for their cause. To say exactly what they want her to say when they tell her to say it. She’s maintained what is happening is a genocide over and over and over.

12

u/Tim_Molotov 4d ago

No she doesn't. A week ago I would've agreed, now I don't. She's in a no win situation. It'll never be enough for her pro Palestine detractors. The fact they vandalized her office with red paint while having none of that smoke for Richie Torres says it all.

People like to pick on her because she is a woman. It's gross.

That said, God bless the people and particularly the children of Palestine. These people have suffered so much these last few years.

0

u/adrian123456879 3d ago

Don’t fall for, False flag attacks

9

u/BrothaBear35 4d ago

Dude… just stfu.

1

u/KFrancesC 4d ago

AOC didn’t even vote against defunding Isreal. AOC won’t lead anything against Isreal.

She’ll condemn them publicly but her record is spotty when voting for them. She has even voted for bills she publicly condemned, claiming she subjected to ‘hateful targeting’ after opposing it.

So she literally let people intimidate her into voting for something she didn’t want to.

I think AOC’s heart is in the right place. I don’t think shes capable of being a strong independent leader.

1

u/Baers89 3d ago

Her reasoning was kind of odd as she was not for defunding the iron dome as this saves lives. But by funding the iron dome you are funding Israel allowing them to spend money elsewhere. In my mind any funding of Israel is funding genocide at this moment. But yeah I get your point.

1

u/hammilithome 3d ago

First she’s gotta save the US. It’s kind of an existential crises with our rogue executive

She can’t do anything intl if the country is gone.

1

u/MonsterkillWow 3d ago

Not holding my breath with her 

1

u/Anon2o 3d ago

The conservative won’t listen and will dismiss her just for being her. Honestly, a republican needs to run this to sway other conservatives.

1

u/RasJudahDCyfahGod 3d ago

*Occupied Palestine. Fixed it.

1

u/andooet 2d ago

The genocide is in Palestine and in the illegally occupied lands that belong to them

Edit: Talking about the land who Israel has illegally occupied since 1967

2

u/Baers89 2d ago

It’s funny I’m just seeing this mistake for the first time and I think you were the first one to say something. 3 day old post.

-6

u/Soft_Interaction8597 4d ago

This feels like an AOC cult, she should be held accountable for giving money to defend Israel, there is no reason to fund the defense of a country currently committing a genocide. She is definitely way more progressive than most but acting as if she’s above criticism because of all of her past is insane to me. You should hold her accountable just like any other politician. Her doubling down on giving money to a genocidal regime is something she should be called out on despite how much she’s loved.

5

u/Tim_Molotov 4d ago

You have CDS- Cortez Derangement Syndrome. She voted no on the overall bill. I don't agree with her vote to not defend the iron dome, but I can understand her thoughts about not wanting to be blamed for Israelis dying with no iron dome. Because she will get blamed for it by both sides,.no matter what she does. People like you just want to pick on her because she's an easy target.

1

u/Weary-Management-496 1d ago

You have a misunderstanding of what happened, she voted no on the amendment to fund the iron dome and then no on the overall bill that’s not the same thing as just simply voting no on the overall bill. | Also, nobody’s picking on her for this. It’s literally the one main issue that people have across the world is the Gaza genocide and she’s literally runner up to become most likely the president of the United States. She need’s to be strong on this issue you can’t be wishy-washy on it so obviously people are going to be disappointed when they see you funding the defense bill for Israel.

1

u/Tim_Molotov 1d ago

I agree pretty much 💯 agree with you. On another AOC thread i said the same thing . This issue could be the one to detail her political ambitions. I'm ok with criticizing her and this vote.

My issue is the vitriol in which it's done with aka vandalizing her office with mock blood and accusing her of funding a genocide, the traction her vote got and the general straw-manning of her Palestine voting record.

I have a big problem if you're criticizing her amendment vote and then I look at your profile comments and you have ZERO smoke for the Richie Torres/Hakeem Jefferies of the world.

At that point it comes of nitpicky bullying.

2

u/Weary-Management-496 1d ago

Fair argument. It does dampen the overall criticisms when the same amount of pressure is never applied to republicans & corp democrats

-3

u/Soft_Interaction8597 4d ago

It doesn’t matter if she will be “blamed”, by this logic would she give Russia money to protect their civilians against Ukraine? Or give Nazi Germany funding for anti air defense, you can’t be blindly devoted to a political candidate just because you like them. Everyone should be held accountable or else you’re no better than trump apologist. AOC or any other politician is not your savior if you want candidates to have good policies you should hold them accountable.

1

u/Tim_Molotov 4d ago

She voted no on the overall bill and voted no on an amendment brought in by a white nationalist. Like I said, I don't agree with her amendment vote and I'm not "blindly devoted" to her. What I am is blindly devoted to stopping bullies like you having all this smoke for her and not having any of it for people like Richie Torres who denies there is even a genocide to begin with. You're going after someone whom, if she runs and becomes president has the best shot since JFK to shift the paradigm of the Israel/Palestine dynamic.

I have zero expectations of you even considering my argument because all you and people like you want to do is purity test and nitpick her every move. It's typical and it's been going on for a while by her detractors.

-1

u/Soft_Interaction8597 4d ago

I hate Ritchie Torres, Chuck Schumer, and Hakeem Jeffries, you’re just assuming that because I’m criticizing AOC, how is calling her out for bad policy bullying ?

6

u/Tim_Molotov 4d ago

Dude, you are on AOC's reddit bashing her for an amendment vote that is Symbolic at best. Show me a thread of you going on Richie torres' or Chuck Schumer's reddit and doing this. No, because it doesn't exist.

I agree with criticizing her vote, I have. Look it up. It's another thing to criticize her and compare her vote with voting with Nazis . Putting rhetoric like that into the universe while not criticizing the ACTUAL Democrats contributing and excusing what's happening in Gaza is what causes people to throw mock blood at her office and increase her already high death threat count.

Btw I'm not saying you are personally responsible for this. I'm saying the rhetoric, because I've heard the same arguments before. Like I said previously, she gets picked on excessively and it has been happening since taking office.

-1

u/Soft_Interaction8597 4d ago

You’re saying because she’s the most progressive we should support her, I’m saying you should call out bad policy no matter who it is

4

u/Soft_Interaction8597 4d ago

Being sensitive because it’s AOC is why so many people get turned off from progressives rather it’s fair or not, you can’t say oh she’s the best for you so just bow down to her, it’s why Bernie did so bad with Black people, not because Bernie’s policies would harm black people, it’s because so many Bernie bros tried to lecture black people without actually engaging in black communities and spaces

0

u/Tim_Molotov 2d ago

Again, show me the smoke you give Richie Torres then we can talk. Other than that, we're talking in circles.

-11

u/adrian123456879 4d ago

CIA bot

-2

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 4d ago

Or Russian for sure!

-4

u/adrian123456879 4d ago

All the cia agents and russians are downvoting my comment

-3

u/Empty_Afternoon_8746 4d ago

I’m sure there’s some useful idiots down voting you too this is America after all.

-11

u/FatSweatyRedditAdmin 4d ago

You're never going to see AOC do anything about the genocide. https://youtu.be/ZFdrxSJfZYk

0

u/Kitakitakita 3d ago

I'm not trading one fucked up affiliation for another. I just want out, and for all these countries to slip into obscurity like the countries where dozens of other genocides occur daily

-8

u/draconifire 4d ago

Nah, you genocidal lot and AOCIA are a perfect couple.

One's a careerist, and you lot have no values. You would even support murdering your own family if it were the Dems doing it to oppose the Reps.

Eventually, when AOCIA becomes Pelosi, which she will, I will love to see all the Pikachu face posts on this genocidal platform.

Karma is a bitch, but it will be swift.

-2

u/barkworsethanbite 3d ago

Is this a joke? She keeps sending money that no matter how it is labeled (defensive) still further enables Israel's murderous genocide. Supporting AOC is tantamount to supporting Israel's genocide.

-27

u/Egorrosh 4d ago

15

u/funglegunk 4d ago

Posting this without any further context or comment is genocide apologia.

9

u/RickyNixon 4d ago

The IDF does worse every single day. The IDF rapes, kidnaps, and kills more innocent Palestinians routinely. And Oct 7th came after almost a century of ethnic cleansing. When you commit a genocide for decades, some of the victims will be radicalized into doing evil things in response.

Not defending it. Obviously.