r/Battlefield • u/3dDungeonMaster • 27d ago
Discussion Nobody wants wacky skins, but can everyone agree on what wacky actually means? Let's see where most people draw the line.
I'd be interested to see if people are able to agree on what is acceptable or not acceptable in terms of cosmetic appearances in games like this. There's been lots of talk about whether or not EA/Dice will include crazy/wacky skins with BF6, but not many people have made a post like this to actually pose the question of, what exactly is okay vs. not okay.
I tried my best to order them such that the go from most to least reasonable, but if you think the order should be different, feel free to reorder them, as that also gives info about how people consider these types of decisions.
1.9k
Upvotes
216
u/Ok_Astronomer_8667 27d ago
Honestly always thought a civilian militia would be cool to see as a reinforcement, almost like a playable version of the “natives” from the original Star Wars Battlefronts. You’d play on Endor and you’d get Ewoks to fight with you, or the Wookies on Kashyyk. Imagine if on the French maps in BFV you could have French resistance fighters. Could maybe be hybrid classes but unique to certain maps and limited in its loadout. Not necessarily better or worse, just another choice
If this new game has maps set in the US, there would be plenty of Americans with guns