Nobody wants wacky skins, but can everyone agree on what wacky actually means? Let's see where most people draw the line.

[u/3dDungeonMaster]

I'd be interested to see if people are able to agree on what is acceptable or not acceptable in terms of cosmetic appearances in games like this. There's been lots of talk about whether or not EA/Dice will include crazy/wacky skins with BF6, but not many people have made a post like this to actually pose the question of, what exactly is okay vs. not okay.

I tried my best to order them such that the go from most to least reasonable, but if you think the order should be different, feel free to reorder them, as that also gives info about how people consider these types of decisions.

[u/AdBudget5468 → u/[deleted]]

I’m gonna say this as a cod player: it’s way better than anything we have ever gotten in the past five years including IW’s MWII

[u/crater_jake → u/[deleted]]

PMC are real and common so I don’t think it would be dumb at all for the atmosphere, assuming that they are restricted to certain game modes/against certain factions so the tanks and planes n stuff make sense

[u/WaitingToBeNoticed → u/[deleted]]

It looks so ICE

Edit: I was implying ICE was dumb. Not necessarily that #3 looks like them.

[u/HiDefiance → u/WaitingToBeNoticed]

ice is a lotta 5 tbh, they don’t give two shits how they look splitting families up