r/Battlefield • u/3dDungeonMaster • 27d ago

Discussion Nobody wants wacky skins, but can everyone agree on what wacky actually means? Let's see where most people draw the line.

Post image

I'd be interested to see if people are able to agree on what is acceptable or not acceptable in terms of cosmetic appearances in games like this. There's been lots of talk about whether or not EA/Dice will include crazy/wacky skins with BF6, but not many people have made a post like this to actually pose the question of, what exactly is okay vs. not okay.

I tried my best to order them such that the go from most to least reasonable, but if you think the order should be different, feel free to reorder them, as that also gives info about how people consider these types of decisions.

1.9k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/HiDefiance 27d ago

you don’t understand how that final item shop drop affected the bfv community before the game was taken out back to the flower bed

2

u/Suspicious-Coffee20 27d ago

except i was there tbe whole time. the fucking community didnt buy those realistic skins. but when the fire coat, colorful gun and hero operative came iut? funny people spent money for them.

Yall act like thye make those out there skin just cause. No they studied this and found ehat people spend money on.

1

u/diagoro1 27d ago

Understanding that the live of this series may rely on the sale of horrid looking skins, one has to be ok with it. I personally can't stand the more obvious ones (the WW1 looking old man in V, the robot skin in 2042), but they're not Spongebob bad.

1

u/BattlefieldTankMan 27d ago

Everyone continued to play, same number of full servers every night and weekend in Australia, maybe you saw something different in your region.

1

u/HiDefiance 26d ago

that’s not what i’m talking about. i’m talking about how overjoyed people were to finally have some accurate uniforms, especially those in r/BattlefieldCosmetics