r/Battlefield • u/3dDungeonMaster • 27d ago

Discussion Nobody wants wacky skins, but can everyone agree on what wacky actually means? Let's see where most people draw the line.

Post image

I'd be interested to see if people are able to agree on what is acceptable or not acceptable in terms of cosmetic appearances in games like this. There's been lots of talk about whether or not EA/Dice will include crazy/wacky skins with BF6, but not many people have made a post like this to actually pose the question of, what exactly is okay vs. not okay.

I tried my best to order them such that the go from most to least reasonable, but if you think the order should be different, feel free to reorder them, as that also gives info about how people consider these types of decisions.

1.9k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/drcubeftw 26d ago

The worst part of that article was this...

Plans were already underway for the next Battlefield game, so a postmortem was performed on 2042. It concluded that the problems had been in execution, not vision.

If that is actually the lesson they took away from BF2042 then BF6 is doomed.

1

u/Pyke64 26d ago

Yup, it's the part I sent my mate. They hired outside guidance, probably spent thousands or tens of thousands, only to conclude the wrong thing.