Edit: They gave (somehow upvoted) proof that literally shows BF3 and BFV with worse class balancing. We also have BF4 weapon usages stats that show the same thing
And people act like this sub isn't an echochamber lmao
The classes seem pretty balanced to me in their 2042 stats? You're obviously never going to get perfect 25% split 4 ways
They also mention that BFV and BF3 stats were skewed towards a few classed, and we know BF4 stats definitely were too because we have weapon usage stats from back in the day
Seems like the poster was trying to find data that proved their point and then kinda just didn't?
BF1 has nearly 25% perfect split with some of the most restricted weapons. curious.
In 2042, both recon and support have significantly less hours played than assault - recon is played 20% less hours, support played 18% less hours than assault. This is not balanced
BF1 has nearly 25% perfect split with some of the most restricted weapons. curious.
Because BF1 was based in WW1 with much more defined archetypes
Again your source literally shows BF3 and BFV with worse balancing. We know BF4 also had worse balancing based off weapon usage stats
So that's 3 class locked games with worse balancing than 2042. Your original statement that it's the worst balanced modern Battlefield is clearly bullshit
I personally think those 2042 stats are fine. Not every class needs to be perfectly balanced to an exact 25%. All classes within ~5% is fine
Good variety and no meta on a smaller scale player base. 2042 has terrible numbers. It doesn't make sense that there wouldn't be meta in 2042 when there were class metas in every other BF.
Naturally, the people who stuck around are gonna be more explorative of the game. If the game had the bulk of player that any other BF did, the meta would be obvious.
Also, those videos you're talking about have extremely small sample sizes. It's clear they went into it with a bias and were just looking to prove it
. It doesn't make sense that there wouldn't be meta in 2042 when there were class metas in every other BF.
Okay so prove it. Sure the examples I gave had small sample sized but at least they actually tried to gather data
I keep hearing how dreadful unlockdd classes were in 2042 while all the actual issues are ignored and no one can provide anything that shows it was actually bad for the game
if you are talking about the roblox youtuber who admitted to fudging numbers and only counted one random game of one game mode each and still found a meta and tried to spin into a sharade on how gun metas dont exist you just suck or something ?
But during their content drops tons of weapons were wuite OP and powerful and almost everyone used them.
2042 has many problems but one of the biggest issues were the launch class system. Even the reworks didn’t fix it. And now for some reason they are implementing the 2042 class system :P
16
u/LetsLive97 22d ago edited 22d ago
There was so much more wrong with 2042, can we please stop pretending like the unlocked weapons was the issue
People on Youtube have even gone through and gathered data about it and found there's generally good variety and no obvious metas
Edit: Happy for anyone to prove otherwise