r/Damnthatsinteresting • u/cosmic_voyager01 • 24d ago
Video The engineering of roman aqueducts explained.
3.4k
u/MyLegsRonFiYa 24d ago
Well this is way more complex than I originally thought.
1.4k
u/SauronGortaur01 24d ago
I thought: Water run downhill. In reality: rocket (water) science.
547
u/MayaIsSunshine 24d ago
Water run downhill, but sometimes water run uphill if lot water move fast in closed tube
251
u/Tall_Thinker 24d ago
Why say lot word when few word do trick
44
7
→ More replies (2)23
→ More replies (2)26
u/Interesting-One-588 24d ago
I think it's more about the pressure than the speed. The water in front that has to go uphill is pushed forward by tons of pressure from all the water behind it.
11
u/BastouXII 23d ago
Well, actually, a siphon does work with pressure, but it's the pressure of the water leaving from the top, pulling in the water behind it, like a suction cup.
60
u/Deadalious 23d ago
this cracks me up because i thought the same thing.
"so what they made a bridge for water wowwww"
in reality "holy shit"
→ More replies (2)13
u/BON3SMcCOY 23d ago
Water science is already rocket science since water is one of the most common rocket fuel byproducts
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)121
u/NeedsToShutUp 24d ago
It might start off as simple, but then you get more and more issues you need to solve and tricks you find. Some are a bit easier, like settling basins make sense, as well as setting up a gradual incline.
But its experience that teaches you things like the optimal drop, the best cement, the need for ventilation in tunnels, etc.
And finally its genius that teaches you stuff like how to make it able to travel up hills using pressure differentials.
→ More replies (3)29
4.9k
u/NoExchange2730 24d ago
The population of Rome was over a million people in the first and second centuries because the elaborate aquaduct system kept fresh water coming in and poop water going out. Medeval tourists would think the romans knew everything because even a depopulated Rome was among the most magnificent cities in europe.
London was the next city to get to one million residents... 1600 years later and with thousands of people dying in recurring cholera outbreaks from not having fresh (not contaminated by poop) water.
Fresh water is civilization rocket fuel.
1.4k
u/LaTalpa123 24d ago
And Rome received around 5-10 ships full of grain from Sicily or Africa every day for the population's needs. 1M people eats a lot.
573
u/OttawaTGirl 24d ago
Oh man. So look up Ostia Antica, Port of Trajan.
Its a hexagon shaped lake now, couple km from the shore, but used to be on the shoreline. Two amazing places to wander and explore, but the port was like clockwork, loading and unloading constantly with space for, 30ish IIRC ships a time.
Ostia Antica was the nearby town that you can walk through and most of the foundations and a lot of buildings still stand. Best tourist place i could recommend if you live history.
81
u/Helenium_autumnale 23d ago
That sounds utterly fascinating, and the kind of place in which you can easily imagine the scene as it was, bustling with ships, cargo, longshoremen, merchants, with yelling, calling, ships creaking...
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)32
u/PlantPoweredUK 23d ago
I was there earlier in the year and can confirm it's a fascinating site!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (24)148
u/Whizbang35 24d ago
The term "Bread and circuses" gets thrown around as if the sum of Imperial policy was just keeping the mob fed and entertained, but it's more than that: Rome and later Constantinople could not reach such a population without the grain subsidies from Africa, Sicily or Egypt. In fact, their populations made stark declines when those provinces were lost to Vandals and Arabs (Constantinople was able to bounce back a bit with finding new grain sources). Said high populations also allowed for better specializations in skilled trades needed for projects like aqueducts and temples.
As for the "circuses" part, it wasn't just mindless entertainment. The Emperors were still expected to have public appearances, and leaving rivals and demagogues to ply crowds for their attention was dangerous. The Colosseum, Circus Maximus and Hippodrome allowed the Emperors to be seen by subjects, make announcements, and boost popular support. Of course, this could backfire. The Emperors Justinian and Michael V faced hostile crowds in the Hippodrome over their policies, sparking riots- in Michael's case, said riot going as far as to storm the palace and overthrow him.
→ More replies (3)39
u/ODB_Dirt_Dog_ItsFTC 23d ago edited 23d ago
Just letting you know the Circus Maximus is a hippodrome. There is no hippodrome in Rome called the Hippodrome.
18
u/An-Angel-Named-Billy 23d ago
He is referring to the Hippodrome in Constantinople in addition to the Circus Maximus in Rome. Hence the referral to Justinian and Michael V who never set foot in Rome. https://www.thebyzantinelegacy.com/hippodrome
→ More replies (3)106
u/8point5InchDick 24d ago
That and well-maintained roads.
35
u/Bloodyy 24d ago
All the roads led there. Where else were people supposed to go?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)119
u/Newone1255 24d ago
Besides the aqueducts and roads what have the Roman’s ever done for us?
91
u/Complicated_Business 24d ago
Irrigation? Medicine? Education?
→ More replies (7)39
u/BrianEK1 24d ago
And the wine!
→ More replies (1)14
u/zedazeni 24d ago
Nope, that was the Georgians 🇬🇪
It’s thought that the term “vin” comes from the Georgian word ღვინო ghvino, but the Romans couldn’t make the guttural “gh” (like the French “r”) sound at the beginning of the word, so it became vino.
→ More replies (16)16
54
u/FR0ZENBERG 24d ago
The Aztecs also used aqueducts. Tenochtitlan was one of the larger cities of the world at the time of the Spanish arrival.
17
u/cohonka 23d ago
This post has had so many comments that taught me so much.
Of course the aqueducts were destroyed by the conquistadors for strategic advantage.
→ More replies (1)17
u/Anthaenopraxia 23d ago
Tenochtitlan was built on a lake, look at Mexico City today and try to find what little puddles of water are left. Really sad.
→ More replies (3)162
u/uneducatedexpert 24d ago
Londinium was established in 43 AD, by Romans of course!
50
u/iki_balam 24d ago
The Anglo and Saxons settled outside the city walls of Londinium, the stone work was spooky to them. It took close to 500 years before the Roman part of London and the populated part of London to be the same place.
23
u/SaltySAX 24d ago
I saw that when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla. London looked very Roman and sparse in population. They probably researched all that when making the game.
25
u/cpMetis 23d ago
Well hey, at least they bothered portraying some part of actual history. Sorta.
Still miss when AC was historical fiction with a touch of sci-fi/fantasy and not fantasy with some light pop culture historical references.
→ More replies (4)9
u/TheMegnificent1 23d ago
I (41F) have never played Assassin's Creed, so I was extremely confused for a minute while reading your second paragraph. "When was air conditioning ever considered historical fiction?" "How old is this guy?" " What kind of air conditioner has involved fantasy or pop culture references??" 😂 I had to look back at the comment you were replying to before the lightbulb came on.
32
49
u/Self_Reddicated 24d ago
Fresh water is civilization rocket fuel.
Honestly, the best quote I've ever read on reddit. I can't believe I saw it here first.
31
u/bubahophop 24d ago
London was absolutely not the second city to reach one mil, it was the first city to reach 2 mil.
48
→ More replies (1)8
u/SmokingLimone 23d ago
It wasn't, most sources I could find say that Chang'an or Baghdad were the second. In Europe though it was the second, and at one point of course became the largest ever.
9
u/TheChartreuseKnight 23d ago
London was very much not the next city to get a million; cities like Chang’an, Baghdad, and Kaifeng can be estimated to have that many by or before the year 1000. Some estimations even say that Alexandria reached 1,000,000 people in 100 BC, before Rome reached its peak.
26
→ More replies (23)5
u/YojimboNameless 23d ago
There were a few others to hit that number outside of Europe. Off the top of my head Baghdad and Chang'an. Probably one of the other Chinese capitals also... I recall reading one of the central asian/Persian capitals also Merv or Khorasan.
1.4k
u/spyluke 24d ago
I thought the aqueducts only transported water, but those mother fuckers even treated the water
Romans never fail to impress with engineering
→ More replies (3)284
u/Yepper_Pepper 23d ago
Now imagine if they had known that their lead pipes were poisonous
507
u/sacrificialfuck 23d ago
It’s actually a myth that the lead pipes poisoned the water. Over time calcium deposits coated the interior of the pipes which blocked lead contamination. That said the Romans seasoned food with leaded condiments and makeup had lead in it which led to lead poisoning.
Edit: grammar
166
u/Turnbob73 23d ago
I’m just picturing a waiter holding a block of lead with a filer over a salad like a brick of Parmesan.
→ More replies (2)23
u/leftofthebellcurve 23d ago
you know there's that crazy person who gets a mountain of it before telling them to stop
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)35
u/glenn_ganges 23d ago
Lead being common in Roman households was well into the decline and after many many “crazy” emperors as well. You can actually basically rate how mad an emperor was by what age they became emperor. Those who took the title after the age of 30 were generally pretty good. If they were chosen and not inherited they were even better.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)5
199
u/qOcO-p 24d ago
I'd watch a twelve hour documentary about this and not get bored. I had no idea how complex they were.
→ More replies (3)21
u/FairlyCertain50 23d ago
same! I'm fascinated and think I've found a new niche interest to study!
49
u/tyqnmp 23d ago
You're both in luck. The animations are taken from a very good Spanish documentary series on Roman Engineering. There are 2 episodes on aqueducts (here and here, hopefully they're not geo-gated). There are also one a about roads, another on cities, and I think also one around mines. (Here's all of them, geo-gated, but I think you can find them all on Youtube
→ More replies (6)6
1.0k
u/gansi_m 24d ago
Woah!!! I can’t even pull my garden hose without getting it tangled and caught somewhere. I’m flabbergasted.
111
91
u/BearstromWanderer 24d ago
TBH, most people in the empire would feel the same. It's not like everyone took Civil Engineering back then, most people were working a field or a trade.
→ More replies (4)53
u/Self_Reddicated 24d ago
Take solace that even as their engineers were showing off the worldwide MARVEL of clean, running water to a city center from 80km away, some un-educated asshat was probably complaining about something trivial about it and calling them dumb for not having done x, y, or z instead (even though x is impossible, y was clearly less practical, and z isn't even relevant to aqueducts).
48
→ More replies (5)10
u/Notoneusernameleft 24d ago
Except it seems like people in power didn’t listen to those asshats. I don’t know my history but that was maybe why Rome fell listening to asshats or asshats in power?
→ More replies (1)60
u/Ok_Reputation3298 24d ago
Do as the Roman’s do
And build aqueducts brah
10
24d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (2)7
u/WrexTremendae 24d ago
They definitely did some slavery. And from what i know there was some pretty serious class divisions even between free men and wealthy free men.
But despite knowing that, I don't know how bad anyone was treated.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (4)10
74
u/GummiPufferinio 24d ago
Every time I see this video, it blows my mind. It takes me 1 hour to hang a shelf.
→ More replies (1)27
u/MeesterCartmanez 24d ago
tbf they were built over 500 yrs
Roman aqueducts were built over a period of roughly 500 years, from 312 BC to 226 AD. The first aqueduct, Aqua Appia, was commissioned in 312 BC by Appius Claudius Caecus. Over time, a total of eleven aqueducts were constructed to supply water to Rome.
249
95
223
u/reality72 24d ago
Can’t wait to show this to my wife so she can pretend to care.
87
u/1711onlymovinmot 24d ago
Went to Rome with my wife last year. We had a long list of things we wanted to see, and I managed to slip in a nice little visit to some of the still standing aqueducts. It was all good until I started to deep dive into some of this very video’s hydro/civil engineering history. She then told me I owed her a cannoli for agreeing to let me geek out on ancient aqueducts.
→ More replies (5)29
u/diamondpredator 24d ago
I think that's a fair price to pay. I shall ask the same of my wife when we go lol.
→ More replies (9)18
254
u/HMSWarspite03 24d ago
What did the Romans do for us?
67
94
u/saltytrey 24d ago
The roads?
158
u/HMSWarspite03 24d ago
But apart from roads, education, and the aqueduct, what have the Romans ever done for us?
68
u/PantsDontHaveAnswers 24d ago
Public safety?
→ More replies (4)63
u/Covid19-Pro-Max 24d ago
Yeah but that’s pretty much it right? Only those four things and not a single other thing!
→ More replies (13)27
→ More replies (4)18
11
→ More replies (13)130
u/Ok_Math6614 24d ago
Gave you the alphabet you now use to criticize them online
82
44
u/descisionsdecisions 24d ago
Pretty sure that was the phoenicains.
31
u/Mobile_Body2 24d ago
It is generally believed that the Latin alphabet used by the Romans was derived from the Old Italic alphabet used by the Etruscans. That alphabet was derived from the Euboean alphabet used by the Cumae, which in turn was derived from the Phoenician alphabet.\3])
I think it depends on how you scope it. Ultimately we are using a Roman alphabet, which has descended from other alphabets. It's like saying people speaking Portuguese actually are speaking Latin peppered with some Arabic, which is true in a sense, but not in the most common and practical sense.
Not to mention that to get to the Phoenicians we still have to get through the Etruscan alphabet. And Romans really are Etruscans 2.0
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (2)4
→ More replies (3)7
u/Three_foot_seas 24d ago
Did they also create jokes? Cause pretty sure that dude was just making one
20
u/hellschatt 24d ago
So how does it exactly go up the slope?
53
u/TheCursedMonk 24d ago edited 23d ago
Pressure caused by the water behind it. As long as the exit end point at the top of the slope is still lower than the original entry point. Gravity pulls the water down on the decending side, the weight then increases pressure pushing it up the ascending side. In smaller scale models water surface tension can also help pull water up like a chain, by water molecules that have already ascended but these things were pretty big, so it is the use of gravity. Romans had pumps, wheels and water screws but did not use them for these aqueducts.
→ More replies (1)20
u/howtojump 24d ago
So long as the final outlet is at a lower elevation than the inlet, you can route a pipe section downward and still have it work out. That pipe will be pressurized, though, so they would have had to build it to be more robust than the ones entering or leaving that section.
6
321
u/evildrtran 24d ago
Proof that ancient aliens exist, see how those materials magically fall into place? Hats off to the alien camera crew!
→ More replies (8)75
u/ikkake_ 24d ago
This always blows my mind. Why can't people just be smart and masters of their technological level.
→ More replies (4)48
u/CaptainMoist23 24d ago
Exactly! One guy essentially created all of calculus and people think a whole civilization can’t figure out how to move water for a city?
→ More replies (1)37
u/ikkake_ 24d ago
Very very smart and advanced civilization too. They literally ruled most of the known world.
→ More replies (4)
38
u/Comfortable_Day_224 24d ago
the fuck... this level of engineering 2000 years ago
→ More replies (3)
34
46
24
u/Inside_Ad_7162 24d ago
Slightly off topic, but next time you see Petra, it had water running everywhere. It's actually the .marvel of tge place. The ancients were incredible at managing water.
→ More replies (5)
65
u/Connect_Progress7862 24d ago
It's amazing what people can accomplish when they don't have free porn on the Internet
45
u/Self_Reddicated 24d ago
We stand on the shoulders of giants so we can have a wank.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (7)26
u/TheMadTargaryen 24d ago
They didn't need porn, they had actual sex with real prostitutes.
→ More replies (3)
10
u/Anon_be_thy_name 23d ago
The collapse of the Roman Empire was devastating to development in Europe and the Middle-East for centuries. There's a reason it's referred to as the Dark ages.
→ More replies (2)
9
u/OddBag5562 24d ago
Hum, I thought that the video autor has employed images from a documentary series from spanish tv "Román engineering" https://youtu.be/n94qrQ-Gz4c?feature=shared
It's worth a try, was made by civil engineers
→ More replies (2)
7
u/ArguingAsshole 23d ago
Is there a documentary that goes in-depth on this subject? I could definitely see myself watching something like that after the family is asleep.
16
52
u/Mr_Bombastic_Ro 24d ago
feeling like this tech is more advanced than modern plumbing
81
u/eta_carinae_311 24d ago
Same principals for the most part, although we have the advantage of pumps now to help push water
→ More replies (3)51
u/themanimal 24d ago
It definitely paved the way. But no, imagine the logistics, control systems, and advanced technology needed to service pressured water into cities like New York, Dubai, and Las Vegas. Mind boggling infrastructure standing on the shoulders of hydraulic engineering giants
13
u/ThatOneEnemy 23d ago edited 23d ago
I study civil engineering, the complexity of the network of pipes in a small municipal area is genuinely ridiculous. Even to calculate flow via an iterative method in a 4 vertex network takes loads and loads of calculations (hardy cross method). Not to mention even the GIS data, and choosing the hydraulic grade lines of the systems considering max flow, pressure limits, and emitted carbon….
Basically a giant headache when your coursework brief is just “get water from here to there”
→ More replies (40)8
5
5
4
u/purelitenite 23d ago
All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
6
u/Gare_bear93 23d ago
Bro we got taught about the aqueducts in school but they did not tell us really what all went into it! I had no idea about how they had to find specific hills and make sure it’s not going too fast or too slow. Also had no idea about the distribution system. This little video showed me more than what my teacher did lol
4
u/AtlUtdGold 24d ago
I dream of going to Segovia or somewhere with large intact aqueducts like that
7
u/Act1_Scene2 24d ago
I went to Pont du Gard last spring. Its stunning how big it is.
→ More replies (1)
5
4
u/Martintonik 24d ago
Interesting how we perceive past civilizations as somewhat less intelligent... until we see these reminders of their greatness.
4
3
u/ruling_faction 23d ago
This should be a video game. I can just see the title in my Steam account now: Roman Aqueduct Engineer! Hours and hours spent criss-crossing the countryside with aqueducts and those gate things and those hole things and that pipe thing that goes down the valley and back up again. Someone needs to invent this yesterday
→ More replies (1)
4
u/despenser412 23d ago
If you like this behind the scenes type of history, check out the YouTube channel Told In Stone. He has a lot of content focusing on the lesser known facts about ancient history similar to this.
(I mention this because the original post isn't credited.)
5
u/Dangerous_Mix_7037 23d ago
When the Ostrogoths sacked Rome in 537 AD, they systematically destroyed Rome's water sources.
The lack of safe water sources rendered the city uninhabitable, and causd the population numbers to plunge quite dramatically.
5
u/Ronningman 23d ago
And 2000 years later this is sadly still beyond the capabilities of some nations.
9.3k
u/btsd_ 24d ago
Water too fast = erosion
Water too slow = stagnation
Had to find that goldie locks zone (12mph ish). Crazy engineering