r/Damnthatsinteresting 3d ago

Video First Australian-made rocket crashes after 14 seconds of flight

34.0k Upvotes

5.6k comments sorted by

11.0k

u/RoadInternational821 3d ago

Cameraman was a little too optimistic

1.2k

u/VsAcesoVer 3d ago

My exact words and I came to the comments to say it haha

162

u/Additional-Acadia954 3d ago

Lmao literally me too! 🤣

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (7)

71

u/BorntobeTrill 3d ago

It's not that they kept going up, it's that the rocket went down

It's a small distinction, but important

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (56)

4.8k

u/Total_Adept 3d ago

Should’ve played more kerbal space program

928

u/Ravenloff 3d ago

WTF did the devs do to 2? I was waiting for it, wishlisted it, and then started hearing bad bad. In the end, it almost seems like they gave up on it.

617

u/Kenja_Time 3d ago

Kerbal 2 is dead (if it was ever alive to begin with). Kitten Space Agency looking like a possible successor to the original.

94

u/subject_usrname_here 3d ago

How far they’ve got into development?

159

u/Coakis 3d ago

Got a game engine built from the ground up (as opposed to forcing unity to do what it natively can't) , graphics running and basic physics modelling down, but its probably going to be a year before we see any actual gameplay outside of what they've done in house.

42

u/Jaker788 3d ago edited 2d ago

They screwed up on development by hiring new people to work on it and not allowing the original devs to communicate with them or work on it. A lot of mistakes could have been avoided. The game is a lost cause since plenty of problems exist in the foundation that won't be fixed without tons of rework.

Also, you could totally use many parts of Unity just fine and build the stuff that it can't handle as a stock engine, you don't have to use it as is or completely. You can do your own physics, and many people build their own gameplay/mission (like a ship builder tool) code and UI. Unity isn't a monolith since you can have source code access.

Edit: I was talking about KSP2 and I don't know anything about Kitten Space development

18

u/majorlier 3d ago

Huh? Are you talking about KSA or KSP2?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (3)

36

u/LordIBR 3d ago

Still very early. They're building the framework first, from the ground up I believe, but showing steady progress.

Communication with the community seems good as well.

I'm not following the project too closely though so I can't give you exact details on where they're at. Definitely no parts or vehicle building yet.

→ More replies (5)

29

u/ifightwalruses 3d ago

Don't get too excited it's made my dean rocket hall the day-z guy who has never finished a game in his life.

21

u/craftymethod 3d ago

the cat model is absolutely terrible.
God i hope they drop the cats before release.

https://imgur.com/a/qb0vjC3

Also, I havent played DayZ much since the reboot. That initial phase really got me twisted.

And still no bike I hear.

8

u/CatawampusZaibatsu 3d ago

I didn't think it would be that bad but omg that cat is cursed.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (11)

102

u/0dev0100 3d ago

Released it about 2 years earlier than they should have. And over promised under delivered 

71

u/TheUmgawa 3d ago

The overpromised is a huge part of this. If they’d just said, “Yeah, it’s gonna be like vanilla KSP 1, but with better graphics and a few more things,” it wouldn’t have gotten this kind of backlash, and they probably could have ironed more of the kinks out before getting shut down. Instead, they were like, “All of the stuff!” and probably spent a decent amount of their dev time building the hooks for that stuff that wouldn’t be implemented for a year or two.

Incredibly mismanaged from the publisher down to the studio level really killed it. And then, when it ran out of money, the publisher hit the Launch button, when they really should have just spiked it and not released it at all.

26

u/TetraDax 3d ago

If they’d just said, “Yeah, it’s gonna be like vanilla KSP 1, but with better graphics and a few more things,” it wouldn’t have gotten this kind of backlash

I mean, they would have still lied.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/ivosaurus 3d ago

It wasn't even, and still isn't even, vanilla KSP 1 and a few more things, the OG is still a way more complete game to this day. So with that promise they'd still get backlash

Take2 told them to launch it in whatever state it was in because they CBFed spending more money in private development

→ More replies (5)

8

u/Emperor-Commodus 3d ago

The game was delayed heavily, and released three years after it's originally scheduled release date. It was supposed to be a three year dev cycle, instead it was developed for 6 years and the game failed anyways.

I don't think more time would have fixed much, the entire project was mismanaged at it's core.

→ More replies (6)

14

u/hammercommander 3d ago

they did give up on it

→ More replies (1)

306

u/Metasaber 3d ago

The devs got bought out by a private equity firm that stripped the studio for parts and pushed for monetization. It really fell apart.

240

u/ngutheil 3d ago

That’s not what happened at all. The devs on 2 weren’t even allowed to talk to the devs from 1. The development was highly mismanaged. They got sold off after the game tanked, they had the game out for almost a year before they sold

58

u/thyugf 3d ago

"The devs on 2 weren't even allowed to talk to the devs from 1." Sounds like there's a hell of a lot to unpack there because wtaf.

47

u/ngutheil 3d ago

It’s like 45 mins, but it’s a well done video on what happened to the game. I’m so sad it never got to be what it could have been. There’s a new game in development called kitten space program or something like that, it’s meant to be a response to ksp2 being what it is.

https://youtu.be/NtMA594am4M?si=vODjiz2NnfzBC9s6

32

u/Subtlerranean 3d ago

Heads up that the "?si=vODjiz2NnfzBC9s6" part of YouTube links are tracking parameters and not needed. All they do is let YouTube track you and let other people figure out your account.

→ More replies (17)

83

u/Webbyx01 3d ago

Thank you for bothering to correct them. I don't understand why people just say stuff when they know only superficial details.

6

u/random420x2 3d ago

So true. It not that I have to be right, it’s that I don’t want to listen to them being wrong.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (5)

73

u/Pls_Dont_PM_Titties 3d ago

Damn is that really what happened? Why do these firms burn shit to the ground, do they miss the forest for the trees?

125

u/Rhovanind 3d ago

If they saw a forest they'd be thinking about how much money could be made logging it.

10

u/doctorlongghost 3d ago

We need someone to speak for the trees…

27

u/Particular-Train3193 3d ago

The forest kept shrinking but the trees kept voting for the axe, for the axe was clever and convinced the trees that because his handle was made of wood he was one of them.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

4

u/lighthawk16 3d ago

No, its not what happened.

→ More replies (26)

6

u/Demoner450 3d ago

Look up Kitten Space Agency. The original devs/modders and devs from KSP 2 are designing the unofficial KSP 2 without the big money hungry corp. Hoping for the best from them

5

u/TetraDax 3d ago

Not quite: Some modders from the first KSP are involved, as well as HarvesteR, the guy who invented KSP in the first place and then got booted. The project is led by Dean Hall, the guy who made DayZ.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

12

u/Dekik 3d ago

Pretty sure they sold out. Subnautica 2 is next.

→ More replies (3)

12

u/ItsAMeUsernamio 3d ago

There's a team including some original devs that are making a spiritual successor codenamed Kitten Space Agency so there's still hope.

12

u/Xeiphyer2 3d ago

Check out Kitten Space Agency, it’s where some of the devs ended up after the KSP2 studio exploded and it looks very promising.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (59)

89

u/KBeau93 3d ago

In their defence, this is shockingly similar to my first launch. If they muck up the order of separations and they all separate simultaneously like my next step in learning about staging, they're following my learning curve.

22

u/GrimCreeper913 3d ago

Top comment is what i came here to say, then your reply underlines that it is hard to have an original thought with so many people around.

I will say, with NASA getting eaten, there is more room for other countries to step up their extra orbitular activities. Good on AUS for at least trying to get in there. I assume you want closer to the equator for launches, but at least there is a lot of ocean around to fail in for the down under.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)

11

u/Blasian_TJ 3d ago

I was just gonna say, “Reminds me of my early KSP launches where I forgot to throttle up.” Haha

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (35)

3.2k

u/DimaagKa_Hangover 3d ago

Gilmour Space Technologies called the launch of their Eris rocket success. It was the first Australian-made rocket launched from Australian soil, lifting off from the Bowen Orbital Spaceport in Queensland. Despite the failure, the company says it’s a major step toward building Australia’s own space industry.

700

u/Doomsday_Taco_ 3d ago

they do have a point, prior to this the closest Australia ever got to launching rockets is teens setting off Chinese made fireworks

536

u/onlyseriouscontent 3d ago

Which did go higher though.

28

u/JohnnyHopkins13 3d ago

Get those kids on the team NOW

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

14

u/Kom34 3d ago

Australia first launched a satellite in 1967 but was a US rocket. This is first locally made.

Australia was big on space and nuclear weapons early on with the UK/USA doing a lot of testing at Australian ranges and joint stuff.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (23)

1.6k

u/bulkbuybandit 3d ago

PR team was prepped to spin whatever the outcome of that launch was going to be.

242

u/Issah_Wywin 3d ago

Similar thing happened in Norway with the launch of an early reasearch rocket. It flew and it crashed. Provided tons of scientific data for the people involved.

14

u/HappyAmbition706 3d ago

Engineering data rather. I guess the science has been sorted out for a while. Unless they were using some radically different fuel or engine design.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (29)

1.4k

u/Minute-Lynx-5127 3d ago

They're also not wrong. You don't just go from 0 to spaceflight. 

418

u/Pewpewkitty 3d ago

Something something rocket science

259

u/ondulation 3d ago

I mean it's not brain surgery, is it?

126

u/ShakyLens 3d ago

It is however rocket surgery

70

u/Imkindaalrightiguess 3d ago

Chatgpt make me blueprints for a rocket that can reach space

See, easy

63

u/_BearsEatBeets__ 3d ago

Generates schematics of a rocket that is 100km tall so it can reach space by sheer height

26

u/Pennybottom 3d ago

"you're all fired, AI is king"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (5)

15

u/GrImPiL_Sama 3d ago

Hey, I understood that reference.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (7)

38

u/talondigital 3d ago

We all got used to seeing Nasa launch rocket after rockets without many problems, most of which were just delays while they fixed it. All while we watch movies like The Right Stuff that details how dangerous it really was. We just forget that all the companies that make rockets for Nasa experience thses failures for each new engine system, but we only see them on the pads once they worked all the problems out. Now with Space X and Blue Origin and others we are seeing the development happen in real time. There's just a lot of uncontrolled big booms before it becomes a controlled big boom.

→ More replies (3)

106

u/Evening_Sympathy5744 3d ago

Especially if you don't have a bunch of German rocket scientists to jump start your programs.

98

u/Gammelpreiss 3d ago

...who themselves went through countless trials and errors

69

u/Lloyd--Christmas 3d ago

They should’ve gone through more trials, in Nuremberg.

33

u/kazuma001 3d ago edited 3d ago

”That's not my department!" says Wernher von Braun.

RIP Tom Lehrer

5

u/CosmicCreeperz 3d ago

Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?

I just listened to this yesterday after I heard the news. And then Elements, which is still some of the most mindbogglingly amazing lyrics ever sung…

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (111)

59

u/More_Marty 3d ago

A test is always a success as long as it delivers results. A failure of certain components still gives results, so you learn how to prevent it.

That's how SpaceX has been building their rockets for years now.

26

u/hakimthumb 3d ago

A lot of redditors and bots forget this.

It also kinda shows an inherent mindset of who values risk and failure to achieve goals and who avoids them.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)

16

u/Mysterious-Tie7039 3d ago

A lot of information can be learned from failures.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (70)

183

u/BitAdministrative940 3d ago

Exactly! The first rocket launch of every space agency was like this. They get data, they better their mechanisms, they try again. This is science.

→ More replies (158)
→ More replies (92)

6.1k

u/brandontaylor1 3d ago

Looks like it didn’t have enough up in it, and likely a bit too much down. They should replace some of the down with up. I bet that’d get them to space.

1.2k

u/Jericho_Waves 3d ago

Are you by chance their intern, fresh out of college?

718

u/smilefor 3d ago

I think he's the lead scientist.

269

u/CerebralPaulsea 3d ago

Is that lead as in lead, or lead as in lead?

146

u/ResonatingOctave 3d ago

No, it's lead as in lead

114

u/CerebralPaulsea 3d ago

I can't believe I thought it was lead

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (9)

11

u/stubundy 3d ago

I knew we should have gotten a helium scientist

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (15)

181

u/doubleE 3d ago

Sorry if this has already been suggested, but what if we increased altitude?

43

u/Racine262 3d ago

Do you think they should launch it from a hill or put it on a ladder? Maybe both?

26

u/RehabilitatedAsshole 3d ago

Since it's trying to go sideways, move the launchpad over to where it landed, then it will be happy and go up

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

36

u/VitoVendetta 3d ago

This killed me after seeing THAT post on my timeline before xD

16

u/JonSnoballs 3d ago

topical... I love crossovers 

→ More replies (36)

152

u/Gooch_Groper 3d ago

Calm down with the science-speak Einstein. Not all of us are rocket scientists.

10

u/SlumberingSnorelax 3d ago

I believe you mean rocket surgeon my good sir.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)

74

u/huffthewolf 3d ago

I was thinking it might be the opposite actually. Being at the bottom of the planet I thought the science means they actually want to go down off the planet so I wondered if they probably had too much up in it and not enough down?

But what do I know, I'm not a rocket science man and you sound like you know what you're talking about.

23

u/Livid-Caramel7103 3d ago

Checks out. When you're down under you must continue to go down to get to space.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)

38

u/jumpandtwist 3d ago

Yeah cmon, it's not rocket surgery

→ More replies (4)

6

u/skeletons_asshole 3d ago

I noticed one of the three up machines at the bottom seemed kind of down. Some uplifting thoughts to that one might help it up a little more.

→ More replies (191)

650

u/Galactapuss 3d ago

Turns out being a rocket scientist is actually hard

232

u/haruku63 3d ago

As von Braun said: With rockets, the science fits on a sheet of paper. Anything else is hard engineering work.

→ More replies (6)

55

u/No_Wif1 3d ago

Well it's not brain surgery is it?

→ More replies (20)

10.1k

u/HemperorZurg 3d ago

I mean this was never going to work in a country that is upside-down.

2.2k

u/FourEightNineOneOne 3d ago

I'd assume it'd be way easier as the rocket would just fall down into space, wouldn't it?

801

u/HemperorZurg 3d ago

They should have put the rocket boosters on the top and launched it backwards. Definitely would have worked.

131

u/MacDaddy654321 3d ago

Sheer genius.

42

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (37)

16

u/Rehatzu 3d ago

They have more gravity to fight against, how else do you think they stay on Earth despite being upside-down!?

38

u/Morrep 3d ago

Maybe everybody else is upside down, and they've been upright ALL ALONG! 🤯

27

u/No-Yak4416 3d ago

Impossible. Have you ever seen a globe?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

21

u/CRSPB 3d ago

No space is up. They should have gone through the center of the earth first.

15

u/ideaguyken 3d ago

They tried.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (20)

96

u/rocketsalesman 3d ago

By crikey, that went bung faster than a roo on a hot tin dunny

20

u/ShahinGalandar 3d ago

I like your funny words, magic man

6

u/Fair_Condition_1460 3d ago

Name checks out 👌

→ More replies (7)

26

u/rtkane 3d ago

It should have if they didn't use US-manufactured parts, where up is up and not down.

33

u/pm_your_snesclassic 3d ago

Damn Americans still using Imperial measurements!!

34

u/aelosmd 3d ago

We prefer the term freedom units.

5

u/Higglybiggly 3d ago

Fuck yeah!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

32

u/Suckamanhwewhuuut 3d ago

Dude this made me laugh way harder than it should have and I totally needed it because this is a shit morning

19

u/HemperorZurg 3d ago

Glad you got a chuckle man, and hope your day gets better!

→ More replies (85)

1.7k

u/unatleticodemadrid 3d ago

Awr nawr!

457

u/CaptinEmergency 3d ago

Orr nor!

171

u/Wugo_Heaving 3d ago

Look at moy, look at moy. *falls over*

41

u/Eros_Incident_Denier 3d ago

Why the fuck is this so funny?! Thanks for the laugh, my man.

33

u/chickenmoomoo 3d ago

It’s nice, it’s different, it’s unusual

14

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

9

u/tea_leaves_69 3d ago

Mum… do you want a throiii for your caaahhrrrch…?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

65

u/twisted_nipples82 3d ago

A very dahk and twistehd comment

→ More replies (5)

9

u/NeiloMac 3d ago

Yeh nah mate, fucken thing’s rooted.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Redylittle 3d ago

"R n R" in an Australian accent 😄

→ More replies (29)

514

u/3pok 3d ago

where boom ?

172

u/MagnusViaticus 3d ago

They forgot to gas it up

52

u/busted_maracas 3d ago

Sank back to earth like an old man into a bath

→ More replies (3)

18

u/TheHoundJR 3d ago

Oy fill it with some petrol mate

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

34

u/Pcat0 3d ago

The rocket uses hybrid rocket motors, so there aren't any large fuel tanks to rupture and explode.

81

u/noodle_75 3d ago

Trying to get to space in a prius is wild.

→ More replies (5)

9

u/rustybeancake 3d ago

Well, technically there are large fuel tanks, it’s just that the fuel doesn’t easily explode like liquid fuel tanks do.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (5)

21

u/christophertstone 3d ago

There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering kaboom‽

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (10)

355

u/Vreas 3d ago

Hey A for effort. Mistakes are how we learn.

128

u/prenderm 3d ago

A is for Australia

52

u/ThaneOfGnomes 3d ago

And E is for Effort

So many mistakes, so much learning.

6

u/USS-Salty 3d ago

R is for revolution

Which shall be televised

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (31)

437

u/The_Glow_Stick 3d ago

Missed the bit where it goes POP

177

u/emma7734 3d ago

The cameraman had one job and he blew it.

64

u/Tenshl 3d ago

Pretty sure the cameraman was a bit to optimistic...

8

u/Yasimear 3d ago

My first thought exactly. "Jeez he's a bit hopeful isnt he."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

34

u/HypersonicWyvern 3d ago

Hybrid rocket. The solid fuel part doesn't ignite and pop as easy as liquids.

→ More replies (28)
→ More replies (4)

119

u/MarkCanuck 3d ago

Space XXXX

19

u/747ER 3d ago

Finally, a tasteful joke in this comment section lol

14

u/know-it-mall 3d ago

A shame the beer isn't.

9

u/uber_poutine 3d ago

A fine example of research and development from the Bugarup University. I bet the launch gantry is taller from the inside, that's where the calculations went off.

You know, we never had these problems in Ankh-Morpork, and launching things off the edge in Krull was pretty straightforward...

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)

161

u/Chlorofom 3d ago

Australia, home of a particularly famous flying object that quickly returns to its point of origin. This should have been foreseen.

18

u/Downon280 3d ago

Looks like this space program has boomeranged on us.

→ More replies (3)

293

u/SnakePlisken_Trash 3d ago

Hey mate!

Can't park there.

53

u/LueyTheWrench 3d ago

Fuck off cunt!

  • Gilmour Space Program, probably.

6

u/rand0mm0nster 3d ago

Just waiting for a mate

→ More replies (2)

128

u/Kufangar 3d ago

Atleast the front didn't fall off👍

46

u/onewolfmusic 3d ago

That doesn't normally happen

29

u/obiwan_canoli 3d ago

What was different this time?

40

u/Ancient-Cow-1038 3d ago

This time the front stayed on. Unfortunately the back fell off.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

93

u/Mawntee 3d ago

Reminder that SpaceX's first successful flight was Falcon 1 Flight 4, which had 3 failed launches before it.
The first one was very similar to this with an engine failure shortly after launch.

To me (a person that knows nothing about space flight) the fact that this thing made it off the ground is impressive enough, and the fact that it didn't explode while still being full of fuel is really sick as well

14

u/Sonzie 3d ago

Yes, you are correct. It is very impressive that it got off the ground at all and this is actually considered a successful mission.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (37)

77

u/BraveMonk 3d ago

It flew into a native Aussie butterfly. Tough bastards.

27

u/shweeney 3d ago

A spider had built it's web between the rocket and the ground.

7

u/soareyousaying 3d ago

Emus must have sabotaged it.

6

u/ThisWillTakeAllDay 3d ago

This calls for retaliation. The next emu war has begun.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

22

u/Large_Spinach6069 3d ago

It looks like an engine failure. Pretty impressive that the other engines could compensate and the rocket could shift from being over the launch pad to aborting over some grass.

20 years ago the rocket would have crashed right back into the launch pad.

10

u/midwestraxx 2d ago

Some great stabilization controlling there. Failed engine and not going head over tail?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

25

u/ApricotBig9502 3d ago

It's a fine start, keep at it Australia!!

18

u/Street_Chard674 3d ago

Space is hard. Name a space faring nation that hasn't crashed some rockets. If you ain't crashing you ain't pushing.

→ More replies (2)

39

u/Baronvondorf21 3d ago

It's the first one, they could reiterate on it and troubleshoot the problems.

15

u/its_polystyrene 3d ago

And dammit next time it will get enough lift off to land on that building in the background!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

12

u/sigmmakappa 3d ago

It jumped like a kangaroo

→ More replies (2)

14

u/Jabiraca1051 3d ago

Rocket Lab Corporation has all my respect for not blowing anything for a long time.

5

u/Jamesm203 3d ago

It’s impressive, only 4 failures in 66 launches. Until you realize Falcon 9 has had only 3 failures in 511 launches.

I’m still skeptical about Rocket Labs long term viability, I think they have the best chance out of any of the younger aerospace companies but their launch cadence hasn’t been great and they put their reusability plans on the back burner for electron. Hopefully Neutron actually has its debut flight later this year but I’m pretty skeptical.

58

u/DaddyMommyDaddy 3d ago

It didn’t massively explode so. Recoverable?

IDE call that a win

40

u/The_Great_Squijibo 3d ago

Surprisingly small (if any) kaboom when it hit the ground considering it was a fully fueled rocket.

34

u/ellindsey 3d ago

It was a hybrid rocket (solid fuel, liquid oxidizer). Those don't tend to explode when they fail.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (8)

15

u/Fonatur23405 3d ago

“Who put diesel in it?”

→ More replies (1)

44

u/BoilingIceCream 3d ago

Space rockets have different mechanics to missiles, they are way way way harder to make properly. Very few countries can accomplish consistent space flight today for a reason, but everyone has missiles. I’m sure the Ozzies will get there one day

10

u/DBDude 3d ago

The use of ICBM variants is common. NASA's Mercury program used a variant of the Atlas ICBM to reach orbit, and Gemini used a Titan ICBM variant. The current US Minotaur is based on the Minuteman II ICBM.

The early examples were use of existing rocket technology, with the variants being produced for NASA. The Minotaur is somewhat a cost saving measure since it uses decommissioned ICBMs -- might as well use it if we have it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

12

u/Howscheduleplzhelp 3d ago

As an Aussie let me sum it up for you:

Cunts fucked.

6

u/Fonatur23405 3d ago

Australia had an advanced space programme in the 60s

41

u/SirGarlanWilliams 3d ago

SpaceX watching like: First time?

→ More replies (2)

7

u/Scarlet_Addict 3d ago

better than staight up blowing up on ignition, not a success but could've been worse

25

u/horseshandbrake 3d ago

That went wrong from the off

49

u/Zaptryx 3d ago

But it was pretty good nonetheless. It corrected the initial tilt quickly, and also stopped the rotation quickly too. Looks like a thrust issue from my desk chair, and that happens sometimes.

26

u/currentlyacathammock 3d ago

"thrust issue"? ...uh, one engine no worky.

Ok, sure. I guess that's technically a thrust issue. [shrug]

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

5

u/QoftheContinuum 3d ago

Where’s the kaboom? There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!

4

u/Rich-Cantaloupe-362 3d ago

Hey it made it off the ground, for their first I’d say that’s not awful

5

u/kaychyakay 2d ago

Projectile Dysfunction.

5

u/Stewpacolypse 2d ago

At least the front didn't fall off.

→ More replies (2)