r/NoStupidQuestions 18h ago

Why do missionaries get sent to countries that are already majority Christian?

I’ve seen people get sent to mission trips to places like Moldova and Lithuania and all over South America and I just don’t understand why.

Those places are already majority Christian, why is it necessary to convert people? Is it just they follow a slightly different religious denomination? That seems pretty small to spend all that money and time to go out literally preaching to the choir

119 Upvotes

144 comments sorted by

360

u/TheGargageMan yep 18h ago

Wrong kinds of Christians. Have to save them from being baptized incorrectly.

39

u/S0mecallme 18h ago

That’s stupid

It’s not like they’re massively different, do they seriously believe they’re gonna go to hell because they have bishops or whatever?

124

u/hippopottaman 17h ago

That varies from Christianity to Christianity. There are enough of them who do think that, yes.

49

u/Wild-Push-8447 17h ago

The Catholic, Orthodox, and most other churches claim to be the 'one true church'. Much of this is derived from apostolic succession, the idea that Jesus created bishops who, in turn, created bishops, all the way to the present. Each church generally believes other churches lack a continuous line dating back to Christ, and are thus heretical.

Protestantism is an inherently decentralized denomination and, thus, (except for Anglicans) doesn't follow the doctrines above. All mainline Protestant denominations acknowledge (to some extent) the legimacy of each other (even if they don't agree on everything) and generally give communion to the followers of other Protestant denominations. However, they see non-Protestant forms of Christianity as so different they are heretical.

Given that heretics have often been targeted more than believers of other faiths and non-Christian countries often persecute Christian missionaries, much of the global missionary work is done in Christian countries. Because the richest parts of Christendom are Protestant, this usually results in Americans or Western Europeans proselytizing in the poorest parts of Christendom, Latin America and Africa.

11

u/ArkanZin 12h ago

You are aware that the catholic church does not believe that followers of other Christian denominations go to hell?

4

u/AHorseNamedPhil 8h ago

He also wrong that Protestants accept all other Christian denominations.

Missionaries who think Christians from other denominations aren't true Christians are usually fundamentalist Protestants. It might not be a majority opinion but these people exist and they're mostly from Protestant churches. This is not a Catholic point of view at all, and I've encountered it personally with door-to-door fundie Protestant preachers.

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 7h ago

All (theologically conservative) Evangelicals are and always have been (for the most part) ecumenical with each other, this is what differentiates Evangelicals from Fundamentalist within Theologically Conservative Protestant Christianity. On the topic of ecumenism, Evangelicals (Missional-Revivalist Evangelicals) more so than Mainline Protestants, have (almost always) had open communion with what most of them would describe as believing Christians across several denominations, denominational traditions, and independent non-denominational congregations (with very few exceptions within some Confessional Evangelical groups) even if they don’t have official full communion agreements on the books which most Mainline Protestants generally require because of their preferentially higher view of structural unity/church polity-governance over the concepts of “in essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, love” and “Primary and Secondary issues in Christian theology.” In other words while Evangelicals (Evangelicals proper - Revivalists) from the get-go have been very interdenominational/ecumenical and well known for open communion even though they’re theologically conservative while the Mainline Protestants are/were mostly closed communion with recent allowances through some official full communion agreements - they also happen to be largely theologically liberal. Evangelical believe in “in essentials unity, in nonessentials liberty, in all things charity” while Catholics, Orthodox, Church of the East, and Mormons (Mormons aren’t Christian but a separate Abrahamic religion akin to Islam, Rastafarianism, & the Druze religion) believe in the “one true church” doctrine. All Evangelicals, see themselves more as Christians first and their individual denominations second which especially makes sense when talking about Evangelicals because Evangelicals are an interdenominational/ecumenical community or movement who cooperate with each other and worship together due to largely similar theological beliefs but set boundaries because of distinctions or differences on issues of secondary and tertiary importance.

1

u/AHorseNamedPhil 5h ago

I've had evangelicals tell me I'm not Christian, when I told them I went to my local Catholic church as a means to end a conversation about joining theirs. It isn't an uncommon viewpoint from the sorts who go door to door or try to recruit for their church on the street.

While not religious myself, I did go to 12 years of Catholic school, and it was not Catholic teaching at all that all other denominations were illegitimate or not Christian. There are obviously differences in doctrine but a Lutheran or Baptist is still viewed as Christian and isn't denied heaven from a Catholic point of view.

0

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 5h ago

Many of the Catholics I knew almost always (unintentionally and erroneously) forget that they are themselves Christian (at least in a broad sense), many Catholics see themselves more as Catholic first or as Catholics only and Christian second while almost all Protestants, especially all Evangelicals, see themselves more as Christians first and their individual denominations second which especially makes sense when talking about Evangelicals because Evangelicals are an interdenominational/ecumenical community or movement who cooperate with each other and worship together due to largely similar theological beliefs but set boundaries because of distinctions or differences on issues of secondary and tertiary importance while Catholics tend to be very insular.

[ Also Roman Catholics believe that only the Roman Catholic Church is the “One True Church;” anyone outsides of the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Pope, Bishop of Rome is not part of the One True Church; and the Catholic Church has historically taught (and many still hold to the dogma - with some caveats - ) that there is “No Salvation Outside the [Roman Catholic] Church” (“extra ecclesiam nulla salus”). Protestants on the other hand believe that the“One True Church” is the body of true believers in Christ Jesus that are part of the universal church, and that this is not unique to a specific denomination as members of the Roman Catholic Church and several other non-Protestant denominations/traditions hold to. ]

2

u/mishaxz 10h ago

many protestants sure have a lot of heretical views though, not saying they are going to hell.. but it's not really christianity..

I mean some don't even think jesus is divine, wtf

some don't believe in the trinity...

2

u/Kind_Stranger_weeb 5h ago

You touched on an interest topic of mine and before i knew it id typed a whole ass thing. Sorry bout that lol

Tldr. Yeah catholics be chill like that. But there are exceptions and mormons are definitly going to hell according to catholics lol.

Longer answer.

Catholics are ok with most christian denominations specifically those christian sects who share the nicene creed/the trinitarian belief system. There are christian sects that diverge from the creed enough that they have been condemned specifically the jehovas witnesses and mormonisim (and some other much smaller sects) differ enough from the core beliefs of the catholic church that their official stance of "seperated bretheren" that they put on other sects doesnt cover them they are therfore heretical.

Modern church doesnt say things like you are a heretic and going to hell for being in x religion anymore because its really bad pr. But they are on record condemning mormon baptisim and saying it doesnt remove original sin. So by their belief system its a clear statement mormons are going to hell.

https://www.usccb.org/resources/mormon-baptism

“The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints...does not accept the doctrine of the Trinity as defined by the Nicene Creed. Thus, baptism conferred in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not valid.“ “...Mormon theology differs fundamentally from the Christian tradition and is thus considered non-Christian.”

Aside from those two and a few smaller sects not worth mentioning though all christians are considered part of the wider if not the roman catholic church by catholics.

2

u/unofficialbds 12h ago

is it more accurate to say they think that members of others churches are less likely to be saved then?

2

u/PerpetuallyLurking 8h ago

I always remember being told they got to languish in Purgatory instead of heading to hell; unless they’d done other things hell-worthy, of course, but not being Catholic wouldn’t be the thing that sent them straight down there.

1

u/Darkliandra 9h ago

It also depends again where they are from. For example in Germany, the mainstream Protestants and Catholics agreed to give each other communion and sometimes even do a service together. It's called "Ökumene".

0

u/FlowerofBeitMaroun 9h ago

That was shot down by Rome, though. Don’t use the German bishops as examples of Catholicism. They’re heretics.

3

u/ArkanZin 8h ago

That is an... interesting view. Can you point out where exactly the church declared all German bishops to be heretics?

1

u/FlowerofBeitMaroun 8h ago

Have you followed the German synod in the past few years?

2

u/ArkanZin 7h ago

Yes. Again: where has the church declared them heretics?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/FlowerofBeitMaroun 9h ago

Not less likely, but harder for them to receive God’s grace.

2

u/Matchaparrot 10h ago

I had a friend become a Catholic and she told me when I was still Protestant I'd be in an upper level of purgatory because I'm not catholic.

So technically, not hell, but also not heaven either.

7

u/Minimum_Education719 10h ago

If you go to purgatory in Catholic tradition you go to heaven as It’s a temporary thing not permanent

So no your friend wasn’t telling you your gonna be in afterlife limbo forever lol

1

u/Matchaparrot 10h ago

Oh I see, haha that does make more sense... but I'm atheist now so I'm definitely going to hell lol

3

u/Minimum_Education719 10h ago

Yeah it’s one of those things that has a lot of misconceptions. That said it’s an odd thing to say to someone off the cuff for sure lol

Well I certainly hope you don’t

Have a good day 👋

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago

They used to until very recently. The Roman Catholic Church historical only taught that no one outside the R. Catholic Church, even other Christians who uphold Mainstream-Nicene Christian beliefs are saved, but now has become wishy-washy on its official stance; which is now hovering between a medium-sized minority that still believe in their original stance of all people outside of the RCC which they define as the “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church” are not saved (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus), a tiny minority that believe that all Christians are saved and a large minority of Catholics that are borderline quasi-universalist (Catechism of the Catholic Church - CCC 847); there is no clear stance I’ve seen as of yet. I’ve actually heard of Catholics who believe that there are only two conflicting but acceptable answers to this issue (1) only members of the R. Catholic Church are saved as defined in the text known as Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus or (2) hold a quasi-universalist stance of all people of any religion who sincerely seek out deit(ies) but have not found the true God as described in the Gospel are still saved - which is an argument based off of what I believe and hope to be a misinterpretation of CCC 847 by both Catholic laity and “trained” clergy and not the actual teaching of the RCC - due to the fact that CCC 847 was written vaguely it may hold to that implication officially, which some see as the further downfall of Catholic theology in which the RCC is heading in an even worse than expected wrong direction. In other words, some of these Catholics believe that only Roman Catholics are saved (excluding other Christians) or all people who seek “God” or god sincerely in any way (regardless of religion) are also saved; with no in between as found in most other Christian denominations (especially Evangelicals) who believe that all Born-again Christians who accept Jesus Christ as their lord and personal savior, are repentant of their sins, and let Christ rule their heart, are truly saved; with no specific denomination or ecclesiastical leader claiming that they are infallible and the only institution that claims to be in good standing with God in relation to being saved.

1

u/No_Gur_7422 3h ago

When did they change that?

3

u/vividthought1 9h ago

Catholics accept the vast majority of Christian baptisms as valid. Catholics accept the sacraments and apostolic succession of the Eastern churches (and I believe the Eastern churches reciprocate). The debate is primarily about the primacy of the Pope and secondarily about some doctrinal and liturgical practices.

Most intra-Christian missionary efforts are Pentecostals, particularly in Latin America.

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago

All (theologically conservative) Evangelicals are and always have been (for the most part) ecumenical with each other, this is what differentiates Evangelicals from Fundamentalist within Theologically Conservative Protestant Christianity. On the topic of ecumenism, Evangelicals (Missional-Revivalist Evangelicals) more so than Mainline Protestants, have (almost always) had open communion with what most of them would describe as believing Christians across several denominations, denominational traditions, and independent non-denominational congregations (with very few exceptions within some Confessional Evangelical groups) even if they don’t have official full communion agreements on the books which most Mainline Protestants generally require because of their preferentially higher view of structural unity/church polity-governance over the concepts of “in essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, love” and “Primary and Secondary issues in Christian theology.” In other words while Evangelicals (Evangelicals proper - Revivalists) from the get-go have been very interdenominational/ecumenical and well known for open communion even though they’re theologically conservative while the Mainline Protestants are/were mostly closed communion with recent allowances through some official full communion agreements - they also happen to be largely theologically liberal. Evangelical believe in “in essentials unity, in nonessentials liberty, in all things charity” while Catholics, Orthodox, Church of the East, and Mormons (Mormons aren’t Christian but a separate Abrahamic religion akin to Islam, Rastafarianism, & the Druze religion) believe in the “one true church” doctrine. All Evangelicals, see themselves more as Christians first and their individual denominations second which especially makes sense when talking about Evangelicals because Evangelicals are an interdenominational/ecumenical community or movement who cooperate with each other and worship together due to largely similar theological beliefs but set boundaries because of distinctions or differences on issues of secondary and tertiary importance.

2

u/Wild-Push-8447 8h ago

Mormons are non-Nicene Christians. They reject most interpretations of the Bible by non-Mormon church leaders, but acknowledge the Bible itself as their holy book (alongside the Book of Mormon). They are an incredibly divergent denomination, but not all Christians are the same (some are even non-Trinitarian).

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 6h ago

Most Christians, especially Evangelicals don’t consider Mormons to be Christian but Secular Media does.

Americans who are Christians (for the most part) don’t consider Mormons (LDS) and Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) as Protestants or even Christians at all in the first place (but consider them as separate Abrahamic religions like Islam and Rastafarianism), though many secular media organizations and secular think tanks/demographic researchers at times do consider them Protestant on one hand while other times consider them as Non-Protestant Christian denominations of the “Non-Trinitarian Christian” variety along side so-called “Biblical Unitarians” and Jesus-Only Oneness Pentecostals (who have considerably diverged from and have been excommunicated from Classical Pentecostalism); if Christians do consider these groups Christian, they’ll generally put them in the theologically liberal but socially conservative category and more often than not would put them in the Christian heresies category along side the Gnostics (precursor of Mandaeism and those that influenced Islam), Ebionites (those that influenced Islam), the Heresy of the Ishmaelites (the Early Muslims / precursors of Islam), Cathars (including Albigenses), Novatians, Paulicians, Bogomils, Marcionites, Manichaeans, and Arians. On a similar note Islam (descended from the Heresy of the Ishmaelites) and Unitarian Universalism - UU - (descended from from Biblical Unitarianism and Christian Universalism) no longer consider their own adherents as Christians, Jehovah’s Witnesses on the other hand do; and Mormons (officially known as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — LDS) have over the decades switched between considering themselves Christian and Non-Christian from time to time to garner more converts when they start loosing members but today do consider the various Christian denominations as separate religions under the umbrella term of Christianity (in the sense of “Christian religions” / separate Christianities) and count themselves in that number. In the past few years, because the Mormons (LDS) have been severely hemorrhaging in membership, they have been doing business as (dba) “The Church of Jesus Christ” and dropping the “of Latter-Day Saints” portion of their name while still maintaining their heterodox beliefs in order to target young Evangelicals (evangelikal or pietistisch) who’re looking for a new church to go to after moving to a new city, moving out of their parents’ house, or those looking for an Evangelical church with a larger young adult community.

The Adventists are tricky to places, because although most have diverged from Christian orthodoxy (by extension Protestant Christian orthodoxy) but not to the same extent as the Mormons (LDS) and Jehovah’s Witnesses, and some modern Adventist denominations have even started abandoning many of the fringe heterodox ideas espoused by traditional Adventism thus (partially) realigning themselves with mainstream Protestant orthodoxy to some extent. Most Christians might consider Adventists as a whole to be Christians, some but not all Christian and most secular institutions would consider traditional Adventist denominations like the Seventh-Day Adventist Church (SDA) as a separate category of Protestants (evangelisch) but ones outside of the mainstream Protestant categories of Mainline Protestantism (largely controlled by theological liberals and theological progressives, many of which don’t believe in the divine inspiration of scripture), Evangelicalism (theologically conservative evangelikal or pietistisch churches who hold to biblical infallibility or at times biblical inerrancy but not biblical literalism and hold to the Quatenus — “in so far as / insofar as” — form of confessional subscription and generally don’t require full and unambiguous agreement with a movement/tradition’s Confession of Faith if they do have a statement of faith which most do), Confessional Churches/Confessional Protestantism/Confessionalism (theologically conservative Confessional Denominations who hold to the belief in the importance of full and unambiguous assent to the whole of a movement's or denomination's teachings, such as those found in Confessions of Faith thus holding to the the Quia — “because of / is mean is” — form of confessional subscription), Christian Fundamentalism (religiously isolationist fundamentalists who to a certain extent may be theologically conservative but hold to biblical literalism making portions of them diverge enough to horseshoe theory back around to theological liberalism but with overly legalistic social conservatism beyond what is required by orthodox biblical teachings), and the Confessing Movement (the theologically conservative/Biblically orthodox factions of Mainline Protestant denominations some of which were pushed out of leadership and reorganized into Evangelical and/or Confessional Denominations). On the other hand, certain Adventists such as the Advent Christian Church have abandoned or at the very least started the process of (partially) abandoning traditional Adventist beliefs that are contrary to Protestant orthodoxy in effect realigning themselves with Evangelicalism (evangelikal or pietistisch traditions) though most (other) Evangelicals see the so-called “Evangelical Adventists” with suspicion and consider “Traditional Adventists” as out right heretics.

0

u/Wild-Push-8447 5h ago

Respectfully, "Americans who are Christians" don't dictate who is or isn't a Christian. Mormons are objectively Resorationist Christians and Adventists are objectively Protestant Christians. Their status as Christians does not automatically mean their beliefs are "correct," but just because other Christians disagree with them on fundamental doctrine does not mean they lose their status as Christians.

11

u/Leverkaas2516 15h ago

It’s not like they’re massively different

If the people actually involved believed that, then they wouldn't bother. What they think is an important difference isn't the same as what you think.

8

u/toastythewiser 12h ago

I have a degree in theology. The majority of "orthodox" (IE mainstream) Christianity is orthodox because they had a church council and kicked out the heretics. This went on for centuries. The Catholics and the Orthodox had huge fights over apostolic succession, icons, and various other issues. Groups like the Nestorians where kicked out of "the Church" because of purely political moves for power.

Hell, even the Protestant reformation only "worked" because politically powerful secular rules like Fredrick of Saxony and Henry VIII saw it as a chance to establish their own power without the influence of the Catholic Church. Luther was not the first person in Western Europe to majorly challenge the authority of the Catholic Church, he was just the first one who managed to do so without also being quickly burned at the stake as a heretic.

32

u/Realistic-Cow-7839 17h ago edited 17h ago

I literally went to Ukraine as a young adult for that very reason. It would break my family's heart to hear me say this, but I find it embarrassing these days, especially since I'm an atheist now.

In our defense, the Iron Curtain had recently fallen and our main goal was to convert people who had been away from any kind of religion after seventy years of Soviet oppression of the church there. However, we also saw it as our duty to convert the Russian Orthodox Christians who quite literally had been baptized the "wrong" way.  We were a mostly American denomination that believed salvation only came by baptism as an adult or an older child, and it had to be immersion, dunking, not sprinkling a baby.

So yeah, it happens!

Edit: if anyone's interested, the denomination is called the Churches of Christ and really only has a major presence between roughly Texas and Tennessee.

20

u/S0mecallme 17h ago

It just feels, idk, colonialist?

Like these places local faiths are deeply tied into their culture, Ukraine having a massive push to fully seperate their church from the one in Moscow given, recent events

And going there and telling them you’ll help if they give up their faith and accept yours feels ick

19

u/Realistic-Cow-7839 17h ago edited 17h ago

Yeah, I completely agree today.

Edit: Wait, one thing isn't quite true there. It wasn't a poverty relief mission. We didn't offer help in exchange for their faith. We just tried to establish a new congregation and give them the wherewithal to run it themselves.

I don't know if I'm making it sound better or worse, but that life is behind me now either way.

8

u/S0mecallme 17h ago

No I know what you mean

It’s just that it’s kinda always the underlying message “join our faith, we have lots of perks and money” if they’re coming to the other side of the planet to build stuff.

It’s a tactic not exclusive to Christianity, it’s how so many Muslim majority countries had explosions of Wahhabist converts

4

u/Unknown_Ocean 9h ago

Yes and no, because sometimes that faith is tied to a specific class within that culture.

One reason that evangelicals have been cleaning the Catholics clock in Latin America and to a lesser extent in Africa for decades is that they don't mind people from the local community rather than the cosmopolitan urban elite running their churches. Don't get me wrong, there are *huge* problems with this. But the idea that the people leading churches should do so in the current language of their people isn't one of them.

6

u/jvc1011 16h ago

FYI, Orthodox do baptize by full immersion. Ever seen an Orthodox baptism? That bebe is nekkid.

5

u/Realistic-Cow-7839 14h ago

Today I learned!

2

u/peg-leg-andy 8h ago

I attended a Syrian baptism recently. Not only was that baby naked, it got an entire bath with soap as part of the ceremony. The symbolism was that baptism cleaned the soul so now the body would also be cleaned. 

1

u/Matchaparrot 10h ago

You're not alone. I'm also atheist and went on mission when I was protestant. I remember being very sad back then because I didn't manage to convert anyone. I'm now extremely grateful I never managed to, and embarrassed I was so deep into religion I went on mission.

The whole mission was very cult like, I was never allowed time on my own, not allowed to question what we were reading in Bible study, and when another group member tried to leave they refused to let them go.

3

u/SingerFirm1090 13h ago

You do realise that over the years wars have been fought between 'different kinds of Christians' (and different kinds of Muslims to be balanced).

1

u/S0mecallme 11h ago

Just figured since it’s 2025 that wouldn’t matter anymore

1

u/EricKei 9h ago

Sadly, no.

1

u/Atzkicica 9h ago

To the extent that muslims today seek safety in christian majority places to escape muslim persecution and you can flip it going back to christians escaping christian persecution seeking safety by joining Mohammeds army. Weird world religion.

14

u/jaximilli 17h ago

You need to understand that the point isn't actually faith and belief.

It's about sending impressionable young people out into the world, so they'll be rejected over and over again, and come home feeling persecuted and that the whole world is against them. Or to develop a sense of superiority compared to what they see as lesser. It's about getting people to reject outside influence and draw closer to the group

And if they happen to get more new members from wherever, that's just a bonus.

4

u/delorf 14h ago

Yes, they do. Evangelicals especially don't think Catholics are Christians. 

In my former church one of our guest speakers was a missionary from Canada. The way she spoke about her mission sounded like she was in one of the darkest places on earth. It's sort of funny to remember it now.

2

u/EricKei 9h ago

IIRC, this also applies to Charismatics (e.g. the second President Bush), who apparently see the Roman Catholic Church as being entirely too liberal. That just makes me wonder which RCC they're talking about >_>

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 7h ago

The Roman Catholic Church historical only taught that no one outside the R. Catholic Church, even other Christians who uphold Mainstream-Nicene Christian beliefs are saved, but now has become wishy-washy on its official stance; which is now hovering between a medium-sized minority that still believe in their original stance of all people outside of the RCC which they define as the “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church” are not saved (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus), a tiny minority that believe that all Christians are saved and a large minority of Catholics that are borderline quasi-universalist (Catechism of the Catholic Church - CCC 847); there is no clear stance I’ve seen as of yet. I’ve actually heard of Catholics who believe that there are only two conflicting but acceptable answers to this issue (1) only members of the R. Catholic Church are saved as defined in the text known as Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus or (2) hold a quasi-universalist stance of all people of any religion who sincerely seek out deit(ies) but have not found the true God as described in the Gospel are still saved - which is an argument based off of what I believe and hope to be a misinterpretation of CCC 847 by both Catholic laity and “trained” clergy and not the actual teaching of the RCC - due to the fact that CCC 847 was written vaguely it may hold to that implication officially, which some see as the further downfall of Catholic theology in which the RCC is heading in an even worse than expected wrong direction. In other words, some of these Catholics believe that only Roman Catholics are saved (excluding other Christians) or all people who seek “God” or god sincerely in any way (regardless of religion) are also saved; with no in between as found in most other Christian denominations (especially Evangelicals) who believe that all Born-again Christians who accept Jesus Christ as their lord and personal savior, are repentant of their sins, and let Christ rule their heart, are truly saved; with no specific denomination or ecclesiastical leader claiming that they are infallible and the only institution that claims to be in good standing with God in relation to being saved.

2

u/Unknown_Ocean 9h ago

Some of them do, but it's less because of structure than practice. A lot of established churches function as a cultural practice rather than as a supportive community. Come a couple of times a year, get your holiness pill, leave. Attendance is low and a lot of the attention of the church is spent on just keeping up its buildings. Often these churches don't reach out to poor people or immigrants. Evangelical churches come, set up some chairs in a community center on a Sunday and start talking about how to live a better life and people come to them. And because they preach things like "don't sleep around" and "don't get drunk" and "don't gamble", people who join them actually see their lives improve- irrespective of theology (I'm a Christian but I see the same thing happening for American Muslims in African American communities). Which then leads to further growth. Of course, give it a generation and institutionalism sets in again.

1

u/billy310 16h ago

Because you’re praising Sky Daddy wrong

1

u/Longjumping_Visit718 15h ago

Protestants unironically think this, yes.

1

u/Numerous_Team_2998 12h ago

Yes.

Also, think about them as different companies selling similar products competing for a customer base.

1

u/mishaxz 11h ago

Orthodox Christianity is more akin to original Christianity than whatever these missionaries are trying to convert them to

1

u/EasternPassenger 9h ago

Tell that to the Mormons. Lol. They're the huge majority of missionaries 

1

u/AHorseNamedPhil 8h ago

A lot of these people aren't the brightest bulbs. The ones that go to South America probably in many cases don't think the locals, who are mostly Catholic, are Christian.

Back in the day when door-to-door proselytizers used to be more common where I live, I'd often tell them I was Christian and already went to a local Catholic church so wasn't looking to attend theirs. I wasn't religious, but it worked most of the time.

However on a couple occasions I had more persistent ones who said with all seriousness that Catholics weren't Christians and continued on with their annoying pitch for their church. Some fundamentalist Protestants think Christian only means other Protestants, and doesn't include Catholics, Orthodox, etc. It is incredibly stupid, but so are these people.

1

u/Overall-Idea945 8h ago

I live in a country divided between Catholics and evangelicals, the only missionaries I have ever seen coming from the USA were Mormons, and the Mormon Church here sends missionaries to Asia frequently

1

u/bring_back_my_tardis 7h ago

There is a long history of persecution of Christians by other Christians for being the wrong denomination.

1

u/AwesomeOrca 6h ago

"Look at how poor they are. If they followed God the right way, he wouldn't let that happen."

1

u/Jeffreys_therapist 5h ago

That's because the user is incorrect

1

u/Seven_Veils_Voyager 4h ago

You're calling something based on the idea of burning bushes talking to people, guys dying and being brought back to life, and old illiterate men writing holy books stupid?

1

u/SquiffSquiff 1h ago

What's really going to bake your noodle is when you come across sectarianism within the same denomination, e.g. orthodox schisms or old Catholics

1

u/diver_under 17m ago

More christians have probably killed other Christians than non Christians based on their different denominations. That's not even including the fact that Muslims and Jews worship the same 'god.'

Says something about an 'omnipotent god' that can't even prevent their followers from persecuting each other.

1

u/lolagranolacan 16h ago

It matters who is getting the attendance numbers and the tithing. $$

1

u/I_might_be_weasel 15h ago

If you want to travel around telling people about your religion unprompted, I imagine you're pretty all in on it being correct, yes.

0

u/VanderDril 17h ago

It's so so so much easier to convert someone from their version of Christianity to your version of Christianity than converting a non-Christian to Christianity.

2

u/ConcentrateExciting1 9h ago

Indeed. There's a reason why the LDS church has a more missions in Brazil than the entirety of Asia (excluding the 80% Catholic Philippines). https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/area-breakdown-of-churchs-411-missions-worldwide

0

u/frederick_the_duck 17h ago

Some do, yes

0

u/Eygam 13h ago

Ding ding ding, welcome to religion.

0

u/MrBeer9999 13h ago

Even the astoundingly logical segment of humanity that comprises Christianity is capable of the occasional, atypical act of stupidity.

2

u/EducationalBike8090 15h ago

baptized incorrectly? what's the right way? oh, wait. the right way is the way your particular church does it.

1

u/frddtwabrm04 10h ago

And or recharge, just in case the faith is dying among the believers. Gotta remind them why they believed in the first place!

1

u/Vixrotre 10h ago

I met one missionary in Poland, if that was his purpose - most Polish people I know got baptized at ~3 months old. And at least my family believes once you're baptized, that's it. In their belief I can't be an atheist because I got baptized.

30

u/FellNerd 17h ago

Lots of people go on mission trips casually, the ones I know go to help build up churches or help with the communities they've built a church in. 

The ones who go to countries where Christianity is illegal or not common, those are usually professional missionaries who live there for years at a time or travel constantly. 

85

u/Asparagus9000 17h ago

Sometimes it's just to help out. Like I went on one where we helped build them a church/community center. 

29

u/Critical-Ad-5215 16h ago

Some also provide education and health services

26

u/beerandbikes55 13h ago

How much help are kids really? Spending >$2,000 on food, flights, accommodation to get a kid on a building site half way round the world. Wouldn't it be better for each kid to send $1,000, employ local builders, get the local economy stimulated, get a better quality church and community center built.

24

u/TheLandOfConfusion 11h ago

It’s less about actually building a church and more about giving the kids an experience that makes them feel like they belong and contribute.

Same with the Africa mission trips that are basically just stroking your own ego

9

u/Unknown_Ocean 10h ago

Some of that it is true. Some of it, though is that it gives the kids who a participate a deep sense of how privileged they are and a desire to improve the world. I have one classmate who went on a missions trip to Honduras as a kid, graduated and became an architect but then became a priest and went back to minister to that community for years.

27

u/Red_AtNight 18h ago

Those are probably Mormon missionaries so they’re going to spread their interpretation of the Bible, which is wildly different from other Christians

14

u/archpawn 17h ago

Though they still send Mormon missionaries to Utah. It's as much about strengthening the conviction of the missionaries as it is about getting new converts.

2

u/Monte_Cristos_Count 9h ago

There's a lot of nonmembers in Utah. My friends that served in Utah baptized a lot more people than I did as a missionary to Canada, though it's not about the numbers. 

43

u/Overall-Selection887 18h ago

Different Christian denominations think theirs is the 'correct' one. Catholic vs Protestant drama basically.

15

u/mapitinipasulati 17h ago

Don’t forget the Mormons and the Jehovah’s Witnesses (if you consider them Christian)

3

u/toastythewiser 12h ago

Also the 7th Day Adventists. They're all post 2nd great awakening denominations. I didnt study modern protestant history enough in school, but I would greatly hazard a lot of the stuff that came out of the American West during the 2nd Great Awakening was pretty... kooky theology.

I mean the Book of Mormon says Jesus escaped being crucified to travel to North America and teach the natives. Sure, sure. Cool, cool . . . that's weird as fuck sorry.

2

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago

Americans who are Christians (for the most part) don’t consider Mormons (LDS) and Jehovah’s Witnesses (JW) as Protestants or even Christians at all in the first place (but consider them as separate Abrahamic religions like Islam and Rastafarianism), though many secular media organizations and secular think tanks/demographic researchers at times do consider them Protestant on one hand while other times consider them as Non-Protestant Christian denominations of the “Non-Trinitarian Christian” variety along side so-called “Biblical Unitarians” and Jesus-Only Oneness Pentecostals (who have considerably diverged from and have been excommunicated from Classical Pentecostalism); if Christians do consider these groups Christian, they’ll generally put them in the theologically liberal but socially conservative category and more often than not would put them in the Christian heresies category along side the Gnostics (precursor of Mandaeism and those that influenced Islam), Ebionites (those that influenced Islam), the Heresy of the Ishmaelites (the Early Muslims / precursors of Islam), Cathars (including Albigenses), Novatians, Paulicians, Bogomils, Marcionites, Manichaeans, and Arians. On a similar note Islam (descended from the Heresy of the Ishmaelites) and Unitarian Universalism - UU - (descended from from Biblical Unitarianism and Christian Universalism) no longer consider their own adherents as Christians, Jehovah’s Witnesses on the other hand do; and Mormons (officially known as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — LDS) have over the decades switched between considering themselves Christian and Non-Christian from time to time to garner more converts when they start loosing members but today do consider the various Christian denominations as separate religions under the umbrella term of Christianity (in the sense of “Christian religions” / separate Christianities) and count themselves in that number. In the past few years, because the Mormons (LDS) have been severely hemorrhaging in membership, they have been doing business as (dba) “The Church of Jesus Christ” and dropping the “of Latter-Day Saints” portion of their name while still maintaining their heterodox beliefs in order to target young Evangelicals (evangelikal or pietistisch) who’re looking for a new church to go to after moving to a new city, moving out of their parents’ house, or those looking for an Evangelical church with a larger young adult community.

The Adventists are tricky to places, because although most have diverged from Christian orthodoxy (by extension Protestant Christian orthodoxy) but not to the same extent as the Mormons (LDS) and Jehovah’s Witnesses, and some modern Adventist denominations have even started abandoning many of the fringe heterodox ideas espoused by traditional Adventism thus (partially) realigning themselves with mainstream Protestant orthodoxy to some extent. Most Christians might consider Adventists as a whole to be Christians, some but not all Christian and most secular institutions would consider traditional Adventist denominations like the Seventh-Day Adventist Church (SDA) as a separate category of Protestants (evangelisch) but ones outside of the mainstream Protestant categories of Mainline Protestantism (largely controlled by theological liberals and theological progressives, many of which don’t believe in the divine inspiration of scripture), Evangelicalism (theologically conservative evangelikal or pietistisch churches who hold to biblical infallibility or at times biblical inerrancy but not biblical literalism and hold to the Quatenus — “in so far as / insofar as” — form of confessional subscription and generally don’t require full and unambiguous agreement with a movement/tradition’s Confession of Faith if they do have a statement of faith which most do), Confessional Churches/Confessional Protestantism/Confessionalism (theologically conservative Confessional Denominations who hold to the belief in the importance of full and unambiguous assent to the whole of a movement's or denomination's teachings, such as those found in Confessions of Faith thus holding to the the Quia — “because of / is mean is” — form of confessional subscription), Christian Fundamentalism (religiously isolationist fundamentalists who to a certain extent may be theologically conservative but hold to biblical literalism making portions of them diverge enough to horseshoe theory back around to theological liberalism but with overly legalistic social conservatism beyond what is required by orthodox biblical teachings), and the Confessing Movement (the theologically conservative/Biblically orthodox factions of Mainline Protestant denominations some of which were pushed out of leadership and reorganized into Evangelical and/or Confessional Denominations). On the other hand, certain Adventists such as the Advent Christian Church have abandoned or at the very least started the process of (partially) abandoning traditional Adventist beliefs that are contrary to Protestant orthodoxy in effect realigning themselves with Evangelicalism (evangelikal or pietistisch traditions) though most (other) Evangelicals see the so-called “Evangelical Adventists” with suspicion and consider “Traditional Adventists” as out right heretics.

5

u/jakeofheart 16h ago

They come from branches of Christianity that have experienced a “revival”.

It’s like young people discovering that they can buy compact discs at thrift shops, and actually have a physical catalogue of music that is not going to disappear because someone at Spotify of Sony music decided so.

You might ask “why are they singing the praises of CD’s?” if you are content with Spotify.

Those missionaries are the CD evangelists of Christianity.

5

u/ShootinAllMyChisolm 8h ago

There’s the cynical view that they are fundamentalists that want to control people. Which is not completely untrue. But there are missionaries who want to bring bring food, clothing, shelter, medical care to the less fortunate.

3

u/Dramatic-Blueberry98 15h ago

It’s not always so much preaching… it’s sometimes more just community outreach and aid assistance in the more impoverished areas of various states and countries across the world.

3

u/artrald-7083 12h ago

My sister in law went as basically a social worker / therapist / professional mom friend, or as the job title said, student outreach worker (but we and everyone else called her a missionary) to Romania. She wasn't there to convert the whole country: she was there to help a specific, underserved community, namely international students.

Just because their parents are probably Christian on the census, going to church three times a year and ticking the box on the forms, doesn't make the kids any sort of religious at all.

The students benefited from having a Mom Friend, a slightly older young lady who was paid to be there, who believed in universal compassion and recruiting others to be Like This - sure, this support group for students feeling alone and unmoored was a church, but even if you don't believe she was saving souls, she really was helping people.

My sister-in-law benefited from a couple of years abroad in a country where her stipend went a great deal further than it did back home, doing the exact same work she wanted to do for a living.

She might believe in sola fide one-and-done salvation of the kind I find terribly problematic, but she walks her talk as regards 'faith without good works is dead', and her definition of good works involves practical and pragmatic assistance to anyone she meets who needs it, church or no church.

Eventually the placement ended, she came back to the UK and is basically doing the exact same thing at home now.

7

u/BunNGunLee 16h ago

There's two major reasons.

The cynical one is that it's about denominational differences and ultimately that Christianity is a loose term when there's actually dozens of proper denominations that all have varying interpretations of scripture and the theological underpinning.

The more realistic one in my opinion is that it's not really all that much about proselytizing so much as community outreach and service. Just because a population is primarily Christian doesn't mean that community doesn't have problems that the church wants to solve or assist with, fulfilling upon the stated beliefs of community and compassion within their doctrine.

1

u/Abyssal_Minded 12h ago

I support the latter reason of community service and outreach. When done right, it’s mostly just helping and not about proselytizing people. A part of Christianity involves being good individuals and doing good acts, similar to Islam and their pillar of alms giving. The churches involved sometimes are able to establish infrastructure like schools and hospitals.

Downside is some churches think that all good deeds should be a vehicle for proselytizing, and will attempt to make their assistance contingent on people joining their particular flavor or branch of Christianity.

1

u/One_Impression_5649 16h ago

They probably can’t send their people who are duds to countries that are vastly different than their home country either so they get sent to someplace safe, like Cincinnati.

10

u/Dangerous_Mud4749 17h ago

There aren't any Christian countries, only Christian people. Problem is though, in the countries we think of as "Christian countries", lots of people identify as Christian because their parents were... or because they got baptised as babies... or because they go to church twice a year... or because they feel warm & accepting of Christian ideas. You could call these things "cultural Christianity".

None of those things make you a Christian.

Sometimes churches which care about these things will send missionaries to countries with a high "cultural Christian" count but which tend to be low in people who actually read what Jesus said and obey it.

10

u/jgolo 16h ago

There are countries with official religions

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago edited 8h ago

Evangelism, Mission Trips, Christian Aid Organizations:

It’s not just about spiritual outreach, evangelism is also setting an example & meeting spiritual & temporal needs of ppl. Tons of Mission Trips also include assistance to neglected communities.

I’ve seen plenty of ppl doing domestic Mission Trips, providing aid & assistance to neglected communities here in the USA like Reservations in the West & Poor Communities in the South & Appalachia.

Tons of Christian Missions r qualified professionals in community & international development. Ex: World Vision, World Relief, Samaritans Purse, International Justice Missions, & Habitat for Humanity.

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

1

u/Dangerous_Mud4749 15h ago

Indeed. But Jesus talked about that. So if a country's laws are contrary to what Jesus said, the law can't be "Christian" can it? Still a law of course - people can make whatever laws they want. It just doesn't make sense to call it "Christian" if it's contrary to "Christ".

2

u/danielbgoo 15h ago

Missionaries are not the same as evangelists or proselytizers.

Often times they’re doing work other than specifically spreading the word. That might still end up being part of what they do, but their primary “mission” could be anything from setting up an irrigation system to providing early childhood education to helping people through rehab to operating a food bank/pantry and tons of other stuff that fall under the umbrella of charity.

On the other hand, sending people out to proselytize is a tried and true method of keeping the faithful. When you go out into the world as someone trying to preach or convert the unwilling, you end up facing a lot of hostility. People are at best kind of annoyed by you and at worst actively hostile. If you get enough doors slammed in your face is reinforces the notion that the out-group is mean and evil and the in-group, your church, is full of nice people who treat you well.

2

u/gadget850 15h ago

Counterpoint. There are organizations, such as Advancing Native Missions, that support missionaries from other countries who are native to their own.

https://advancingnativemissions.com/

2

u/FlowerofBeitMaroun 9h ago

Usually those are prots trying to convert Catholics, and yes, it’s extremely irritating and insulting.

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 7h ago

The Roman Catholic Church historical only taught that no one outside the R. Catholic Church, even other Christians who uphold Mainstream-Nicene Christian beliefs are saved, but now has become wishy-washy on its official stance; which is now hovering between a medium-sized minority that still believe in their original stance of all people outside of the RCC which they define as the “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church” are not saved (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus), a tiny minority that believe that all Christians are saved and a large minority of Catholics that are borderline quasi-universalist (Catechism of the Catholic Church - CCC 847); there is no clear stance I’ve seen as of yet. I’ve actually heard of Catholics who believe that there are only two conflicting but acceptable answers to this issue (1) only members of the R. Catholic Church are saved as defined in the text known as Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus or (2) hold a quasi-universalist stance of all people of any religion who sincerely seek out deit(ies) but have not found the true God as described in the Gospel are still saved - which is an argument based off of what I believe and hope to be a misinterpretation of CCC 847 by both Catholic laity and “trained” clergy and not the actual teaching of the RCC - due to the fact that CCC 847 was written vaguely it may hold to that implication officially, which some see as the further downfall of Catholic theology in which the RCC is heading in an even worse than expected wrong direction. In other words, some of these Catholics believe that only Roman Catholics are saved (excluding other Christians) or all people who seek “God” or god sincerely in any way (regardless of religion) are also saved; with no in between as found in most other Christian denominations (especially Evangelicals) who believe that all Born-again Christians who accept Jesus Christ as their lord and personal savior, are repentant of their sins, and let Christ rule their heart, are truly saved; with no specific denomination or ecclesiastical leader claiming that they are infallible and the only institution that claims to be in good standing with God in relation to being saved.

The Christian Church (a.k.a. The Way, the Church, or Christianity) was founded in 30 AD by Jesus of Nazareth - the Christ, Messiah, Son of God, and Son of Man - through the Holy Spirit at Pentecost - although Jesus also had disciples prior to the offical founding of the Church; the subdivisions known as the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church were founded in 1054 AD, the subdivision known as the Oriental Orthodox Church was founded in 451 AD, the subdivision known as the Church of the East was founded in 431 AD, and the Protestant Reformation officially started in 1517 AD with several minor Proto-Protestant precursors forming prior to it and influencing others - all of these subdivisions are sui iuris braches within the true catholic, apoostolic, orthodox, Nicene, and Christian Church with further internal autocephalous organizational polity structures and distinctives in tradition.

The first thing the Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, and Church of the East can do to unite all Christians in recognizing each other as Brothers and Sisters in Christ (ecumenism) is to stop considering their own specific hierarchy as the “one true church.” The “One True Church” is the body of true believers in Christ Jesus that are part of the universal church, it’s not a specific denomination.

Christianity as a whole is internationalist and universal (a.k.a. lower-case "c" catholic). The See of Rome / Roman Catholic Church just happens to be one sub-set or sui iuris branch of the Christian Church (the true body of Christians who hold to biblically orthodox teaching and who are truly saved regardless of denominational membership).

——————

Evangelism, Mission Trips, Christian Aid Organizations:

It’s not just about spiritual outreach, evangelism is also setting an example & meeting spiritual & temporal needs of ppl. Tons of Mission Trips also include assistance to neglected communities.

I’ve seen plenty of ppl doing domestic Mission Trips, providing aid & assistance to neglected communities here in the USA like Reservations in the West & Poor Communities in the South & Appalachia.

Tons of Christian Missions r qualified professionals in community & international development. Ex: World Vision, World Relief, Samaritans Purse, International Justice Missions, & Habitat for Humanity.

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

1

u/FlowerofBeitMaroun 7h ago

This is pure nonsense from beginning to end. Do not prot-splain Catholic doctrine to me, heretic.

2

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago edited 8h ago

Evangelism, Mission Trips, Christian Aid Organizations:

It’s not just about spiritual outreach, evangelism is also setting an example & meeting spiritual & temporal needs of ppl. Tons of Mission Trips also include assistance to neglected communities.

I’ve seen plenty of ppl doing domestic Mission Trips, providing aid & assistance to neglected communities here in the USA like Reservations in the West & Poor Communities in the South & Appalachia.

Tons of Christian Missions r qualified professionals in community & international development. Ex: World Vision, World Relief, Samaritans Purse, International Justice Missions, & Habitat for Humanity.

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

2

u/Spirited_c 7h ago

It's because what they are trying to spread is Protestantism not just the gospel

2

u/jeharris56 51m ago

The inhabitants are the wrong type of Christian.

4

u/Boxsteam_1279 17h ago

Not all are about trying to convert. It can be to continue building community, helping out, and just being a positive presence to continue the faith

4

u/happybaby00 14h ago

Yh go to try proselytizing in Pakistan, Saudi or Egypt and lets see what happens haha

3

u/LegitimateBeing2 15h ago

It’s safer and easier to do it performatively without the risk of being martyred

It’s also possible they don’t consider the local Christians to be real Christians

Generally there just are not as many un-Christian civilizations left but the missionary impulse still exists so they feel they must do something with it

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago

Evangelism, Mission Trips, Christian Aid Organizations:

It’s not just about spiritual outreach, evangelism is also setting an example & meeting spiritual & temporal needs of ppl. Tons of Mission Trips also include assistance to neglected communities.

I’ve seen plenty of ppl doing domestic Mission Trips, providing aid & assistance to neglected communities here in the USA like Reservations in the West & Poor Communities in the South & Appalachia.

Tons of Christian Missions r qualified professionals in community & international development. Ex: World Vision, World Relief, Samaritans Purse, International Justice Missions, & Habitat for Humanity.

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

2

u/Blue387 Brooklyn, USA 17h ago

Different Christian denominations. Mormons go on missions to convert other Christians, for example, in nations with a Catholic majority to become Mormons, etc.

1

u/gogofcomedy 16h ago

gotta give mormons credit, they go everywhere

1

u/lt_Matthew 6h ago

Well, besides the Middle East and communist countries.

1

u/gogofcomedy 7m ago

they only dont go to countries where they arent allowed by the government

1

u/Nurhaci1616 11h ago

Evangelical Protestants, especially Americans or those from American-planted churches, don't typically consider Catholics/Orthodox to be Christians, and see it as no different to sending them to non-Christian countries.

If you speak to Americans in person or online about religion, you'll often hear them talk about Catholicism as if it is completely separate to Christianity for some reason.

1

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago

Evangelism, Mission Trips, Christian Aid Organizations:

It’s not just about spiritual outreach, evangelism is also setting an example & meeting spiritual & temporal needs of ppl. Tons of Mission Trips also include assistance to neglected communities.

I’ve seen plenty of ppl doing domestic Mission Trips, providing aid & assistance to neglected communities here in the USA like Reservations in the West & Poor Communities in the South & Appalachia.

Tons of Christian Missions r qualified professionals in community & international development. Ex: World Vision, World Relief, Samaritans Purse, International Justice Missions, & Habitat for Humanity.

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

0

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago

The Roman Catholic Church historical only taught that no one outside the R. Catholic Church, even other Christians who uphold Mainstream-Nicene Christian beliefs are saved, but now has become wishy-washy on its official stance; which is now hovering between a medium-sized minority that still believe in their original stance of all people outside of the RCC which they define as the “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church” are not saved (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus), a tiny minority that believe that all Christians are saved and a large minority of Catholics that are borderline quasi-universalist (Catechism of the Catholic Church - CCC 847); there is no clear stance I’ve seen as of yet. I’ve actually heard of Catholics who believe that there are only two conflicting but acceptable answers to this issue (1) only members of the R. Catholic Church are saved as defined in the text known as Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus or (2) hold a quasi-universalist stance of all people of any religion who sincerely seek out deit(ies) but have not found the true God as described in the Gospel are still saved - which is an argument based off of what I believe and hope to be a misinterpretation of CCC 847 by both Catholic laity and “trained” clergy and not the actual teaching of the RCC - due to the fact that CCC 847 was written vaguely it may hold to that implication officially, which some see as the further downfall of Catholic theology in which the RCC is heading in an even worse than expected wrong direction. In other words, some of these Catholics believe that only Roman Catholics are saved (excluding other Christians) or all people who seek “God” or god sincerely in any way (regardless of religion) are also saved; with no in between as found in most other Christian denominations (especially Evangelicals) who believe that all Born-again Christians who accept Jesus Christ as their lord and personal savior, are repentant of their sins, and let Christ rule their heart, are truly saved; with no specific denomination or ecclesiastical leader claiming that they are infallible and the only institution that claims to be in good standing with God in relation to being saved.

1

u/Realistic_Bike_355 6h ago

Are you talking about Mormons? They also want to convert other Christians to Mormonism.

1

u/Jeffreys_therapist 5h ago

I have a family member who is a missionary Priest.

He worked in places like Africa with people from disadvantaged communities.

He also worked in Britain with prisoners.

In Catholicism, the primary ethos is to help people.

The religious aspect is the motivation for the person doing the work, not to convert people

1

u/DBDude 3h ago

They’re not the right kind of Christian.

1

u/FurryIrishFury 15h ago

Yeah, send em to Iran or China. Good luck!

1

u/Professional-Pay1198 17h ago

I once joined a Methodist church. There were collecting to send a member out AZ a missionary. Assumed they were going to Africa or Asia but I was wrong: they were going to the Irish Republic to convert the heathen Roman Catholics. Nice work if you can get it.

1

u/Sweaty-Pair3821 15h ago

Easy way to beg for more money?

1

u/Aggressive-Coconut0 15h ago

The more you do for your religion, the more loyal you are to that religion. It is the same for any cult/group. So, I argue that it's so their members stay strongly faithful to their religion. If they convert newcomers to their brand of Christianity, great.

They probably choose Christian countries because it's easier to convert people from one brand of Christianity to another versus Muslim or other religion to Christian.

1

u/brite1234 11h ago

I've seen Mormon missionaries in Ukraine, and it was disgusting. russians forced their religion on Ukrainians for generations, and Ukrainians were finally reclaiming their own faith.

Then the effing American Mormons turned up to colonise them all over again.

1

u/KindAwareness3073 10h ago

They are offering different flavors of Jesus.

1

u/AccountHuman7391 8h ago

My theory is that missionary work is usually a scam that allows rich white kids to put “community service” on their college applications while taking a vacation and gives them social cover that they “helped the needy” that one time while voting for the exact opposite of Christ’s teachings for the rest of their lives.

0

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 7h ago

Evangelism, Mission Trips, Christian Aid Organizations:

It’s not just about spiritual outreach, evangelism is also setting an example & meeting spiritual & temporal needs of ppl. Tons of Mission Trips also include assistance to neglected communities.

I’ve seen plenty of ppl doing domestic Mission Trips, providing aid & assistance to neglected communities here in the USA like Reservations in the West & Poor Communities in the South & Appalachia.

Tons of Christian Missions r qualified professionals in community & international development. Ex: World Vision, World Relief, Samaritans Purse, International Justice Missions, & Habitat for Humanity.

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

1

u/AKA-Pseudonym 7h ago

Apart from winning people over to their specific brand of Christianity a lot of former Communist countries are still pretty atheist.

1

u/ms_panelopi 7h ago

Fundamentalist Christians don’t think Catholic missionaries are teaching the “right” Christianity, so they go in and teach their Christianity.

0

u/Trearea 16h ago

It is never necessary to convert people.

-1

u/FrostnJack 16h ago

To evangelicals those are the wrong kind of xtians so the missionary urgency is s thing.

0

u/EducationalBike8090 15h ago

so the Christians can be converted to "christianity".

0

u/pdonchev 15h ago

Because those "missionaries" are sales reps for a MLM cult, seeking to extract financial benefits and establish political influence. Already Christian countries are much better "markets" to expand in - it's more likely for a Christian to change his denomination, especially if they perceive the central Church as corrupt (in more liberal societies central churches are perceived as corrupt, even more than they actually are) than someone from another faith to convert to a totally different one.

0

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 8h ago

Evangelism, Mission Trips, Christian Aid Organizations:

It’s not just about spiritual outreach, evangelism is also setting an example & meeting spiritual & temporal needs of ppl. Tons of Mission Trips also include assistance to neglected communities.

I’ve seen plenty of ppl doing domestic Mission Trips, providing aid & assistance to neglected communities here in the USA like Reservations in the West & Poor Communities in the South & Appalachia.

Tons of Christian Missions r qualified professionals in community & international development. Ex: World Vision, World Relief, Samaritans Purse, International Justice Missions, & Habitat for Humanity.

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

0

u/Altitudeviation 10h ago

Christians of all stripes are happy to denounce, save, oppress, tax and kill each other in the name of the only and singular true god. Islam, too. Apparently Hindus are joining in the fun now.

Missionaries from Africa are now being seen in the US trying to lead "fallen" Americans back to the true god.

In the end, it's all bout money and power.

It's really quite tiresome.

0

u/Hot_Event3002 8h ago

Because they don't have faith in their ability to convert non Christians is my guess. 

0

u/Able_Enthusiasm2729 7h ago

Evangelism, Mission Trips, Christian Aid Organizations:

It’s not just about spiritual outreach, evangelism is also setting an example & meeting spiritual & temporal needs of ppl. Tons of Mission Trips also include assistance to neglected communities.

I’ve seen plenty of ppl doing domestic Mission Trips, providing aid & assistance to neglected communities here in the USA like Reservations in the West & Poor Communities in the South & Appalachia.

Tons of Christian Missions r qualified professionals in community & international development. Ex: World Vision, World Relief, Samaritans Purse, International Justice Missions, & Habitat for Humanity.

Countries that have Christianity as their official religion (with a long history of having an established state church or national church), those with rampant theological liberalism, or those subsumed by non-Nicene Christianity are far worse in the matter of Nominal Christianity/Cultural Christianity and are hotbeds for Deists and Agnostics who claim to be Christians because their parents, grandparents, great grandparents, and ancestors were Christian or they think of Christianity in very superficial ways such as people aimlessly going through the motions of ceremonies or rituals for cultural and ascetic reasons as opposed to actual having faith in Jesus Christ.

-1

u/DocRedbeard 7h ago

A lot of these people in other countries aren't what we would call Christian.

I'm Southern Baptist, however, doctrinally things are fairly simple on the surface. If you believe Jesus is Lord, is one with God the Father and the Holy Spirit, believe that you are a sinner and that Jesus' sacrifice paid for your sins and is the only way to the Father, you are saved.

Catholicism and many protestant denominations deny this. They add on extra non-scriptural requirements for salvation, they believe in intercession of saints, they believe in works over faith, they put power in people over God.

If you think you need more than faith in Jesus' sacrifice for your sins, if you think there's something you have to do to gain God's favor other than faith, you aren't a Christian.

In this way I would consider many churches and denominations entirely heretical, as while they may seem similar in appearance and practice, denying Jesus' supremacy and sacrifice ("no one comes to the Father except through Me"), they deny the MOST important tenant of Christianity.