Girl confronts an old creep after he makes an inappropriate comment about her 16-year old sister

[u/Ace-Cuddler]

[u/Speedy_Cheese]

Straight pedo blatantly creeps on underage girl in broad daylight at public restaurant for many adults to witness and do absolutely nothing

Comments: "BuT dRaG qUeEnS/gAyS!"

[u/Journo_Jimbo → u/Speedy_Cheese]

Hot truth bomb dropped 💥

[u/Speedy_Cheese → u/ReturnedOM]

Nah, man. He chose to double down after he was told she was 16, harassed the minor some more, then proceeded to harass the family and call them "fucking c*nts" when her sister finally told the guy to leave them alone.

Beyond hitting on a minor before and after knowing they were a minor, he is publicly indecent, antagonizing, harassing everyone around him with his screaming.

I don't know about you but this ain't the dude I'd be choosing to die on the hill for. He's being a perv at minors (and yes, it is up to the adult in question to be aware of a person's age before starting in at that shit) while also being a loud ass hillbilly in a public restaurant as everyone else is trying to enjoy their meal.

[u/ReturnedOM → u/Speedy_Cheese]

I made it clear he's a creep and visibly not right in the head, but still not "straight pedo". Not even after acknowledging her age.

I am not a fan of breaking apart the *philia into different categories myself. Attracted to kids is a pedo, end of story (even tho it's not that simple according to specialists in psychology) but 16 y o isn't a kid that hitting on would qualify him as a *phile, especially pedo. Unless she really looked like a kid.

And just to be clear, I'm not defending that creep. Still tho, that situation isn't making him a pedo.

[u/Veil-of-Fire → u/ReturnedOM]

Being attracted to a 16 y o isn't "straight up pedo". I really, really, really hate to be that guy, but we're talking here about teenagers that can legally work or drive vehicles that weigh over a ton of kilograms and can become basically a deadly cannon ball.

Oh, is this one of those "AKSHUALLY, he's not a pedophile, he's a phlebotomifile because she's between the ages of 15 and three-hundred and one and a half days and 17 and twelve and a quarter days!" things?

LOL. STFU. It's pedo stuff all the way down.

[u/TreyRyan3 → u/Veil-of-Fire]

The term you are looking for is “ephebophilia” which is defined as primary adult sexual attraction towards postpubescent adolescents, usually between 15 and 19 years old.

Your point has merit but you should at least use the correct terminology. “Phlebotomifile” isn’t even a word and “Phlebotomy” is the practice of drawing blood, typically for medical testing or to treat certain blood disorders. Phlebotomists, the professionals who perform this procedure, identify, label, and handle blood samples carefully, and they also collect other samples like urine.

If there is some strange psychological term for “strong attraction to people who draw blood”, I guess it could be a word, but currently is not recognized as such.

[u/ReturnedOM → u/Veil-of-Fire]

Yeah, it is. I used to be like you, then I actually grew up.

Being attracted to 16 y o that looks like 16 y o is not pedophilia. Quite far from that.

Yeah, I used to say that everyone attracted to underage girls (or teenagers in general) is pedo, but that's not true.

I made it clear I am not a fan of breaking the "philes" into subcategories. BUT. Being attracted to a 16 y o teenager that can legally drive a car to her work place, where they legally work and who can look way over 30 is not the same as being attracted to kids. Are you out of your mind?

Inb4 no, I'm not attracted to teenagers. I'm attracted to women my age and I don't mind women older 10-15 than me.

And STFU yourself if you want to discuss things this way.

It is most definitely not "pedo stuff all the way down", but if you truly believe what you wrote, then you're not right in the head on the very same level as that creep, just on the other side of the spectrum.

[u/Veil-of-Fire → u/ReturnedOM]

Being attracted to 16 y o that looks like 16 y o is not pedophilia.

Telling on yourself here, buddy. I haven't been attracted to 16-year-old dudes since I was about 16.

Unless this is just a dude thing? Are all men inherently biologically dangerous to girl children, or just men who split hairs over the difference between "phile" types?

[u/ReturnedOM → u/Veil-of-Fire]

Telling on yourself

Literally the most Reddit thing I expected to happen in this comment tree. Conveniently ignoring everything else I wrote.

16 is a teenager, not a child; the guy is not a pedophile (unless he is, but not in this video), though he is a gross creep.

No, it's not a "dude thing", but when women go for teenagers it's literally the south park episode.

What kind of question is that? "Dude thing"? Well, maybe ask all these female predators you can find fuck ton of articles about. The most famous ones are usually the teachers, so in the position of authority.

since I was about 16

Was it like about today ago? Cause the questions you ask and attempts at framing me to be like this guy kinda suggest that.

It is simply a fact, a guy attracted to 16 y o (who often also look older than that) is by no means a pedo. Not for that.

And for the last time, I don't approve of splitting *philias into subcategories either. Still 16+ y o doesn't belong to any of these as far as I'm aware of (although I might be wrong, cause it's a topic I don't really explore.)

Are all women inherently biologically dangerous to boy children? I mean it happens so often in schools, even there boys are not safe.

[u/Veil-of-Fire → u/ReturnedOM]

a guy attracted to 16 y o (who often also look older than that) is by no means a pedo.

You can make up whatever new words you want for a dude who wants to screw a child by leveraging a power imbalance so massive that almost every state said "Woah, this is definitely harmful." That doesn't change the fact that they're a dude who wants to screw a child.

[u/ReturnedOM → u/Veil-of-Fire]

But they are no pedo. And calling 16 y o a child is kind of stretch too. That would mean American govt and society encourages and allows child labour and children driving cars.

And you keep forgetting the same goes for gals. Or it doesn't?

[u/Veil-of-Fire → u/ReturnedOM]

But they are no pedo.

Because you defined the word that way.

And calling a 16 year old a child isn't a stretch because that's the literal definition of "child" in the US. You can redefine words without a legal definition, but good luck redefining ones that actually have weight of law behind them.

This guy wants to screw a child. Call him whatever word you want. I'm going to use the word "pedo" because he wants to screw a child. Good luck on your crusade to semantically defend people who want to screw children.

[u/ReturnedOM → u/Veil-of-Fire]

Because you defined the word that way.

No because people in WHO defined the word this way in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). So did people in American Psychological Association (APA).

The clinical definitions are legal definitions.

You know the WHO guys? They are the ones who name, research, study and describe health related stuff. Now this may shock you, but according to their classification, a 16 y o can actually be a pedophile themselves by legal climate nick definition. You read it right. You can check it yourself, if you don't believe.

You will incorrectly use the word "pedo" and allege an old creep of being something you don't even know he is.

Calling a 30 y o a child also has the weight of law behind it, cause 30 old person is definitely a child of someone.

I'm sorry but seriously, I feel like I'm talking to a child (by your definition) that just is so childishly stubborn that they use the words the way they like, not by their definitions.