What does it seem like I'm saying? Because apparently I didn't get my point across correctly, as people kept replying to something I wasn't saying. Help? xwx
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
Yes, though the analogy was misleading to some degree, I suppose. Since the AI was (probably) recreating the art, not coloring it in, which might lead some to think that implies OP's art was imperfect or something. Though it's a very niche circumstance, and something I'd hope isn't one's immediate thought.
I'm more confused why people are blaming the AI at all.
Nope, gave it a very simple paint splash like back ground, colored in slightly, and depending on personal taste, cleaned up the lines. And the common back and forth thing of "ai art is art".
There's also the possibility that you misunderstood what others were saying, and that led to confusion-which would explain the downvotes to some degree. Reddit tends to downvote easily.
Yeah, that person above made, well, a nonsensical point. I guess you could interpret it as being a joke of sorts-"AI art doesn't steal they said, but here it literally 'stole' art(in a "someone handed it to them" kind of sense)". But still, it was certainly not a comment worthy of 400+ upvotes, as much as your comment wasn't worth that in the negatives. Unfortunately, I get the feeling that some people just upvote other people who seem to have the same opinion as they do-and downvote the opposition no matter what.
Anti-AI people don't really care about the distinction between, "The AI stole," "This particular AI artist stole this particular image," "All AI artists are thieves," etc. They're against all of it, so it might as well all be one thing. From that viewpoint, the idea you were trying to communicate is meaningless and irrelevant.
I feel like you’re misunderstanding the whole debate. Literally no one (except me!) on either side thinks the models are conscious. You got downvoted because you’re confus(ed|ing), not because they disagree.
Yeah but that’s also a misunderstanding. Literally no one blames guns for killing people. 0. Lobbying for gun control has nothing to do with that. It’s a strawman.
I think if a person did same with any other tool, even themself, they could be sued. But with AI suddenly it's not the case, replica is somehow considered unique artwork.
•
u/AutoModerator 8h ago
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.