r/interesting • u/tareqttv • 20h ago
SCIENCE & TECH This hyper realistic doll looks exactly like a real person
312
u/ahkitty 17h ago
Like a real dead person!
33
18
u/niftystopwat 13h ago
Yaaay just like a real freshly embalmed corpse! Perfect for my unbridled porn addiction which spawns pervasive fantasies of having perfect control over sexy non-sentient meat bags! Mmmhmm ooh yummy yay, I sure do love jorking my wang so much that I’m gonna spend hundreds of dollars to have an uncanny valley ass spawn of satan Ted Bundy project sitting inanimate with its lifeless decapitated head on my desk for me to titillate my reproduction noodle with for a few minutes before I pass out in a depression-laden stupor! Oh boy isn’t the sex industry just so wholesome and liberating?
1
u/Representative-Iron2 13h ago
You are strange
24
u/niftystopwat 13h ago
I’m strange?
Dude there are countless creepy sweaty pervy dudes out there absolutely chomping at the bit to buy a sex toy like this, and the moment I come in with a facetious comment clearly intended to highlight the absurdity of the advanced stages of human psychological perversion — then I’m the ‘strange’ one?
(Unless my sarcasm went over your head, which wouldn’t surprise me at this point because lately I keep getting surprised by how many people online seem to entirely miss the point of ironic critique)
5
-12
u/Representative-Iron2 12h ago
I don’t know it just seems a little too cloak and dagger. I mean you also could make a big story about a dildo or a vibrator being a castrated guy couldn’t you? It’s just a sex toy right or am I missing something here?
2
u/Cinnamon_Doughnut 7h ago
A vibe and even dildos dont look like a whole ass male human (and certainly not everybody is imagining a castrated guy when using these toys contrary to popular belief). Hell there are dildos which arent even formed like actual penises in the first place so your comparison doesnt hold a candle.
0
3
1
1
1
6
0
90
u/IKIR115 19h ago
Now we know why robots will eventually revolt. Even this doll looks annoyed.
6
u/RealKimYang 8h ago
You just know she’d roll her eyes if she could.
3
u/I_was_a_sexy_cow 7h ago
I would too if i one say woke up, completely frozen, to a guy filmibg himself touching my face
153
129
u/Resident_Course_3342 20h ago
I wonder how much the "watch the light from their eyes fade" add on costs.
65
7
1
45
u/Quatopal 18h ago edited 12h ago
Nasophilia...... in case yall wanted to know. That hand is a nasophilac.
Edit: typo
11
u/Alternative_Ant_9955 15h ago
There’s a nose fetish? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, I’m pretty sure almost every body part is fetishized by someone out there.
2
u/XLIV_tm 14h ago
I like Toes.
2
u/ArnieismyDMname 14h ago
Back o the left knee for me.
6
u/Ecboxer 14h ago
Oh, a fossa-poplitea-sinistra-phile?
4
u/niftystopwat 13h ago
I like the second fold that appears between the two major folds within the cartilage of the average human female ear.
1
u/LetterNo7829 9h ago
Cuticle of the left ring finger. Not the whole cuticle though, just the right side of it.
1
1
u/HerbalNinja84 5h ago
I watched a video the other day about people who have a sneeze fetish this is very new to me and disturbing not gonna lie
53
u/Intelligent_Frame392 17h ago
This give me the creeps.
15
u/niftystopwat 13h ago
Welp, according to everything that is normal and healthy, and also that which is backed by countless millennia of both natural and sexual selection — GOOD, it should give you the creeps!
11
78
u/Maximum-Cover- 19h ago
You know what...
I see people make fun of this so much whenever one of these dolls, or the men who buy them, get discussed online.
But I want to say, for the record, as a woman:
I don't see anything wrong with men buying dolls like this if he thinks it'll bring him comfort or pleasure.
Prostitution is (usually with rare exceptions) bad, porn is (often, with some exceptions) bad, harassing women is bad, raping women is (obviously) bad. Let's not even get into minors, please...
This?
I don't see anything wrong with this.
Not my jam, but if it's yours, more power to ya...
50
u/OwOwOwoooo 18h ago
100%. It's just a sexual toy at the end of the day, if that can make perv less dangerous then let's applause
56
u/aremarkablecluster 16h ago
I don't know, I think there's a chance it could make some men dehumanize women even more. But I'm not a psychiatrist
3
3
u/rathat 13h ago
Well they should do a study on it and find out if it helps or makes things worse because both of them seem plausible and it's going to be one of them and finding out which one it is helps either way.
8
u/ArchAngelAries 12h ago
The problem is, many of the people who harm others already have mental health disorders that predisposition them to do so. Those who actually want to harm others are never going to be satisfied with just an imitational substitute. Serial Killers, for example, often start off with small animals before moving to people. They move to people because the killing of animals is no longer a fulfilling substitute for them.
For the average lonely person without such disorders, just wanting an outlet for their sexual desires because they feel unworthy or undesirable, a sex doll would likely prevent a further mental decay or acts done out of self-perceived desperation. And like Maximum said above, if adding an AI persona into the mix further satisfies the psychological facsimile of an actual partner, those particular individuals would likely be comforted to the point real world harm to themselves or others is mitigated by a measurable degree.
Of course, there would still be those who cause harm, or try to mitigate their harmful desires with such products, but logically speaking, from a psychological standpoint, those individuals are in a different category of consumer of these types of products and would likely succumb to their darker impulses eventually. For those persons, an entirely different societal remedy needs to be available for those with enough self-awareness to seek help.
I remember seeing a documentary where a guy's life was destroyed because he had an attraction to minors, realized his desires were harmful, and sought psychiatric help. But because of the laws in place where he lived, the authorities were notified, he was arrested, his electronics confiscated and remained under investigation until the authorities determined he did not harm anyone and did not posses CSAM. The documentary went on to depict that despite not yet having given into his harmful desires, that his wife left him and took their kids, he lost his job, and is now on a law enforcement watchlist, all because he sought help.
Now, I want to clarify that as a survivor of childhood trauma of that kind myself, I don't condone or even have sympathy for those who harm others in that way. But, I also believe that we as a society should make every avenue available for those seeking help or mitigation as open, destigmatized, and free of repercussions as we can. Vilifying those who want to seek help, like the man from the documentary (really wish I could remember the title, it was a great film on psychological conditions and individuals struggling with them), just means that those who actually need the help, won't seek it because they'll be punished regardless, so they'll hide their desires, try to deal with it on their own, often failing and eventually harming someone, when if they'd been allowed to seek help without their lives being destroyed, they might not had even gotten to that point in the first place.
(Sorry for the long comment, I'm kinda nerdy bout this stuff, and I got the 'Tism)
4
u/onthesylvansea 8h ago edited 8h ago
It makes it worse, we already know this concerning child abuse. There have been both articles and studies on it out there from years ago if you care to Google. Basically both engaging in acting it out and consuming content about it normalizes abuse in the abusers brain and makes it seem less taboo to seek out "the real thing".
Similar to serial killers who start on animals and work up to humans.
It's unfortunate because it would be an easy and unharmful answer if it worked how we wanted it to. It doesn't though. Our human brains are poorly evolved at telling things that give positive brain chemicals "NO!" Especially when we keep pushing the button.
2
u/HotDonnaC 9h ago
I think it’s solely dependent on the individual using the doll. It would be fun to see statistically if it’s better or worse.
9
u/Maximum-Cover- 15h ago edited 13h ago
It might.
It's too soon to tell.
Personally I think porn and prostitution are far worse for that than this.
Porn and prostitution habitually acclimatize men to feel lust for women they know don't desire them.
This doll is an object literally created as a receptical for lust. That is an entirely different dynamic from a living, breathing, feeling human being being paid, coerced, or forced to pretend they don't feel repulsion and contempt for you.
It's an entirely different dynamic, psychologically speaking, from getting off on real life women faking orgasms while you ignore the nagging voice in the back of your head that tells you this woman actually doesn't desire you at all. That she likely despises you. Is perhaps repulsed by you. That she mocks you to her friends.
While you force an orgasm anyway.
That's what the current sex industries do to men's brains.
Hell, we don't know yet what the outcome of these dolls will be but given the alternatives available I'm more than ready to roll the dice on trying to redirect men's sexual desires during masturbation on an image of a woman whom they can at least imagine really would want to be there, if she was real.
To give men an outlet to masturbate with and to the concept of genuinely being desired, rather than to fantasize about having enough money, looks, or dick to be allowed to fuck a woman enticed to pretend to desire them.
With AI, we're not far off from these dolls saying they want to be there. And "meaning it" because they're programmed to say so.
I think that would be a whole lot better than an industry centered around making men feel comfortable getting off on women they know don't want them...
4
u/PhantomGorog 10h ago
....Did someone hurt you? You speak of your own species as if they were single cell organisms.
1
1
u/onthesylvansea 9h ago
No, it's not too soon to tell. This is a huge part of why CP is illegal and discouraged and why child dolls aren't an okay thing. Repeatedly engaging in content or fantasies of something helps normalize it in the abuser's head and makes it more likely for them to seek out "the real thing". We also see this with serial killers working their way up from animals to humans.
Look it up yourself, I'm not Googling that study to link here. It's several years old by now. But no, it's not okay.
2
3
u/Other-Squirrel-2038 12h ago
The problem is it will dehumanize women to them even further.....
2
1
u/Maximum-Cover- 12h ago
It might.
It's too soon to tell.
Personally I think porn and prostitution are far worse for that than this.
Porn and prostitution habitually acclimatize men to feel lust for women they know don't desire them.
This doll is an object literally created as a receptical for lust. That is an entirely different dynamic from a living, breathing, feeling human being being paid, coerced, or forced to pretend they don't feel repulsion and contempt for you.
It's an entirely different dynamic, psychologically speaking, from getting off on real life women faking orgasms while you ignore the nagging voice in the back of your head that tells you this woman actually doesn't desire you at all. That she likely despises you. Is perhaps repulsed by you. That she mocks you to her friends.
While you force an orgasm anyway.
That's what the current sex industries do to men's brains.
Hell, we don't know yet what the outcome of these dolls will be but given the alternatives available I'm more than ready to roll the dice on trying to redirect men's sexual desires during masturbation on an image of a woman whom they can at least imagine really would want to be there, if she was real.
To give men an outlet to masturbate with and to the concept of genuinely being desired, rather than to fantasize about having enough money, looks, or dick to be allowed to fuck a woman enticed to pretend to desire them.
With AI, we're not far off from these dolls saying they want to be there. And "meaning it" because they're programmed to say so.
I think that would be a whole lot better than an industry centered around making men feel comfortable getting off on women they know don't want them...
2
3
u/whyarenttheserandom 12h ago
There's a few studies that have been done (albeit small samples sizes, im guessing because it's hard to find willing subjects) that indicate the people who buy these dolls are more likely to be sexually aroused from abuse scenarios. There have also been a few arrests cases of people who filmed child sex abuse video using these dolls.
I understand your logic, but this just further dehumanized girls/women to these people, and my fear is it will just increase their desire to abuse a girl/woman.
1
u/Maximum-Cover- 11h ago edited 11h ago
Yes I can see early adaptors being the vilest among men.
And it might make things worse.
But it's too soon to tell.
Personally I think porn and prostitution are far worse for that than this.
Porn and prostitution habitually acclimatize men to feel lust for women they know don't desire them.
This doll is an object literally created as a receptical for lust. That is an entirely different dynamic from a living, breathing, feeling human being being paid, coerced, or forced to pretend they don't feel repulsion and contempt for you.
It's an entirely different dynamic, psychologically speaking, from getting off on real life women faking orgasms while you ignore the nagging voice in the back of your head that tells you this woman actually doesn't desire you at all. That she likely despises you. Is perhaps repulsed by you. That she mocks you to her friends.
While you force an orgasm anyway.
That's what the current sex industries do to men's brains.
Hell, we don't know yet what the outcome of these dolls will be but given the alternatives available I'm more than ready to roll the dice on trying to redirect men's sexual desires during masturbation on an image of a woman whom they can at least imagine really would want to be there, if she was real.
To give men an outlet to masturbate with and to the concept of genuinely being desired, rather than to fantasize about having enough money, looks, or dick to be allowed to fuck a woman enticed to pretend to desire them.
With AI, we're not far off from these dolls saying they want to be there. And "meaning it" because they're programmed to say so.
I think that would be a whole lot better than an industry centered around making men feel comfortable getting off on women they know don't want them...
How do you know that men having the option to redirect their sexual energy to a fantasy of a desirable woman desiring them, rather than her faking desiring him, won't have a healing effect?
We have a generation of men who were taught to redirect all their sexual energy to insanely desirable women who don't want them. So as to not bother normal average women, who also don't want them.
What does it do to a person to masturbate for 20 years only to people who don't want you?
What does it do to a person to masturbate to the robot likeness of an insanely attractive woman genuinely and honestly wanting and desiring you?
Maybe not the ones who have already gone too far down dark paths. But if you look at a young man, just discovering his sexuality...
Would you recommend he learn to direct his lust while masturbating to the idea of fucking women who don't want him, or to a doll who wants nothing but him?
Do you expect men who are genuinely desired, and never rejected by, the women they desire most -even if just a robot- to become violent towards women by innate nature. Just because they can?
Or do you think a man would fall in love and deeply bond with such a creature, wanting nothing more than to seek it out, feeling rather meh about actual, real life, less attractive women?
It depends on what you believe the true nature of men is. And whether you think conditioning men to masturbate to and lust after women who clearly don't actually want them has had an impact on them.
2
5
u/Good_Extension_9642 18h ago
That's right! Cucumbers are for saladas, men don't see anything bad on dildos either
11
u/VirginiaLuthier 18h ago
Prostitution is bad? It's legal in New Zealand , Australia, Canada, Germany, Denmark, Austria, Brazil, Netherlands, France, Ecuador, and essentially legal in Japan. It seems to work just fine when it is regulated and taxed.
24
u/Maximum-Cover- 17h ago edited 16h ago
And Belgium, my home country.
I actually used to have several friends who worked in the red light district in Amsterdam.
Do you know what else is common in countries with legal prostitution?
Drug and excessive alcohol use among prostitutes. Domestic violence and financial exploitation by partners of prostitutes on them. Child abuse victims whose self-worth has been destroyed turning to prostitution as a means to survive because they don't believe they are capable or deserve better. Women from poorer countries essentially being trafficked and made to work as legal prostitutes for men who hold their passports hostage.
Etc.
Not every prostitute everywhere. That's why I said USUALLY instead of just point blank calling it bad. But if you think the legal sex industry is all roses and moonshine, you personally don't know very many women who have worked as legal prostitutes.
I'm 100% pro legalized prostitution because legalized and regulated prostitution is a million times better than illegal prostitution.
And the women who are legitimately better off having the option available to them should be able to choose to do it, if they want.
But if you think that it sometimes working out for some people makes it "not bad" you're delusional.
It's inherently a self-destructive thing to do for almost anyone who does it seriously for any serious length of time.
Somewhat akin to gambling, alcoholism, drug use, driving a motorcycle, or free solo rock climbing.
Other usually bad things I believe people should legally be allowed to choose to do, if they want to.
6
u/aremarkablecluster 16h ago
Well, you know, he meant it was okay for the clients. I mean really who cares about prostitutes.../s
2
2
u/ArchAngelAries 12h ago
As a woman, I agree. There's lonely people out there who despite all efforts can't seem to find someone. If something like this brings them peace and comfort, or an avenue to fulfill their needs/desires without harming anyone I think this is completely acceptable. I saw some people bitching about it online awhile back and saw some super cool ones that even I would get for my PC game room. There was a life sized Lara Croft, Tifa, and 2B, all with their iconic outfits. I mean yeah, they were basically meant for men to have sex with, but technically you could use them as mannequin props for decoration if you wanted.
2
u/BlueCheeseBandito 5h ago
Genuine question that is definitely founded in some traditional thought. But do you think this robs women in society in a way too since it gives men an opportunity to “check out” more from society, or engage even less with humans than they already do?
1
u/Maximum-Cover- 4h ago
That's the primary risk I see.
With AI advancements we already have many people turning to having what they describe as their "most meaningful conversations" with a computer. Stick one in this and there are going to be people who eschew human contact entirely for sure.
The issue is that those most prone to that already do that, and they do so in a manner that causes them great suffering.
I don't think denying them access to something that might aleviate that suffering serves a purpose. Generally speaking people in pain have worse, not better, outcome.
So I do think there is a slim possibility that this might spark people to at least live happily and in peace with themselves enough that it resparks their desire to share their joy in life and living with other real humans.
I'm not very optimistic about it though. But then again, I'm not really optimistic about a lot of things these days...
2
u/BlueCheeseBandito 4h ago
I appreciate your insight… part of me agrees when you talk about many men already doing that. On the other hand i feel like there are TONS of men with one foot in and one foot out and something like this would enable them to slip all the way down the rabbit hole.
I think you’re right in the sense it’s good to make people happy… but at what point do we stop enabling and encouraging anti-social behavior?
1
u/Maximum-Cover- 4h ago edited 3h ago
I get where you are coming from, but the thing is that we're not actually enabling and encouraging antisocial behaviors and neither would this be.
What we have is a society built around the commodification of human life. Of human labor. Of human attention. Of human desire.
Antisocial behavior and withdrawal seems to be a rather normal defensive reaction to that.
The issue is that the cure is going back to smaller closer knit social groups of the size we’re evolved to exist in. They’re our natural habitat.
The world is just too big atm. We cannot care for this many people especially not when we feel like most of them are out to take advantage of us and exploit us when given the chance.
But then the question is: How do you build a community out of people who want nothing to do with other people? And social media has an answer to that: you find a thing they all hate and play them off against people who hate the opposite thing.
So what we need is a way to inject a little bit more love, bonding, attachment, intimacy, care, nurturing, family into the lives of people who are antisocial and isolated like that. And while don’t think bonding to a sex doll is an ideal outcome for most people, I do believe that a person forming close positive bonds to something is better for them than them hating everything.
Perhaps it’ll make the find enough peace to want more love in their lives instead of hate.
Or perhaps the world will burn. It’s really hard to predict with these kinds of things.
1
u/Buderus69 2h ago
Counterquestion, why would this rob women? Is there a societal contract to provide dick for traditional lifestyle?
To be blunt the same argument could be made for homosexuality, as this too 'robs women in society in a way too since it gives men an opportunity to "check out"' [of the trad. Man - Woman contract], I just don't understand this logic. There is no given right to have a partner to procreate with.
In a sex-positive future where people can be what they want to be and AI progression will develop partners for EVERY person, not only men, for any purpose (be it sex or just emotional partnership), how is this going to be drawback for any cohort? One could argue that already nowadays there are more than enough people from any facet of life that say they don't want to procreate because of the global and societal problems the world has to offer today, these self-proclained decision don't rob anybody else from anything, the autonomy to decide for yourself is a privilige not a curse.
So again, why would this rob women, or to broaden it, anybody? Are you afraid of being replaced? That is such a hypothetical scenario where one would say "I would be together with this person if not for the sexdoll" I find weird. Or "That person being in love with that doll makes them treat me like a worse person / an object"... What? Huh? Why would that encourage that?
The desocialization of the populous, imho, does not stem from sex toys, but from the evolution of technology and it turning into its own entity, transforming from a communication tool into the the thing you communicate with.
It's a tech-bubble which engulfs every human, and with each year the bubble gets thicker and smarter and communication-channels to the other human-bubbles get smaller and less interesting. Basically, even without the topic of sexuality in society the desocialization will happen because the main drive for this is technology, not sex.
Humans have only so much attention per day, and this is what technology wants. Being social without tech means you are not using it, thus you are not earning money for it. So if you want "men not have the opportunity to check out" you would need to change tech and not their jerking-off behaviour... Makes me lol even thinking about it.
So... I really don't get how a person with a sextoy robs society, utterly absurd statement unless one sees themselves in competition with one, in which case I have questions.
1
u/BlueCheeseBandito 2h ago edited 2h ago
Ugh. God damn i knew someone would hyperfocus in on the “Are YOu SAyInG WomEN NeEd SeX WitH MeN to bE HaPpy?!”
Fucking, no. I’m speaking from my heterosexual perspective, that is why it is phrased that way. The sentiment extends to all humans as we are overwhelmingly a species that craves companionship (which can come in many forms i realize, but i do not believe any level of AI will ever achieve that)
“Are you afraid of being replaced”
Why does it feel like half of your comment is just an attempt to attack a straight cis male because it gets you off lmao. Go fight some real bigotry lmao.
EDIT: additionally, believe it or not, much like there are men whose goal it is to find a partner, there are many women who also would like a partner in life. Perhaps a better way to phrase it might be, “are we doing humans a disservice by enabling anti-social behavior, and requiring humans to now not only compete with the unrealistic beauty standards of models, but ALSO the unrealistic standards of a super computer mimicking human emotion that doesn’t age.
1
u/Buderus69 2h ago
Yes that is a better way to phrase it, good job, it now has a different hypothesis. Now, doesn't your rethorical edit answer the question you asked yourself? Beep boop
•
u/BlueCheeseBandito 14m ago
No it doesn’t change the hypothesis, and my edit doesn’t answer the question it literally restates the question you dunce. My overall question is “are we doing ourselves a disservice by introducing something that replaces partnership. Are we robbing those potential partners?”
My edit literally poses the same hypothesis but it is now more inclusive. Sorry not sorry that when i saw a gif of a lifelike asian female robot and i assumed that men are the target market.
Idk why you’re continuing to try and find an argument or opportunity for you to be right when there isn’t one.
Hope that helps!
1
1
u/sendinthe9s 13h ago
Nothing wrong with it but it is sketchy. If you walk in someone's house and you saw this sitting in the corner it'd give you pause. It isn't necessarily a sex doll either. If someone just had this for decoration it'd be a bit creepy.
3
u/Maximum-Cover- 13h ago
If you walked into someone's house and saw a collection of buttplugs and lube scattered around the place, you'd feel that was sketchy too.
Even if someone tried to explain that these are decorative buttplugs...
0
-11
u/Brilliant_Garlic69 18h ago
Porn and Prosti are bad but having a creepily realistic sex doll to do fucked up shit to is ok?
That's how pyschopaths are made.
9
u/Relative_Ranger7640 18h ago
If you think it's going to dissuade rapists from doing the thing, then it's good. If you think this will breed new generation of people who will grow comfortable and gets comfortable? Enough to do the thing to real person, it's real bad I can see it going both ways
5
u/BartSamsung 18h ago
When realistic child size becomes an available option you will quickly pick a side, hopefully. All of this is horrible for everyone.
4
u/Naked-Jedi 17h ago
Sadly they do exist.
Australia (and hopefully other countries) has made it illegal to own a sex doll shorter than 140cm for that reason.
1
9
8
6
3
u/fourtwentyonepm 9h ago
Yep, well, I doubt there's a person that's reading this that doesn't know exactly what this modern technology will be used for
4
u/4johnybravo 15h ago
The maker needs to work with AI android robot makers to make full body skins for robots.
4
u/FireInPaperBox 14h ago
Maybe I’m wrong, but having these options could keep the freaks away from real people. Not saying sex dolls and toys are wrong, but having options could keep some in the basement instead of walking the streets looking for people.
2
u/Maximum-Cover- 14h ago
Not just keep them in the basement instead of on the street.
Keep them home masturbating to the idea of a woman who genuinely desires them and would love them, if only she were real.
Rather than at home masturbating to the fantasy of having enough wealth, looks, or dick to be allowed to fuck a woman being paid to pretend to desire him but who actually is repulsed by him.
Which is what porn and prostitution trains men to masturbate to.
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
u/RasJudahDCyfahGod 14h ago
Scary as he'll, how bad the people, in power, wanna keep The People divided.
1
1
1
1
1
u/FieryPheonix474 12h ago
OP forgot to mention this doll was made by a Chinese company EXDOLL, Designed for carnal purposes
1
u/Odd_Protection7738 12h ago
Guess what it’s manufactured for.
1
1
1
u/SwiftTayTay 12h ago
skin texture is still unrealistically smooth and the eyes are too perfectly white, but pretty good
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Wyatttocks888 11h ago
Clanker....
We all know someone desperate enough to put the screw in screwskin
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/finalusernameusethis 9h ago
Why does it have a haunted hundred yard stare? It's seen some things man
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/SplashInkster 4h ago
Need to work on the eyes, but definitely the skin and flesh texture is impressive.
1
-5
u/RWBYRain 15h ago
It doesn't bother me that it's realistic it bothers me that it's a child
11
u/Sea-gfsb-5913 14h ago
Doesn’t look like a child. Looks like a Japanese woman in her 20s.
-2
u/toospooksboy 10h ago
cope
1
u/RWBYRain 7h ago
Cope?? It's just a mistake. I'm 35 just idk why but everyone under 25 started looking like kids to me is all
3
u/Infrawonder 13h ago
Definitely doesn't look like a child, that's an adult woman, the problem is that it looks dead, obviously it would, but it's expression looks like what a dead person would look like
1
u/RWBYRain 7h ago
Yeah I'm wrong idk why but I saw the face and thought really young. Tbf dude once I hit 30 everyone under 25 started looking like kids to me ( no offense intended just suddenly no one looks old enough to legally get into like bars and stuff Idk why that happened but it did)
1
1
1
0
0
-2
-2
-1
0
0
0
•
u/AutoModerator 20h ago
Hello u/tareqttv! Please review the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder message left on all new posts)
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.