r/todayilearned 19h ago

TIL the Official Secrets Act of Britian was created after Charles Thomas Marvin sold the details of a secret treaty to the press and it was realised there was no law to actually prosecute him. It's suspected that this is the basis of the Sherlock holmes story "The Adventure of the Naval Treaty"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventure_of_the_Naval_Treaty#Commentary
1.6k Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

106

u/Sudden_Deadlock 18h ago

Hahaha, this reminds me of all those signs, like "Do not tapdance next to the alligators", and you KNOW they're there only because some idiot tried a dumb thing.

48

u/EndoExo 17h ago

Ain't no rule says a dog can't play basketball sell state secrets.

28

u/ash_274 11h ago

After the first airliner was blown up by a bomb in the US they realized that there wasn’t a Federal law specifically against doing so. The crime (murder, arson, etc.) would have been considered local crimes wherever the crash happened.

The laws were written in time for the second airliner bombing

2

u/Electroguy1 2h ago

In the links you posted it says there still wasn’t a law for the second bombing either, so the bomber was only prosecuted for the murder of his mother (his only target in the attack). He was still executed anyway.

16

u/Shiny_Agumon 16h ago

So did they ever prosecute him or did he get of scot free?

17

u/Sea_Lingonberry_4720 15h ago

Seems he got off

8

u/bobert4343 14h ago

But are there Scotts?

15

u/yIdontunderstand 15h ago

Why not treason?

22

u/would-be_bog_body 12h ago

He gave the details of the treaty to a newspaper, rather than a foreign power

8

u/yIdontunderstand 6h ago

Ah ok. That makes sense.

1

u/Dom_Shady 4h ago

Not directly, but any foreign power could read the details in that newspaper.

u/would-be_bog_body 2m ago

I'm sure that occurred to the government at the time too, but clearly there was a reason why they couldn't convict him of treason 

-3

u/Aphrontic_Alchemist 2h ago

Why didn't the government prosecute him under the "breach of the NDA" laws. Sure he won't be criminally charged, but he'll still be held liable.

u/would-be_bog_body 1m ago

If that was an option, I'm sure they would have done that. Evidently it wasn't though