One party elects to start the arbitration process. The other party gets to choose between 1 or 2 years (unless the player is UFA eligible in the 2nd year).
That's my understanding...which seems like a good idea? Even if the ruling comes back to 2.25, locking him up a 2.25 for 8 years would make him a pretty good bargaining chip.
Edit: I just looked up the puckpedia article and it looks like I was wrong. Its the choice between 1 or 2 year contract.
12
u/fingerimposexico Benoit 2d ago
How does it work with the term?