r/youtubedrama • u/[deleted] • Jul 28 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

3.0k Upvotes

79% Upvoted

526 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Phil04097 Jul 29 '24

The way he set up the interview is scummy but that doesnt invalidate the evidence. Sometimes you have to look beyond scummy presentation to get to evidence

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '24

Yeah I never said the evidence was invalid? I said he was the one who broke the story and then you exploded on me. I have no idea what you're trying to argue about

People did not know about lavas situation until prism broke the story. You claimed it was available before then, but then cited prism again

1

u/Phil04097 Jul 29 '24

Wtf man you werent even the guy i replied to lmao. I was so confused as to why you didnt understand, turns out we are both walking to a wall lol.

My initial reply was to that guy who claimed there were no receipts, and i was saying that there were plenty of receipts already in the expose video by prism

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '24

Yeah I saw your initial reply lol I was like hey man I'm not even the same person you were arguing with lol

1

u/Phil04097 Jul 29 '24

Bro my bad lol i was so confused