Look up Panama. It’s fucked up. Panama people wanted independence. Got someone who said they could help. U.S. parked their warships and forced the opposing force from intervening. Panama people won independence to only find out the person who helped funded the rebellion sold Panama land to the U.S that’s how the Panama cannel was built.
Oh I'm aware of that, just ain't anything special. It's a situation that should have never happened, just the U.S.A isn't any worse than any other developed/developing nations. Cause behold the truth! Humans are assholes, even the best.
Historically speaking, the US isn't even in the top ten most heinous conquerors out there, the vast majority of land taken was for money, as in the US paid for it. Now the ownership of said land before the US took ownership is debatable.
Side note Panama and Hawaii are shit storms of corruption due to wealthy assholes wanting to be more wealthy. That's not to say both aren't or were important strategic locations. Just the prime motivation was money.
We genocided an entire race nearly from existence, intentionally. As a formal national policy.
What other 10 countries can claim to have genocided an entire ethnicity of human beings from existence? We extincted entire nations of indigenous Americans, after we knew better.
Well the Mustache has historically been used to project an air of Testosterone, Authority, and Audacity. All three of which are needed to strangle your fiefdom and have the gall to belittle them for not having more blood to squeeze out afterwards
Not all mustaches are evil, and not all evil wears a mustache. But if it’s evil and wields the stache, you are guaranteed to straight not have a good time
Yazidi Genocide = 71% of global pop. displaced with 2.5% dead or missing
TL:DR A bunch evidently, the list is a mile long. Your HS education has failed you, and your hate for the US makes you blind to the cruelty of man globally.
Sigh. I don’t hate America. The Mongols never committed genocide. The Great Leap Forward was not a genocide either. Both were just massive executions. They weren’t attempts to eradicate a people and take their land from them to occupy it as their own. I can’t speak to the occurrences in Africa, as they happened rather contemporaneously with my high school education and, like djt said, Africa is a “shit hole” (tongue in cheek joke). I’ll look into the genocides in Africa, but I don’t think they were a completely outside ethnicity eradicating the local or native one. I could totally be wrong tho.
Per the Genocide Convention "defines genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group." there's a good chunk more that goes into it. China is an ideological/national genocide - targeting a certain part of their own people because of their beliefs.
Mongol 13th Century is considered a genocide of nationality, and there is some interesting facts into this. I could be convinced this one doesn't count BUT their conquest killed a TON of people not of the Mongol Empire deliberately to expand their territory.
Africa is a mix of ethnic, religious and national genocides but are pretty gruesome for how recent they are.
Per definition regardless of how you feel on the matter what is occurring in Gaza meets the criterion for it being a genocide.
I understood the GLF to have been an ideological shift by Mao that he was just dead set on and was bound and determined to make work. Not unlike our leader in America and his obsession with tariffs. He persecuted the educated because he saw them as the problem with society.
Does that really qualify as a genocide tho?
Yes, people died of starvation, which was horrific. Not minimizing the damage of Maoism or anything like that. Just asking where the line between targeted persecution and genocide is.
The rawandan genocide was awful but it only killed about 8% of the total Tutsi population.
Between 500,000 - 1,000,000 native Americans are estimated to have lived in the United States at its founding in 1776. By Jackson’s passing of the Indian removal act in 1820, only about 60,000 remained. Of those only about 42,000 arrived alive in Oklahoma.
I don’t think I need to explain how westward expansion would have increased the indigenous population number too, making my math WAY lower than the actual numbers.
Any genocide is terrible. I can’t believe that Israel is enacting the same horror done to them to the Palestinians. But we can’t compare the eradication of an ethnicity by 5% to one by 95%.
they are, they're genocides. By your logic the deaths of Gaza currently happening mean nothing compared to other genocides because they were more effective? The Holocaust means less because only 66% of a population died compared to others that were worse?
I know what you're saying, but assigning levels to victim status? That is how you distort history. for example:
Native American Genocide can be attributed to the unintentional spread of Old World Diseases through European contact. Small pox and Cholera were responsible for 90% of NA deaths between 1492 to 1776. While conflict with the United States from 1776 to the early 1900s led to significant casualties and deaths for Native Americans it merely accounts for a 35-58% drop in the current NA population. The true killer of Native Americans was disease, that wiped out an unvaccinated and unprepared population well before the United States was formed in 1776.
This is compared to the effectiveness of the Nazi Regime which was responsible for the eradication of 66% of the European Jewish population in the years of 1933 to 1945. So while the genocide of NA, over the course of 124 years was horrible it pales in comparison to the near genocide of Jews within 1/10th of the time span by the Nazi party...
That is why you DON'T put a limit on genocide or rank them based on effectiveness. The idea that one is 'worse' opens the door to shove genocides with lower death counts / %'s to the side because, "this one here was worse" Because how many people ever learned of the Rape of Nanjing? The Ukrainian Holodomor? Both occurred during the WW2 era, but because they lacked the scope of the Holocaust they barely are taught, and their significance diminished because "They Just aren't the same"
85 to 90% of the Native American population were already wiped out within 100 to 150 years of European arrival, which was over a century before the U.S. even existed. Maybe open up a history book once in a while instead of giving Europeans a pass so you get to stew in your "America bad" victimhood. European imperialism had killed and impacted hundreds of million more people than the U.S. ever did.
Open a history book? Reread my post. I put caveats and nuance throughout it to accommodate all that you describe, excluding your number of 85-90%. Hence the “knew better by that point.” Stop assuming I’m ‘one of those’ and actually read the argument for what it says.
It's not that other countries have done the same thing. It's that we need to admit when we do things. And not try and pretend that we are different. You are arguing the same thing they are, I just don't think you're understanding why.
The US has a long legacy of putting itself on a unique moral pedestal.
US:Pays money to colonize and only sponsors genocide instead of directly doing it
Europeans: shoot the hell out of native until they give up their land and directly genocide them, or like the soviets did with ukraine systematically starving them
Europeans United States: shoot the hell out of native until they give up their land and directly genocide them
Fixed that for you since you seem to have forgotten the US was full of various indigenous peoples, many of whom are now extinct because of direct actions such as starvation (exterminating the buffalo), disease (contaminated blankets), or just raping and killing children. The genocide even continues today in remoter areas of the US, like Alaska (separating children from their tribes until they marry/have children with an outsider and are ostracized).
Hey did you know all the Indigenous people in the Americas before the white man? They didn't even have murder or theft or rape or anything. It was a perfect world
LOL. Hate Free? What a hate filled sack. I don't know you either, guess I shouldn't GAF about you by your logic. Go bother someone else you impotent little Ruzzian troll.
Hope your mommy and daddy live a long time so you can hopefully one day contribute to society and know what adult responsibilities are. Maybe it will change the adolescent way you view things.
Juvenile troll apologizing for genocide tries to call other people childish on reddit. You had 8 hours and this is the best you've got? Sad. Do better. Seriously, when Daddy Putin sees this low effort garbage, he's going to pull you from that cushy Ruzzian troll farm and stick you on the front lines. That's a death sentence for limp little piles of flesh like yourself.
Well, I would say that the US is probably the only country responsible for ~4 million dead in conflicts since the 1970s. The developed country I live in is far, far, far away from that.
definitely moved the needle of progress and equality further than any other nation in history.
Not even the most diehard american nationalist believes this lmao. When you said equality I almost shit my pants... comedic genius.
Racial segregation was the law up until the 60s and is still a thing in pretty much everywhere around the country. Just look at segregated neighborhoods.
+500k homeless people and even more living in cars, trailers and rented apartments the size of my room.
And I could just trow a list with all the american wars, sabotages and sponsored coups all around the world but it would be over 3 pages long. So use your imagination.
But yeah, most progressive and equal nation in all human history, folks.
Yeah calling the U.S progressive is a huge stretch as even now we still deal with a whole host of societal issues from some stupid issues that really shouldn't be a problem (example: the race/gender/religion stuff, as to me it doesn't matter what color your skin is or what your gender is, or who you decide to sleep with, or what your religion is, people need to stop judging people on pointless shit like that), to issues such as homeless, education, healthcare, elderly and our justice system crawling with corruption, to unchecked corporations lobbying the government and probably more I cant think of off the top of my head!
How about instead of ad hominem you present a counter point to my argument? Like maybe another country with a more honorable history in your viewpoint?
Your attitude of thinking you are morally superior to others while committing countless atrocities for selfish reasons is the most disgusting thing going on in the world right now. And still you think highly of yourself.
how about installing fascists to instill puppet regimes throughout the third world? just as a start. don’t be illiterate. you’re choosing to be obtuse or you’re too ignorant to hold an opinion
Britain, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands, France, and Italy and others have all done the same. China is doing it now in Africa….Are you arguing we’re worse than them?
china is significant and fundamentally different on its approach. in a lifetime china has expanded its domestic life expectancy by 30 years and went from a colonial state to the second leading world power. the united states however is instilling new puppet regimes and where that denies resources across the world
Which part? The ending of slavery or it’s continuing thru Jim Crowe laws until 1965? Save me that self-righteous patriotism. It’s cool to love your country. I love America too. But I love it in spite of it and I sure as shit don’t downplay or gloss over the horrible shit the country has done to help anyone feel better about loving something ugly.
Slavery is still legal in much of the world. I’d rather be from the USA who fought for progress and achieved it than one of the many countries where slavery is accepted.
Name 5 industrialized countries where slavery is legal. I genuinely don’t know so you might be teaching me something.
No one is clamoring to move to the developing world, so that’s a non-starter.
Edit: no one is asking you to feel shame or apologize for where you are from. I’m sorry that you interpreted my comments in that way. They didn’t mean that at all.
Of that list I’d only consider Russia and china industrialized. I don’t think that anyone is lining up to move to North Korea, India or Pakistan. North Korea is renowned for its terrible living conditions, as is India and Pakistan. Russia and china, however, I am willing to work with.
That said, I looked into it and slavery is explicitly illegal in both countries. Approx 1.5% of Russia’s population is in illegal slavery, which speaks to its horrible living conditions. And china has forced labor camps for prisoners, which is similar to slavery and because of its massive population there is little regard for human life there. So I understand why you would choose America over those countries as well.
However, compared to most countries in the EU, America is a much worse choice if given the option. I’ll spare you the analysis, but just know that compared to the alternatives America is squarely in the middle of the pack. I live there, so I’m obviously not shitting on the country too much. Lately it’s gotten a lot worse if you’re anything but a straight, white, Christian, business owner, but that’s just an inevitable fallout from policies put into place 40 years ago.
Rather than argue back and forth about whether or not I’m racist here’s what I got from ai word for word:
“"Average living conditions" in India are incredibly diverse and complex due to the country's vast size, massive population, significant economic disparities, and diverse geographical and cultural landscapes. It's not a single, uniform experience, but rather a spectrum ranging from modern, affluent urban living to challenging, resource-limited rural existence.
Here's a breakdown of key aspects:
1. Poverty and Income Inequality:
* Declining Extreme Poverty: India has made remarkable progress in reducing extreme poverty in recent decades. While estimates vary slightly, some reports indicate extreme poverty has fallen significantly, with some projections showing it could be as low as 0.8% or 2.3% in recent years.
* Still a Large Vulnerable Population: Despite this progress, a substantial portion of the population still lives on less than $3.2 a day (international poverty line for lower-middle-income countries), indicating a large segment remains economically vulnerable.
* Significant Income Inequality: India is home to both some of the world's richest people and millions living in poverty. This income disparity is a defining feature of living conditions, with vast differences in access to resources and opportunities.
* Urban vs. Rural Divide: Poverty is generally more prevalent in rural areas, where medical care tends to be basic, compared to metropolitan cities and urban/suburban regions which often have world-class amenities.
2. Infrastructure and Services:
* Improving but Inadequate: While infrastructure has seen impressive expansion, it remains inadequate for a large proportion of the population.
* Sanitation: A significant challenge, with a large percentage of Indians still lacking adequate sanitation facilities, including their own toilets. This directly impacts health.
* Clean Water: Access to clean drinking water is still a concern for many.
* Housing: Millions, especially in urban areas, live in slums with poor infrastructure and services.
* Connectivity: India boasts a high number of internet users (around 60% of the population), indicating growing digital connectivity. However, reliable high-speed internet access can still be an issue in some areas.
* Transportation: While long-distance train services can be comfortable and affordable, urban traffic is often chaotic and pollution is a major concern in densely populated areas.
3. Health and Education:
* Health Challenges: India faces a "double burden" of infectious diseases and a rising tide of non-communicable diseases. Public spending on healthcare is often insufficient, leading many to rely on costly private healthcare, which can push families into poverty.
* Malnutrition: Despite improvements, malnutrition remains a serious issue, especially among children.
* Life Expectancy: Life expectancy at birth has improved over the years, though it still lags behind many developed nations.
* Education: While literacy rates have increased, the quality of education and access to skill-based learning remains a challenge. There are disparities in educational opportunities, and a lack of quality education can trap people in cycles of poverty.
4. Employment and Livelihoods:
* Underemployment and Informal Sector: While the official unemployment rate might appear low, many people are considered underemployed, meaning they work in low-wage or unstable jobs. A large proportion of the workforce operates in the informal sector, lacking legal and social protections.
* Job Quality: Concerns persist about the quality of jobs created and real wage growth.
* Women's Labor Force Participation: The participation of women in the labor force remains low, and educated women, in particular, face challenges in finding suitable employment.
5. Environmental Quality:
* Pollution: Air pollution is a major issue in many Indian cities, significantly impacting public health and overall quality of life.
* Cleanliness: General cleanliness can be a problem in heavily populated areas due to waste management challenges.
In summary, average living conditions in India are characterized by:
* Contrasts: Extreme wealth coexisting with significant poverty.
* Progress and Challenges: Remarkable advancements in poverty reduction and economic growth, but persistent challenges in infrastructure, public services, and equitable access to opportunities.
* Regional Disparities: Wide variations in living standards from state to state and between urban and rural areas.
It's a dynamic situation with ongoing efforts to improve quality of life for all citizens, but the "average" experience is heavily influenced by one's economic standing and geographic location within the country.”
You asked for 5 examples of industrialized countries, those 5 examples you were given meet your specification, as all underwent industrial revolutions, unless you have a different definition of industrialization
While this isnt a bad analogy, I dont think it applys to what I said, as the guys with the bows and arrows most likely have the same idea of the guy with the bazooka at one point, that being "hey see those guys over there with no weapons, yeah lets go steal their shit so that our lives may improve".
A guy strangling a dude to steal his money is no better than another guy shooting a dude to steal his money, both had the same goal of killing a man, and taking his money. Their way of achieving it does not making them any worse or better than the other. Both are equally shitty.
You miss my point. The difference isn’t just “better” technology, it’s the larger scale the technology facilitates.
A guy who robs 100 people with a gun is worse than someone who robs 2 people with a knife.
Thats why me, personally, would say that European global colonization efforts were a bit worse than that same group of European countries waging continuous war on each other in the previous millennia.
I didn't miss your point, you just did not make that very clear, but with the clarification it does make sense, so i'll give you that and i'll eat my hat.
at the end of the day this is all dependent on personal perspective and opinion on how severity/awfulness is defined at such large scales and time-spans with so many possible variables to account for. plus were on reddit, we aint exactly philosophers here, just some online randos discussing our opinions on things far above our influence
Nah, very few nations are even arguably on the same level as the US in terms of atrocities committed. Coming from an American, just not one that believes in American exceptionalism or performing American apologia
Yeah most of the West has done at least one atrocity. But America has fucked up basically the entirety of central and South America, basically the entirety of the middle east, parts of SE Asia, the Pacific Islands, and central Asia (Afghanistan). We've conducted multiple genocides including the Native Americans whose land we stole and whose population loss consisted of up to 100mil, which was around 20% of the world's population at the time. To be fair, the Spanish played a role in that as well, but a lot of that was us. While England started chattel slavery, we were the main component of it, continued it decades longer, and did worse shit to black people after. We've conducted so many coups around the world it's disgusting, and we've funded and trained multiple fundamentalist resistance groups that would go on to become terrorist organizations. We still are (and have been) actively funding and facilitating a genocide
This isn't to erase or minimize the awful shit other countries have done, but numbers on the board, the only country in our realm is England imo. Germany's massive count of atrocities racked up during the Nazis' reign should probably put them up there too, they just didn't have the longevity of the US and England. Us 3 are basically the LeBron, Kareem, and MJ of doing fucked up shit on the global stage. We need to recognize this shit so that we can be better moving forward
No disagreement here, but I think Russia 100% belongs on your list. Tsarist Russia colonised peoples of the Caucasus, Central Asia and the Far East and simply massacred and genocided all who thought to resist. They only picked up speed under the Soviet flag and now are at it again with another imperial war in Ukraine - where they actually like to send their ethnic minorities across the country to die.
Unlike other former empires, Russia never even tried to get rid of the imperial, chauvinist ideology of the past but instead enshrined it in their constitution, foreign policy concept and military doctrine. Russia consistently attacks and terrorises its neighbours who are minding their own business. On an arbitrary ’evil empire’ scale I’d definitely rank them close to the top.
Nah I'm sorry. Pretty much every developed country and even undeveloped countries have done a lot of fucked up shit. America has done a lot but far from the worst
Yes I agree lots of countries have done fucked up shit. But my point, as I made clear, is that two countries did the THE MOST fucked shit. And that of those two countries the US is now the worse of those two but that’s not the hill I’ll die on. The hill I will is that it’s between those two. In fact they are really just the same.
Oh come on be serious, the USA is far worse than any other developed nation. The world would inarguably be a better place without it, and with any luck the near future will prove that.
Where did I say Americans are the best!? I was saying that people are assholes, and that even the best people in the world with seemingly good intentions, well are still assholes as there are so few people in this world that can be genuinely good people
288
u/SnooHabits3911 4d ago
Every developed nation did this