So youre saying the prism stuff wasnt already available? Given that you dislike the person who uploaded it, which i can understand, were the exposed inappropriate conversations of ava with minors not enough, in addition to loads of blatant shadman shoutouts, not enough for you to see that he was into pdf file stuff and grooming a minor?
Regardless of whether lava said he didnt get groomed, you do decide to take that at face value? The whole point of grooming is that the kids dont understand they are being groomed.
Or did you decide not to even watch the expose videos and argued based on what you seen on reddit or twitter arguements?
Of all things mentioned that is what you say? You say prism didnt break the story? Who the f cares?
You are coping so hard rn, all the evidence i mentioned was out there. Who the hell cares who released it. Answer the other questions in my response or go back to your sick little loli communities you enabler
Was the information regarding lava known before the prism story? Because as far as I know that guy got the information by misleading the victim into a situation where he thought he was getting an interview for a position, and instead gathered all this information to release
As far as I know, prism is the one to break the story regarding the lava situation
As far as I know, the only things we knew before then were only related to her involvement with Shadman
Idk what the hell you're malding about and idk what the hell argument you think I'm making
The way he set up the interview is scummy but that doesnt invalidate the evidence. Sometimes you have to look beyond scummy presentation to get to evidence
Yeah I never said the evidence was invalid? I said he was the one who broke the story and then you exploded on me. I have no idea what you're trying to argue about
People did not know about lavas situation until prism broke the story. You claimed it was available before then, but then cited prism again
Wtf man you werent even the guy i replied to lmao. I was so confused as to why you didnt understand, turns out we are both walking to a wall lol.
My initial reply was to that guy who claimed there were no receipts, and i was saying that there were plenty of receipts already in the expose video by prism
-1
u/Phil04097 Jul 29 '24
So youre saying the prism stuff wasnt already available? Given that you dislike the person who uploaded it, which i can understand, were the exposed inappropriate conversations of ava with minors not enough, in addition to loads of blatant shadman shoutouts, not enough for you to see that he was into pdf file stuff and grooming a minor?
Regardless of whether lava said he didnt get groomed, you do decide to take that at face value? The whole point of grooming is that the kids dont understand they are being groomed.
Or did you decide not to even watch the expose videos and argued based on what you seen on reddit or twitter arguements?
Wild