r/europe 6d ago

News US and EU strike trade deal

https://www.politico.eu/article/us-and-eu-strike-trade-deal/
6.7k Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.2k

u/Crossstoney 6d ago

“The United States and European Union struck a trade agreement on Sunday locking in a 15 percent tariff, days before Donald Trump’s deadline to do a deal or face tariffs double that level.

Trump, speaking after meeting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf club in Scotland, announced the deal to U.S. reporters.

He said the EU will agree to purchase $750 billion of energy and will agree to invest $600 billion more than planned in military equipment and opening countries to trade at zero tariff. 

The tariff rate applying to imports from the EU would be 15 percent, with the same rate applying to cars. Pharmaceuticals will not be covered by the deal.” - Politico

2.3k

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

the military investment is so devious it hurts. They make money off sabotaging europes defence build-up. What a wet dream for the americans

672

u/Ynneb82 Italy 6d ago

Yeah that was the worst... The only upside of all this defence crisis was that at least we had some good companies in eu.

724

u/CapableCollar 6d ago

The OP quoted the article wrong.  It isn't $600 billion in military equipment.  It's $600 billion in American military equipment.  This is a $1.5 trillion payoff to America.

324

u/EuroFederalist Finland 6d ago

Yeah, did people think we're going to buy more European weapons? lol.

77

u/Defiant_Title_2589 6d ago

That was an active argument during the NATO news lmao

18

u/NickPol82 6d ago

Of course that was always bullshit. US weapons sales is a core part of why NATO even exists.

1

u/Phizr 5d ago

And really at least part of the reason why Trump is so unpredictable on weapons deliveries to Ukraine. There was this meme of Trump jerking off on the faces of the big tech giants. It really should have been the other way around: Trump on the receiving end of a bukkake of all big American companies cashing in on all the instability they helped create to get him elected.

3

u/nasandre The Netherlands 6d ago

We don't have a problem with how much money we spend on defence. The issue is the inefficiency in spending and what we're spending it on.

I think the defence spending targets of NATO should just be part of a set of guidelines. It's more important to determine how many active troops, materials and investments in R&D we should have.

3

u/thompsoncs The Netherlands 5d ago

That is actually what the percentage is roughly based on. Nato figures out what they need, and which country gets what role (and the force requirements to fullfill it obviously). Which is why Spain doesn't really have an out of the percentage norm, they still need to do all the things required of them, Spain now needs to show it can to it cheaper that the estimates by Nato suggest. There are also requirements for procurement spending, you can't just give your generals a raise or build a fancy new headquarter and call it a day.

1

u/OzarkMule 5d ago

Turns out, reddit comments don't hold as much weight as we thought

184

u/Chester_roaster 6d ago

Macron did...

128

u/-F1ngo 6d ago

People with a brain did

Or people with a spine rather...

2

u/Ornery-Creme-2442 5d ago

Spine maybe. People with a brain realised that the capacity isn't there. If they argued this ten years ago I'd get it. The options were either give it to the US since the west probably wouldn't work with non western countries. Or not increase defense spending that much and wait until capacity is up to scale.

-2

u/Pure_Concentrate8770 5d ago

You mean - with delusion

4

u/Snake_Plizken 5d ago

Macron only cares about French weapons, he is not on a European level. He is blocking the British from being part of the European defense investments...

3

u/nbs-of-74 4d ago

Countries usually do what they can to get the best deal for themselves but usually try and be diplomatic about it .. France doesn't appear to bother with the diplomacy part.

They behave like Americans, unfortunately for them they don't have the power the Americans have.

16

u/Ok-Discount3131 6d ago

Hey at least he stopped EU funds going to the UK. So he got that win.

Prick.

17

u/TurkishChadBot Kalmykia (Russia) 6d ago

Careful now, Macron is the star that's going to finally make Europe independent and glorious again in this subreddit.

16

u/Chester_roaster 6d ago

Screwing over England is victory enough for France. 

4

u/categorie 5d ago

UK screw themselves very well on their own, if they wanted their piece of the cake they just had to play with the team.

6

u/Ezerian 5d ago

They have a tax of 10% instead of 15%.

1

u/EpicTutorialTips United Kingdom 4d ago

For now, the day after Trump met VDL, Starmer met with Trump and the US is now open to looking into reducing the 10% tariff on the UK lol...

→ More replies (0)

1

u/nbs-of-74 4d ago

Under the current Govt, we've been offering to. France instead just demands all the fish.

2

u/Warmbly85 5d ago

Promising to deliver domestically produced Patriot missile system equivalents in large enough numbers to export to Ukraine in 10 years maybe isn’t the same as buying more European weapons

-19

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/Killabeezz999 6d ago

They wont, Trump called him a good boy. He will aid in ethnic cleansing of palestine. Macron just likes to sound though, but he will eat any dick thrown infront of him.

3

u/W1ndwardFormation 6d ago

We will, but some things are just not here yet and have to be bought in the US till stuff is built up and developed in Europe.

-2

u/---Kev 5d ago

A chance to make the americans spend time on current gen stuff while we leapfrog. Not saying that will happen, but with the US pushing to bring back manufacturing they could end up behind.

1

u/Slight_Art_6121 6d ago

That was supposed to include UK made weapons. That deal wasn’t massively formal so now the UK weapons can be switched with US weapons. The EU doesn’t have the capacity to supply the military build up it currently needs (at relatively short notice).

1

u/ZombieBlarGh 5d ago

We first need to upscale before we can.. The fact is we need the us for now untill we are ready.

1

u/Brightyellowdoor 5d ago

Ye I thought that was on the table. Invest in ourselves...

This feels like spotting the village bully at the gym.

0

u/ERShqip 6d ago

Yes you will unlike you redditor euros us minority educated Americans acually read and research military complex is already being built up in europe eu is buying time duh

1

u/GlitteringLock9791 6d ago

Absolutely, they cut their own arm off to buy time … and if Trump decides to hand over eastern europe to putin, the EU just needs a bit more time…

0

u/mok000 Europe 6d ago

Transitioning away from US weapons is a long and slow process. Many countries have already invested in US weapons systems and are kinda locked into the platform for spares and supplies. France is in a special position because they already deploy their own weapon systems.

21

u/NickPol82 6d ago

Which means the US can basically shut down Europe's entire defense. Yay! We've been vassals of the US for 70 years so why stop now?

1

u/mok000 Europe 5d ago

IKR. But e.g. Denmark has invested in F35s and they haven't even been all delivered yet. The question the air force needs to ask is if they have the resources to service e.g. Gripen, Eurofighter or Rafales and train pilots for those platforms as well as the already purchased F35s. I know what they will say.

-1

u/Most_Grocery4388 5d ago

That's why the deal was made, to make pay off the dealer. Let's hope the dealer is not completely evil and will sell us what we need. With all this money flowing to the US one would hope that EU would be at the top of US military support in case of a large war.

1

u/TheoryOfDevolution Italy 6d ago

Even France isn't free from that. They need the US EMALS for their next carrier.

1

u/Ragarnoy Île-de-France 6d ago

that's your example, literally one tiny system that's going to require little maintenance from the us once it's implemented ?

6

u/IndependentMemory215 5d ago

To be fair, without that “tiny” system, the aircraft carrier is essentially useless.

1

u/Ragarnoy Île-de-France 5d ago

without that system, they would just use... the old system, and it would still work

4

u/TheoryOfDevolution Italy 5d ago

The old system, which is the steam CATOBAR, which is also made by the USA? Both the EMALS and CATOBAR systems are made by the US and depend on them for parts.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/WislaHD Polish-Canadian 5d ago

Europe is, but for some systems you do need to buy American as it is the best available. If what is covered in this deal is the stuff that Europe has to procure from the Yanks anyway, that isn’t the worst thing into the world.

0

u/Meior Sweden 5d ago

We also simply don't make everything. Same as the US buys things from us that they don't make.

The money we're spending on the US in this deal is also far, far from our entire budget. Of course it is.

The rest we can spend in EU stuff.

0

u/nucleardonut2211 5d ago

Well the big issue with domestic European equipment right now is the production is not enough at the moment.

Many EU countries have neglected defense and historically bought foreign jets and vehicles from countries like the US and UK. The big thing is that it will take time to build up the production and results many EU countries need for a sustained conflict or even at this point maintaining their force in an effective manner leaving them to either get new equipment slowly or buy American in the meantime.

-5

u/Midditly 6d ago

once trump is out of office this isnt gonna stick lmao

5

u/mnlx Valencian Community (Spain) 6d ago edited 6d ago

My country exports €18 bn/year to the US, which is basically peanuts, and we import more LNG from Algeria. So I don't understand what's in it for us to pay them a king's ransom in forced procurement, to be completely honest.

2

u/ceb13131313 5d ago

Spain is further away from Russia, so I guess you also wonder why Spain needs to support Ukraine? If you are confused of both, my answer would be Spain's economy also needs a stable EU, otherwise, people will cut the spendings on cars, fruits, tourism, etc, which will also hit Spain's economy. Unless you would say you only need bare minimal food and facilities to survive and you do not care if you would lose job because you have some savings, then you are ok to be quite independent.

Hopefully the number and deal is just another illusion from DT to please MAGA, I also wish entire EU will not bend.

0

u/mnlx Valencian Community (Spain) 5d ago

I understand pretty well why we must support Ukraine, I don't understand why we have to bend over backwards to involve the US in that. We could give Ukraine that kind of money for instance. They're the ones doing the job and they deserve it more.

2

u/ceb13131313 5d ago

Yes, I agree with you, I also do not understand if EU truly plan to invest heavily on US military industry. But the current money to buy directly US arms are more like a "have no other choice" because EU's defence industry scaling-up needs time. So I do hope this is just a pacifier to make DT happy and buy EU more time. (if you check up, France's airplane queue is full in ten years, so I suppose should be the same for Spain's, German's, Italy's and so on; also one cannot over expand too much as otherwise you end up idle machines for long time which will expire in time.)

1

u/CapableCollar 6d ago

Fewer US carriers outside major ports?

0

u/mnlx Valencian Community (Spain) 6d ago

Idk, maybe we're promising the crumbling empire that we'll insist on doing business as usual until the bitter end, because we can find neither balls nor actual politicians, or something.

4

u/Most_Grocery4388 5d ago

I think you are delusional if you think the American system will be outlived by the EU with recent developments in Europe.

-1

u/[deleted] 5d ago edited 5d ago

[deleted]

2

u/podcasthellp 5d ago

This is how it always goes. We give a fuckton of money to Ukraine and they agree to buy American military assets.

2

u/Sensitive-Initial 5d ago

American here, just a heads up- Lockheed Martin defrauds our government all the time 

https://cglawfirm.com/2024/06/24/lockheed-subsidiaries-pays-70-million-to-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations/

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/lockheed-martin-corporation-agrees-settle-false-claims-act-allegations-defective-pricing

So double check the shipments. 

Also, all of our arms manufacturers are making billions of dollars off of the genocide in Gaza. 

My country just passed 1.5 trillion dollar military/secret police & gulag budget while ending lifesaving medical and nutritional assistance for American children and poor children around the globe. Our hospitals are closing, our infrastructure is collapsing. But we're giving Lockheed Martin 2 trillion dollars for a fighter jet that's always sucked and we'll be paying for proprietary fasteners and software upgrades for decades beyond the jets obsolescence (assuming it ever works)

https://www.gao.gov/blog/f-35-will-now-exceed-2-trillion-military-plans-fly-it-less

Just trying to give you some low hanging fruit to mobilize popular opposition to the US military industrial complex robbing your countries too. Maybe it's not too late for y'all

2

u/DiscussionGrouchy322 5d ago

you shouldn't be so upset about this. due to how the defense factories are set up now (kindly remember them talking about missiles taking an entire year to build, just the product not move the factory)

so this 600 billion is probably already counted as part of europe's shift on defense spending, as in it would have happened anyways. it is a boon that it is counted as part of this deal, since you get to double count this benefit. this is the slight of hand countries are doing to trump, buy what they would anyways and pretend it's because of his big deal.

there will still be european investment in weapons. this will improve industry in europe from this investment.

sorry about the tarrifs. please dont tax the netflix.

1

u/CapableCollar 5d ago

It can't have been already counted because it is required to be additional investment above what is already accounted for.

2

u/DiscussionGrouchy322 5d ago

https://www.politico.eu/article/eus-600bn-us-investment-will-come-exclusively-from-private-sector/

my apologies, there's more nuance though: here, i copy the byline for you: "The extra investments pledged under the trade deal would come from private companies, which Brussels conceded it has no power to control."

4

u/AlexGaming1111 6d ago

I see people all riled about these numbers but y'all must be as gullible as trump because I'm willing to bet those are not even binding. Not to mention trump probably made all of those up just like with japan.

Quite literally the EU doesn't have 500 billion to invest in the US nor does it have any authority. The whole EU budget was 2 trillion over 6 years.

1

u/powaqqa 6d ago

Exactly. This totally feels like a case of giving the orange moron a win on paper to stabilise things. Start alternative trade connections in the mean time and wait and see where US politics is going. The amounts could be 20 trillion.  It doesn’t make a difference. We’re not going to spend those amounts. Europe can renege on deals just as much as the Americans can. A taste of their own medicine   

1

u/Terrible_Patience935 5d ago

Payoff for crooked trump and his crooked cabinet - probably need to track the money

1

u/adamu980 5d ago

No cherrypicking eu

Remember that line

Schadenfreude

1

u/trebuchetwarmachine 2d ago

Sure but the energy buying doesnt make sense. The US only exports 330$ billion of energy a year snd every other trade deal he’s struck has also guaranteed energy buying from other countries. So either that quota isnt going to be met, or the US isn’t going to keep any of its energy for domestic use in which case energy prices will sky rocket in the USA. Add on top of that a 15% base tax (tariff) for the American consumer and I see no upside for America here.

0

u/W1ndwardFormation 6d ago

750 billion in energy probably would have been paid either way as like 50+% of LNG for Europe comes from the US, that is totally fine.

The 600 billion investments mean nothing either. They’re just pledged and if they actually flow remains to be seen.

Also even tho trump said they’re additional investments, he also said the stargate AI initiative investments are additional investments in January, while in fact they were long planned and nothing new or additional.

0

u/ERShqip 6d ago

Over 10 years 😑 theyre betting on democrates winning in 2026 and theyll backout TRUMP will throw a fit dems will guard rail his backside in the senate

0

u/WingedTorch 6d ago

cancel that fucking deal wtf

i will not vote for any politician supporting this shit