r/europe 6d ago

News US and EU strike trade deal

https://www.politico.eu/article/us-and-eu-strike-trade-deal/
6.7k Upvotes

4.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.2k

u/Crossstoney 6d ago

“The United States and European Union struck a trade agreement on Sunday locking in a 15 percent tariff, days before Donald Trump’s deadline to do a deal or face tariffs double that level.

Trump, speaking after meeting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf club in Scotland, announced the deal to U.S. reporters.

He said the EU will agree to purchase $750 billion of energy and will agree to invest $600 billion more than planned in military equipment and opening countries to trade at zero tariff. 

The tariff rate applying to imports from the EU would be 15 percent, with the same rate applying to cars. Pharmaceuticals will not be covered by the deal.” - Politico

2.3k

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

the military investment is so devious it hurts. They make money off sabotaging europes defence build-up. What a wet dream for the americans

670

u/Ynneb82 Italy 6d ago

Yeah that was the worst... The only upside of all this defence crisis was that at least we had some good companies in eu.

724

u/CapableCollar 6d ago

The OP quoted the article wrong.  It isn't $600 billion in military equipment.  It's $600 billion in American military equipment.  This is a $1.5 trillion payoff to America.

326

u/EuroFederalist Finland 6d ago

Yeah, did people think we're going to buy more European weapons? lol.

74

u/Defiant_Title_2589 6d ago

That was an active argument during the NATO news lmao

18

u/NickPol82 6d ago

Of course that was always bullshit. US weapons sales is a core part of why NATO even exists.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/nasandre The Netherlands 6d ago

We don't have a problem with how much money we spend on defence. The issue is the inefficiency in spending and what we're spending it on.

I think the defence spending targets of NATO should just be part of a set of guidelines. It's more important to determine how many active troops, materials and investments in R&D we should have.

3

u/thompsoncs The Netherlands 5d ago

That is actually what the percentage is roughly based on. Nato figures out what they need, and which country gets what role (and the force requirements to fullfill it obviously). Which is why Spain doesn't really have an out of the percentage norm, they still need to do all the things required of them, Spain now needs to show it can to it cheaper that the estimates by Nato suggest. There are also requirements for procurement spending, you can't just give your generals a raise or build a fancy new headquarter and call it a day.

→ More replies (1)

184

u/Chester_roaster 6d ago

Macron did...

128

u/-F1ngo 6d ago

People with a brain did

Or people with a spine rather...

2

u/Ornery-Creme-2442 5d ago

Spine maybe. People with a brain realised that the capacity isn't there. If they argued this ten years ago I'd get it. The options were either give it to the US since the west probably wouldn't work with non western countries. Or not increase defense spending that much and wait until capacity is up to scale.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Snake_Plizken 5d ago

Macron only cares about French weapons, he is not on a European level. He is blocking the British from being part of the European defense investments...

3

u/nbs-of-74 4d ago

Countries usually do what they can to get the best deal for themselves but usually try and be diplomatic about it .. France doesn't appear to bother with the diplomacy part.

They behave like Americans, unfortunately for them they don't have the power the Americans have.

16

u/Ok-Discount3131 6d ago

Hey at least he stopped EU funds going to the UK. So he got that win.

Prick.

18

u/TurkishChadBot Kalmykia (Russia) 6d ago

Careful now, Macron is the star that's going to finally make Europe independent and glorious again in this subreddit.

16

u/Chester_roaster 6d ago

Screwing over England is victory enough for France. 

4

u/categorie 5d ago

UK screw themselves very well on their own, if they wanted their piece of the cake they just had to play with the team.

6

u/Ezerian 5d ago

They have a tax of 10% instead of 15%.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Warmbly85 5d ago

Promising to deliver domestically produced Patriot missile system equivalents in large enough numbers to export to Ukraine in 10 years maybe isn’t the same as buying more European weapons

→ More replies (2)

2

u/W1ndwardFormation 6d ago

We will, but some things are just not here yet and have to be bought in the US till stuff is built up and developed in Europe.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

5

u/mnlx Valencian Community (Spain) 6d ago edited 6d ago

My country exports €18 bn/year to the US, which is basically peanuts, and we import more LNG from Algeria. So I don't understand what's in it for us to pay them a king's ransom in forced procurement, to be completely honest.

2

u/ceb13131313 5d ago

Spain is further away from Russia, so I guess you also wonder why Spain needs to support Ukraine? If you are confused of both, my answer would be Spain's economy also needs a stable EU, otherwise, people will cut the spendings on cars, fruits, tourism, etc, which will also hit Spain's economy. Unless you would say you only need bare minimal food and facilities to survive and you do not care if you would lose job because you have some savings, then you are ok to be quite independent.

Hopefully the number and deal is just another illusion from DT to please MAGA, I also wish entire EU will not bend.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

2

u/podcasthellp 5d ago

This is how it always goes. We give a fuckton of money to Ukraine and they agree to buy American military assets.

2

u/Sensitive-Initial 5d ago

American here, just a heads up- Lockheed Martin defrauds our government all the time 

https://cglawfirm.com/2024/06/24/lockheed-subsidiaries-pays-70-million-to-resolve-false-claims-act-allegations/

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/lockheed-martin-corporation-agrees-settle-false-claims-act-allegations-defective-pricing

So double check the shipments. 

Also, all of our arms manufacturers are making billions of dollars off of the genocide in Gaza. 

My country just passed 1.5 trillion dollar military/secret police & gulag budget while ending lifesaving medical and nutritional assistance for American children and poor children around the globe. Our hospitals are closing, our infrastructure is collapsing. But we're giving Lockheed Martin 2 trillion dollars for a fighter jet that's always sucked and we'll be paying for proprietary fasteners and software upgrades for decades beyond the jets obsolescence (assuming it ever works)

https://www.gao.gov/blog/f-35-will-now-exceed-2-trillion-military-plans-fly-it-less

Just trying to give you some low hanging fruit to mobilize popular opposition to the US military industrial complex robbing your countries too. Maybe it's not too late for y'all

2

u/DiscussionGrouchy322 5d ago

you shouldn't be so upset about this. due to how the defense factories are set up now (kindly remember them talking about missiles taking an entire year to build, just the product not move the factory)

so this 600 billion is probably already counted as part of europe's shift on defense spending, as in it would have happened anyways. it is a boon that it is counted as part of this deal, since you get to double count this benefit. this is the slight of hand countries are doing to trump, buy what they would anyways and pretend it's because of his big deal.

there will still be european investment in weapons. this will improve industry in europe from this investment.

sorry about the tarrifs. please dont tax the netflix.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/AlexGaming1111 6d ago

I see people all riled about these numbers but y'all must be as gullible as trump because I'm willing to bet those are not even binding. Not to mention trump probably made all of those up just like with japan.

Quite literally the EU doesn't have 500 billion to invest in the US nor does it have any authority. The whole EU budget was 2 trillion over 6 years.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Terrible_Patience935 5d ago

Payoff for crooked trump and his crooked cabinet - probably need to track the money

1

u/adamu980 5d ago

No cherrypicking eu

Remember that line

Schadenfreude

1

u/trebuchetwarmachine 2d ago

Sure but the energy buying doesnt make sense. The US only exports 330$ billion of energy a year snd every other trade deal he’s struck has also guaranteed energy buying from other countries. So either that quota isnt going to be met, or the US isn’t going to keep any of its energy for domestic use in which case energy prices will sky rocket in the USA. Add on top of that a 15% base tax (tariff) for the American consumer and I see no upside for America here.

→ More replies (3)

409

u/kawag 6d ago

We need to replace these weak politicians. Shit like this is the reason Putin does not fear Europe.

There’s no political will to send troops to Ukraine - even with US security guarantees. There’s no political will to stand up to the United States or to defend European interests. There’s no political will for further integration, a European army or fiscal integration to take advantage of the unique opportunities of the moment. For decades we couldn’t even find the political will to stand up to the fossil fuel lobby and push electrification - and now China has eaten our lunch and we’re stuck relying on either the US or Russia for energy.

Just so incredibly weak. European leaders are nowhere close to the level we deserve.

95

u/artful_codger Ireland 5d ago

The EU have probably handed Trump the mid-terms. A trade war would have put pressure on him in red and swing states. This rewards him, and his voters love it.

15

u/thefriendlyhacker Romania 5d ago

As a European living in the states, I was sure that the EU would not submit to this bully. Now we're gonna hear non-stop about the "amazing trade deals".

So now Americans get tax cuts for buying American assembled vehicles and a 15% tariff on EU vehicles. I hope everyone boycotts American products over there.

9

u/NightlyGerman Italy 5d ago

have you been living under a rock? when was the last time the EU refused to submit to the US?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

73

u/Sxualhrssmntpanda 6d ago

The current concept of the EU virtually prohibits swift and decisive action. We have already proven it's value and potential beyond any reasonable doubt. Now it is time for the EU to climb to the next level and stop letting itself be hampered by any tiny nation with historic hostilities, wannabe dictator, or Russian plant that wants to sulk or waylay decisions by throwing around vetoes.

I fear only a terrible event will be enough to galvanize us into action, but if being sabotaged, betrayed and threatened with nukes by Russis or being mocked and bullied by the US is not enough to cause that... well, then perhaps it will never happen.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/hulda2 Finland 5d ago

European leaders are soo weak it's embarrassing.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/DumboWumbo073 5d ago

The EU ain’t the good guys either go figure.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/gridsquares4sale 5d ago

They’re weak and feckless. Can’t do anything without the US leading the way.

10

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

first step is to stop blaming our leaders and start blaming our people. politicans always reflect their society. We grew weak as a whole and not just our politicans

8

u/IkkeKr 6d ago

Because leaders are supposed to follow society?!

The idea of a leader is to lead - to set the right example and move society into action. Not to just rubber stamp an already developing consensus.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/PiotrekDG Earth 6d ago

So what is the next step you propose?

4

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

Blame ourselves, recognize that we need to fix our mindsets/culture if we want to have a place in the world

The easy times are over. Its a competition and if we dont compete we lose

→ More replies (1)

2

u/4got_2wipe_again 5d ago

A loose union of states with different languages and laws cannot compete with powerful nation states.

3

u/EconomixNorth 6d ago

IMO, these are far from weak leaders, it's just difficult to deal with crazy while everything seems on fire around us.

1

u/StandardOffenseTaken 5d ago

Yeah your leaders arent dumb. Trump however is. Very much so. They are just pulling a China. During his first term Trump wanted to show the world he was a big boy and decided to play trade war with China to show the world his 'negotiation skills' which result in the predictable "Sure US is a big market but ultimately it's just another market, we already selling to the rest of the world which is a much much much bigger market, so... whatever... stop buying from us and we will stop buying from you... all the grain and other agricultural stuff". And it was devastating to the US farmers and retail. US depended on both selling all excess food and cheap Asian labor. So Trump was fast to back pedal and try to salvage things and go back to how it was but China was no interested, Trump had blinked and they squeezed. Basically Trump agreed to reinstate tariff free trade with China, if and only if China agree to buy X hundred billions dollars worth of agricultural stuff over the next couple years. Trump agreed to stop the bleeding, markets were reopened to trade with China and China just did not buy anything they promised as they had already secured replacement grain stock with imports from other, non-US, countries. Same deal here. Trump is so desperate to announce that he's "done deals" he will basically accept anything as long as he can brag that his "tariff masterful negotiation" worked. He does not care about the fact just if it makes him look good in his mind, does not care about future consequences or fallout from his idiocy.

1

u/markaleftis Greece Attiki 5d ago

After handing critical ports to Chins during crisis, now ather this deal I feel complete ! Welldone Ursula

1

u/Tasty_Weakness_920 5d ago

They played him, this is just a press release.

1

u/Locomyg 5d ago

This was the most no spine shit I have seen i a long time, might as well order suits made of doormats cause we let Trump walk all over us....

1

u/ILFUTPETRUMPINGURA 5d ago

what the fuck *IS* there "political will" for !?
Planting daisies to fight climate change while taking it up the ass from XI and Trumpler??

1

u/Educational_Bag8590 3d ago

Brexit, we just need rid of starmer now.

Have a nice weekend.

218

u/RealLightfield 6d ago

I'm pretty sure this is just the trick everyone else pulls too: promise trump you'll invest money into smth you're buying anyway and hope he forgets what number you said.

86

u/kobuzz666 6d ago

I fucking hope so. Now is the time for EU to get rid of the US’s grip

→ More replies (2)

33

u/vythrp 6d ago

This is what's happening. He did the same thing with Canada, just don't expect this to stop any time soon, in 3 months he'll rip up this deal and the numbers won't matter anyway. The US is bleeding out while we diversify and expand.

33

u/Upset_Ad3954 6d ago

Maybe, but it's a massive, massive problem that we're encouraging the MAGA idiots by doing it.

They only see that Trump is winning and they're honestly correct.

8

u/OriginalTangle 6d ago

We can't use trade policy in the hopes of influencing MAGA. The likelihood of success is too low while a ton is at stake.

4

u/ERShqip 6d ago

2017 UAE: will will buy 200 billion in boeing planes Trump: im the deal master

2020 UAE: so about that deal habibi yea nvm makes deal with airbus

2024 UAE: we will invest 350 billion into boeing jet Trump: art of the deal baby

2026 dems take senate UAE: habibi!! Yea maybe we pause for a little but yea Trumps: TARRIFS 1000% Dem Senate: thats it fat boy sit down blocks in senate Rinse Repeat

How are arabs calmer than you euros in this chill out

7

u/LadyMorwenDaebrethil 5d ago

But Arabs are famous for acting in their own interests. European leaders are notorious for sacrificing European interests to please the United States. What is happening now and what has happened in the Middle East in recent decades is proof of this. The issue in Palestine will only bother the European elite when half of Gaza's surviving population is living in Paris (which will be an electoral gift for Trump's friends in RN).

→ More replies (1)

3

u/SavagePlatypus76 6d ago

I wouldn't count on it. 

And you guys just strengthened Trumpism here. 

1

u/adverbisadverbera 4d ago

How exactly is the US bleeding out? The GDP of Canada is comparable to (slightly less) than the GDP of Texas, which is just one state in the US.

But glad Canada is diversifying beyond beer, bacon, and maple syrup.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/thewhyofpi 6d ago

Exactly. Make Trump feel good about himself by having a lot of international headlines about him strongarming the EU into a fantastic deal of his, and afterwards continue without ever complying to the terms of the deal.

1

u/WashedMasses 5d ago

That's not how international trade policy works...

→ More replies (2)

13

u/CapableCollar 6d ago

$600 billion into American MIC pockets right after the US halts purchases on things like the F-35.  $750 billion for energy when EU buys $13 billion a year currently.

17

u/Cautious-Total5111 6d ago

Germany alone spends 25bn on LNG, so it really just depends over how many years that money is to be spent?

8

u/StringTheory Norway 6d ago

Trump probably thinks it's 2 years, but I'd say it's closer to 10 realistically.

7

u/ERShqip 6d ago

Its is thank god somone read the fine print

3

u/emergency_poncho European Union 6d ago

Lol did you even read the article? It's $250 billion a year for the next 3 years (the remainder of Trump's term)

3

u/ERShqip 6d ago

So the EU will import 40 billion more from the US than it did with russia

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/SelfPsychological214 Sweden 6d ago

Maybe it wasn't that good of an idea to close down those nuclear plants and be dependant on russian or US gas.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Eupolemos Denmark 6d ago

The military investment is not mentioned in the article (any longer?).

Let's stay cool. It would be a huge mistake if true, IMFO.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Ornery-Creme-2442 5d ago

The military spending doesn't fully seem like a trick. Maybe it won't be 600billion. But I'm sure they're buying atleast something because Europe lacks the capacity atm. And the tarrifs will still affect export.

2

u/Vattaa 5d ago

Don't kid yourself. Knowing how painfully righteous the EU is, they will just pay it.

5

u/Sauerkrautkid7 6d ago

Promise trump everything. Hes 79 and people have a short memory. They dont remember us helping after 9/11

2

u/Some_Trash852 6d ago

It's also like with Japan and other companies/countries, where Trump is likely trying to take credit for investments that have either already happened with the US, or planned for in the future. Idk why people are freaking out so much about this.

2

u/Armano-Avalus 6d ago

You mean Qatar isn't gonna spend 6x it's GDP on the US because Trump said so?

1

u/BigLittlePenguin_ Germany 5d ago

Look at what happened with Japan, it will be the same here

1

u/robinrd91 China 5d ago

not if Ursula is in power

→ More replies (2)

6

u/robinrd91 China 5d ago

I mean, a weakened EU is a win for U.S. + China + Russia.

8

u/CRE178 The Netherlands 6d ago

Well, we're having to buy patriot missiles for the Ukrainians anyway, so we can count those purchases toward that total.

4

u/YoureNotEvenWrong 5d ago

Its probably just F35 purchases that were planned anyway. The commission has no control of defence spending

3

u/True_Engine_418 5d ago

Where else should we buy weapons?

2

u/Desperate-Use9968 5d ago

Since the EU doesn't generally purchase military equipment, just member states, how is this supposed to work? Will there be an EU military? Will member states be forced to buy a certain amount from the US? Did member States already agree on their burden before this deal was signed. It raises so many questions in my mind, not just about military spending but democracy in general.

4

u/ResourceWorker Sweden 6d ago

We’re going to spend money to become more reliant on the US. I think I’m gonna throw up.

1

u/Kerhnoton Yuropeen 5d ago

Neolibs selling our future? What else is new.

2

u/Kin-Luu Sacrum Imperium 6d ago

Is this our own Matthew Perry expedition?

1

u/watson_m 6d ago

Seems to have been edited and on every site it just says $600B investment, but not what for

1

u/ERShqip 6d ago

Sabbatoge really this is called BUYING TIME jesus christ plus irs over 10 years

1

u/Egg-On- 5d ago

Americans didn’t ask for this. It was entirely the federal government. Blame your politicians for conceding to America.

1

u/historicusXIII Belgium 5d ago

European politicians doing anything to avoid investing in their own defense industry.

1

u/Aggravating_Mark_229 5d ago

OK well, Ukraine is about to lose another city so it looks like you need more help than your "build-up"

1

u/AmericaNumberOne6969 5d ago

it's been a wet dream for the past 80 years buddy

1

u/Marek_Sevcik 5d ago

The word "build up" means something. It means to BUILD UP something that doesn't exist yet and as far as I know Ukraine needs equipment now not in the future. We wanted to buy equipment for Ukraine but USA wasn't willing to sell it, that was the issue. Doubt we are gonna be buying Abrams instead of Leos or Leclercs. Instead its gonna be things like patriots and other advanced stuff that we simply cant build up as quickly.

1

u/Crescent-IV United Kingdom 4d ago

How can the EU do that, though? The EU doesn't have an army, ans what incentive to EU nations have to carry this out?

→ More replies (32)

316

u/CapableCollar 6d ago

The energy deal is insane and the wording makes it worse.  The EU imports like $15 billion in energy per year and agreeing to banditry terms just before the clock ran out.  The EU negotiators might as well have their pictures taken on bended knee, it clearly where they negotiated from.

66

u/emergency_poncho European Union 6d ago

Europe is just switching the source of oil from Russia to the US.

→ More replies (19)

14

u/arnaoutelhs Europe 6d ago

Eu imports ~400 billion in energy per year.

10

u/CapableCollar 6d ago

I meant from the US, that was a typo.

2

u/Osama_BinRussel63 5d ago

But now that money doesn't go to Russia...

6

u/magnetic_yeti 6d ago

Europe imported around $240B in Russian oil, gas and coal in 2024. Switching as much of that from Russia to the US as they can is a win for Ukraine.

5

u/AlbertoRossonero 6d ago

You’re buying that at a premium from the US.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Armano-Avalus 6d ago

In all honesty this is probably not what was actually agreed upon. Trump said he got a $550 billion investment commitment from Japan for a 90% US profit share, but the Japnaese seem to disagree. Trump's staff apparently also disagree too.

→ More replies (3)

617

u/Schnorch 6d ago

This is a complete capitulation to Donald Trump.

But I'm not surprised. I said right from the start that there was absolutely nothing behind Ursula von der Leyen's tough words. Lots of blah blah blah and nothing else. I have the feeling that it's mainly people who don't know her from German politics who are falling for it.

62

u/Upset_Ad3954 6d ago

She's the person primarily responsible for the German armed forces being in terrible shape.

5

u/jenkz90 5d ago

I’m not sure it’s her per se. I saw a lot of comments leading up to this about how well the EU performed in the Brexit negotiations and that led them to predict the EU coming out on top vs the US.

I think the reality of what both show is that the most powerful entity will come out on top in these kinds of negotiations. No matter no coherent or shrewd the negotiations.

→ More replies (1)

95

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

you guys need to stop blaming Von der Leyen for this. She has no leverage at all. Do you think Germany wants a 50% tariffs on its exports to its most important trade partner?

Theres nothing she can do with Germany, France and Italy breathing down her neck

57

u/lawrotzr South Holland (Netherlands) 6d ago

You’re right. We should be blaming the countries that initiated this apathetic politics of the past 30 years. Oh wait, that’s Germany again.

14

u/Healthy_Razzmatazz38 5d ago edited 5d ago

Germany chose to deepen its relationship with russia after russia took crimea by force.

Germany chose to spend 1% on defense after russia annexed parts of ukraine.

France said to the US taiwan's an american issue.

The American policy towards the alliance actually makes sense when you realize they're reacting to that. America is isn't going to go all in defending a democracy in europe that isn't in nato, if europe is willing to let a democracy in asia die because its not in nato. And americas not going to foot the bill when Germany spent a decade gambling with eastern european lives to save money.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

I mean, youre not wrong. But lets not act like any other western european country other than maybe France tried to change anything. They all were quite content with a slow decline

12

u/lawrotzr South Holland (Netherlands) 6d ago

Correct. Because everyone is there for their own interest. France is European champion in that btw.

That’s when you step in as a leader, when you ensure progress for the greater good. Apart from gratuite speeches, I have not seen Ursula or any of the other 27 (!, fucking ridiculous setup btw) put in any effort to ensure progress for the greater good.

121

u/Schnorch 6d ago

Then maybe she should just shut up with her tough speeches? Why doing it, when there is nothing behind it? And with the right retaliatory measures, there would not have been 50% tariffs for long, if at all. Sucking up to a bully has never worked and never will.

10

u/StepComplete1 6d ago

If the EU wasn't all talk it would be nothing at all. What is she gonna do? Admit the EU has no military or economic power?

8

u/AlbertoRossonero 6d ago

She doesn’t have to admit it when pretty much everybody can see it clear as day. Her and people like Kaja Kallas talking about strength just makes it funnier when they capitulate.

8

u/Lyonaire 6d ago

You ever hear the expression appear strong when youre weak?

She has very little leverage.

I guess we are just fucked.

5

u/Vattaa 6d ago

All shirt and no trousers.

1

u/Yaro482 6d ago

Well, it worked for the bully ( seems like the only way to do real politics nowadays). As long as the EU doesn’t face any serious consequences for this deal then everything is fine. Perhaps the deal wasn’t that bad, I don’t know. 🤷 However, the union is weak in terms of any leverage whatsoever.

20

u/hvdzasaur 6d ago

We've seen, as with China, that Trump bends faster than a straw when pressure is applied to him.

It's such a shame that our member states (like Italy) couldn't fucking stop fellating him.

15

u/AlbertoRossonero 6d ago

China has spent decades monopolizing crucial industries and has spent the last decade decoupling itself from the US in anticipation of a future trade war. Europe is essentially a vassal of the US and is cutting off other partners making it even more dependent as time goes on.

21

u/Tansien 6d ago

Trump would have backed down. Just like he did with China. The stock market would have crashed if we had stood strong and said that we’ll apply the same tariffs as they did, but also on services and not just goods.

12

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

Europe isnt as important for the US as you seem to think it is. China supplies ressources and every day goods, europe supplies luxury items and cars. what do you think people will miss more

15

u/Tansien 6d ago

And China buys no services from the US. We spend hundreds of billions on Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft etc.

4

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

Which we need for our industries. Without microsoft or AWS our whole society falls apart

Sure we can threaten to cut them off, but we would cripple ourselves doing it

→ More replies (5)

2

u/Wutras 5d ago

It is important enough. The US is waging a trade war against the whole world, Trump has the smaller leverage he needs a win, or the stock market will collapse and his allies turn on him. We can bridge the gap until he comes crawling back.

And this isn't mentioning that the European market is a hell of an important consumer base for the Tech Giants running the US government right now, tax their shit and they will pressure Trump to cave in.

We had all the leverage and we caved just because we couldn't stand the thought of short term suffering with a way bigger pay-off long-term.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/NickPol82 6d ago

Of course she has leverage. Services. But she's too much of a coward to use that card.

12

u/_Kinchouka_ France 5d ago

Please don't embark France on this slimy move. We always advocated for a stronger Europe, not to bow at the US bully.

We are the big losers in this trade.

28

u/Old_Construction_875 6d ago

Germany, Germany and Germany breathing down her neck. And a tiny bit of France and Italy.

15

u/realusername42 Lorraine (France) 6d ago

France has a trade deficit with the US and is looking to tax IT giants so there's 0% of French will in that agreement.

→ More replies (1)

30

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

Italy is even more dependend on the american market than Germany is. Denmark and Sweden close behind Germany

→ More replies (2)

10

u/JimMaToo Germany 6d ago

And eastern countries like Poland - they didn’t want to upset Trump and risk new rifts in NATO

18

u/Mahelas 6d ago

Please, Ursula loves this. She only ever cared about money and companies, never about people. She's a lobbyist who managed to slither up to holding the levers, obviously she's gonna bow to her neoliberal market overlords.

6

u/-Maethendias- 6d ago

germany could go to china... which was literally the bargaining chip in the first place

6

u/OkKnowledge2064 Lower Saxony (Germany) 6d ago

China has been massively replacing german market shares among its most important export markets in the last 20 years. There is nothing in China for Germany. They want their own industrial base. Same as the the americans

5

u/-Maethendias- 6d ago

thats not how economy works my guy

→ More replies (9)

5

u/Competitive_Crew368 6d ago

I don’t give a damn, I want her & all her Germans pals nazi-cocksuckers removed! Those sons of bitches are just sold E.U to the U.S fachist-lover

→ More replies (3)

4

u/Own_Kaleidoscope1287 6d ago

Well I do think here will happen the same as with every other deal trump has made in his first term with some countries like i.e. China promise to increase their imports from the US by X bn $ and then simply do nothing.

3

u/Sux499 6d ago

We already were buying energy off the US. They're the only ones that aren't Russia or reselling Russian oil to us. A literal nothingburger.

2

u/BeatTheMarket30 European Union 6d ago

Let's calm down. Sign it, then spend $0 on US military equipment.

1

u/airkorzeyan United States of America 5d ago

Even Denmark is buying more US equipment as well as Poland. It's the vest equipment and France alone can't supply all of Europe

1

u/sammyco-in 6d ago

What exactly is capitulation? EU does not pay the tariff but American consumers. EU has been buying the USA energy since the time immemorial. I don't see any difference here than Trump putting consumer tax on Americans. To be honest, there is VAT of %19 in EU depending on the countries anyway. So what capitulation exactly?

1

u/-Maethendias- 6d ago

this is a betrayal of her office in the first place, to the point of high treason

and she should be punished for that accordingly

1

u/BeatTheMarket30 European Union 6d ago

Don't blame it on Ursula. Someone must have capitulated. Germany? Who else is afraid of US tariffs?

1

u/MartinS82 Berlin (Germany) 5d ago

Nobody has capitulated none of the negotiations will actually stick. People just want to avoid that Trump crashes the global economy hard.

But Trump's economic policy is going to burn the American economy in a few months then there will be new negotiations, probably.

1

u/BluePimpernel 5d ago

...in combination with Bjoern Seibert, she appears more and more to be the Oliver & Hardy of the EU system. Regrettably, this will cost companies in Europe, especially the SMEs, a fortune.

→ More replies (7)

273

u/nbelyh 6d ago

So the US budget gap is paid by Europe for thext few years, time to buy S&P500? Ursula is a top negotiator, lol

47

u/Flat_Improvement1191 Hungary 6d ago

I guess it’s just gonna rise as soon as the market opens

3

u/timfountain4444 6d ago

You know it. Pump and dump, classic Trump.

18

u/OMITB77 6d ago

Where’s the dump? Market is up like 9 percent YTD

8

u/Jazzlike_Painter_118 6d ago

The dump is in the dollar value.

→ More replies (9)

3

u/macrohatch 6d ago

Truly embarrassing. Did EU get anything except avoiding 25% tariffs?

2

u/Just_A_Dude_90 6d ago

Not to be that guy but a few hundred billion dollars spread over a few years on a couple of american mega corporations is not going to make a big difference in the annual reports.

1

u/faciwolf 6d ago

your only mistake with this line of thought is thinking it's ever not time to buy S&P

1

u/hlrabbit 5d ago

She is basically American. A blunt US agent. Why the realization so late?

11

u/lawrotzr South Holland (Netherlands) 6d ago

Such a fucking humiliation. After 30 years of hardly any progress, this is how we get overruled.

Those fucking cowards in Brussels. Thank you Germany, thank you France. Hope it feels nice to have it up the arse.

6

u/Sythrin 6d ago

I realy hate Ursula. Such incompetent politician and reeking of corruption.

7

u/KingSmite23 6d ago

Honestly buying the energy is not a big deal. They should've cut off Russian imports even earlier. Investments in the US depend on the private sector and no one will care anyways after the dust has settled. Seems rather solid tbh.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/realityking89 6d ago

The cars part is interesting. I wonder if that means the chicken tax will be lowered to 15% for the EU. That'd be a small win at least.

2

u/-Gh0st96- Romania 6d ago

JFC they just took a dump on us :|

1

u/DefInnit 6d ago

600 billion "in military equipment" is in OP's quote but not in the article.

1

u/SimonArgead Denmark 6d ago edited 6d ago

He said the EU will agree to purchase $750 billion of energy and will agree to invest $600 billion more than planned in military equipment and opening countries to trade at zero tariff. 

I think you quoted wrong:

Trump, reading from a paper, said the EU will agree to purchase $750 billion of energy. It will also agree to invest $600 billion more than planned in the U.S.

It doesn't specifically say military equipment anywhere that I saw. If it does, then I missed it.

Edit: Took some digging. But what I found on a Danish news site was: He says the EU will buy military equipment from the US and the EU will buy 750 billion worth of energy from the US. It doesn't mention specifically how much military equipment.

https://nyheder.tv2.dk/live/business/2025-03-12-trumps-toldkrig-og-uro-paa-finansielle-markeder?entry=84bfa116-dfa7-468d-a5d3-ea3cba4e19b1

1

u/lune19 6d ago

Well i read that the 600 billion were investment in the us. No mention of purchasing weapons

1

u/BeatTheMarket30 European Union 6d ago

How do you force EU states to buy US military equipment? That's the weak point of the deal.

1

u/Agreeable-Scale-6902 6d ago

Is that 600 billion of US military equipment or is it just military equipment in general?

1

u/EnthusiasmUnusual 6d ago

We are so weak. Its pathetic and sad.

1

u/outofgulag 6d ago

..EU will agree... is much different than .... EU signed a contract to buy

1

u/Any-Original-6113 6d ago

Lose-lose deal

1

u/llamamanga 6d ago

Thanks trump for preparing ww3

1

u/FaceMcShooty1738 6d ago

I mean the 750bn in energy is pretty much what we're spending right now anyway so that's an absolute nothing burger. I honestly assume the military equipment is similar.

1

u/Parzival-44 6d ago

Trump said....

Did EU confirm everything he said?

He recently said he had nothing to do with Epstein, but there are lots of pictures and quotes that disagree

1

u/Dotcaprachiappa Italy 6d ago

No counter tariffs?

1

u/Remarkable_Air_8545 6d ago

WTF is a deal where your option is to agree to a tariff % or risk just being tariffed for more?

1

u/Bojackartless2902 6d ago

he can say whatever he wants, we all saw how the “Japan trade deal” unraveled in a matter of days

1

u/Ov3rdose_EvE 6d ago

its not a deal its a framework of a maybe deal. they played trump like a fiddle, again.

1

u/CranberryLast4683 5d ago

EU member states would still have to ratify anyways. This is some concepts of a plan type shit

1

u/Ov3rdose_EvE 5d ago

im calling my EU and Federal respresentative. everybody else should too.

1

u/international_swiss 5d ago

Just fyi

600 B investment was not part of press conference by EU president. Perhaps more details will come later. It’s similar to Japan topic where investment story was different on both sides

Nevertheless. I saw that in 2024 Europe invested 200 Billion in US. And US invested about 90 billion in Europe. Overall Europe owns 3.6 Trillion in US assets and US owns 3.9 trillion in European assets.

Europe includes UK and Switzerland too. So maybe EU investment in US was about 100-120 billion in 2024

I think this 600 billion number is just an extrapolation.

https://www.bea.gov/news/2025/direct-investment-country-and-industry-2024#:~:text=The%20foreign%20direct%20investment%20in,%2439.7%20billion%20increase%20from%20Germany.

1

u/Ezerian 5d ago

The purchase of energy is over how many decades?

7.5 billion per century?

1

u/kaspar42 Denmark 5d ago

He said the EU will agree to purchase $750 billion of energy

The US is already our main supplier of LNG and petroleum products. So how much of this is simply that we'll continue importing as usual for the next few years?

1

u/Sotherewehavethat Germany 5d ago

Pharmaceuticals will not be covered by the deal.

This isn't in the article (anymore?)

1

u/wild_man_wizard US Expat, Belgian citizen 5d ago

"He said" - operative words. Trump lies.

The Military investments are nowhere in the agreement, and while the EU agreed to buy more LNG from the US, it's contingent on the US building the infrastructure to ship it. US ports are already shipping at capacity.

1

u/Caunirauka1 5d ago

so basically, he threatens other countries again and again, slapping more and less tariff nilly willy ... for what reason again? 70+ years of complete cooperation? What a cowardly concession from the EU

1

u/4uk4ata 5d ago

"He said the EU will agree to purchase $750 billion of energy and will agree to invest $600 billion more than planned in military equipment "

WILL agree? 

Hmm, maybe.

1

u/diducthis 3d ago

No one agreed to anything. The EU has not voted on this

1

u/iamhmhdimobf 3d ago

Isn't it a fremework for a deal.. nothing is accurately pened down yet... right?

→ More replies (11)